Softwr

Software · head to head

Pipedrive vs Qwilr

Pipedrive logo

Pipedrive

Software

The CRM that sales teams love to use

From
On request
Rated
-
Qwilr logo

Qwilr

Software

Beautiful Proposals and Quotes

From
$35/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Pipedrive email account connectivity restricted to maximum of five email accounts per user; Qwilr growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
  • They diverge on capability: Pipedrive covers Visual pipeline, Qwilr covers Web-based proposals.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Pipedrive and Qwilr actually diverge.

Attributes where Pipedrive and Qwilr differ
AttributePipedriveQwilr
Starting priceOn request$35/month
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb
Founded20102014

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Pipedrive

  • Visual pipeline
  • Deal tracking
  • Activity reminders
  • Email integration
  • Mobile apps
  • Reporting
  • Goal tracking
  • Lead management

Only in Qwilr

  • Web-based proposals
  • Interactive quotes
  • E-signatures
  • Analytics
  • Video embedding
  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • Stripe

Both cover

  • Slack

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Pipedrive

  • Sales pipeline management with kanban-style dashboardsnot Qwilr
  • Multi-channel communication with email and calendar syncnot Qwilr
  • Sales automation for small to mid-market teamsnot Qwilr

Qwilr

  • Sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billingnot Pipedrive

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Pipedrive

  • Email account connectivity restricted to maximum of five email accounts per user

Qwilr

  • Growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
  • Document automation beyond the free monthly allotment (10, 150 or 600 documents by tier) costs $5, $2.50 or $2.50 per additional document
  • QwilrPay charges a payment processing fee on top of the subscription, ranging from 0.25% on Starter down to 0.05% on Scale

Pricing, plan by plan

Pipedrive

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Pipedrive review.

Qwilr

$35/month
  • Business$35/month
    • Unlimited documents
    • Templates
    • E-signatures
  • Enterprise$59/month
    • Custom branding
    • Advanced analytics
    • Integrations

Which should you pick?

Choose Pipedrive if

  • You need visual pipeline.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want deal tracking.

Choose Qwilr if

  • You need web-based proposals.
  • You also want interactive quotes.

Questions people ask

Is Pipedrive or Qwilr better?
Neither clearly leads. Pipedrive starts at On request and Qwilr at $35/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Pipedrive or Qwilr?
Pipedrive starts at On request and Qwilr at $35/month.
Does Pipedrive or Qwilr run on more platforms?
Pipedrive runs on Web, iOS, Android. Qwilr runs on Web.
What is Pipedrive best used for?
Pipedrive is most often used for sales pipeline management with kanban-style dashboards, multi-channel communication with email and calendar sync, sales automation for small to mid-market teams. Of those, sales pipeline management with kanban-style dashboards and multi-channel communication with email and calendar sync are not what Qwilr is typically brought in for.
What can Pipedrive do that Qwilr cannot?
Pipedrive covers Visual pipeline, Deal tracking, Activity reminders, Email integration. Qwilr covers Web-based proposals, Interactive quotes, E-signatures, Analytics. Both handle Slack.

Related pages

Other head to heads