Construction · head to head
ALICE Technologies vs Newforma

ALICE Technologies
Construction
Generative construction scheduling that produces and compares millions of build sequences
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Newforma
Construction
Project information management system for construction
- From
- $300/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ALICE Technologies the output is only as good as the recipes, and building accurate recipes is specialist modelling work most contractors cannot staff, so engagements depend on ALICE or a consultant doing it, which turns software into a services contract.; Newforma pricing is by quote only, with no rate, tier or minimum published; the site offers only Book a Demo and Get Started
- They diverge on capability: ALICE Technologies covers Generative scheduling, Newforma covers Document management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ALICE Technologies and Newforma actually diverge.
| Attribute | ALICE Technologies | Newforma |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $300/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, Windows | Web, Ios, Android |
| Founded | Unknown | 2006 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ALICE Technologies
- Generative scheduling
- Recipe modelling
- Optioneering
- Schedule recovery
- Resource levelling
- 4D visualisation
- P6 and MS Project import
- Scenario comparison reports
Only in Newforma
- Document management
- Project collaboration
- Transmittals
- RFI tracking
- Issue management
- Autodesk BIM 360
- Box
- Dropbox
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ALICE Technologies
- A data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers itnot Newforma
- A contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committingnot Newforma
- A bid team wanting to submit a shorter programme than competitors while proving to the client that the resource profile is achievable rather than optimisticnot Newforma
- A delay claim where the contractor must demonstrate to a client or adjudicator what the schedule would have looked like without a specific disruptionnot Newforma
Newforma
- Managing project email, documents and submittals for architecture and engineering firmsnot ALICE Technologies
- Keeping construction project information on-premises for control and security through Project Centernot ALICE Technologies
- Coordinating issues and RFIs across design and construction teams in Konektnot ALICE Technologies
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ALICE Technologies
- The output is only as good as the recipes, and building accurate recipes is specialist modelling work most contractors cannot staff, so engagements depend on ALICE or a consultant doing it, which turns software into a services contract.
- Pricing is quoted per project or programme with no published rates, so the tool is effectively unavailable to anyone who cannot justify a bespoke enterprise negotiation.
- It only pays back on projects where float has a high monetary value; on a mid-size commercial building the modelling effort exceeds the schedule saving, which is why the customer list skews to data centres, energy and heavy civils.
- A generated schedule still has to be accepted by superintendents and subcontractors who did not build it, and adoption failures are usually social rather than technical: the field runs the plan it believes in.
- The 2026 McKinsey alliance pushes distribution towards consulting-led engagements, which raises the effective cost of entry and makes the direct-purchase path less certain for a contractor that just wants a licence.
Newforma
- Pricing is by quote only, with no rate, tier or minimum published; the site offers only Book a Demo and Get Started
- The cloud product Konekt and the on-premises product Project Center are separate offerings, so the on-premises option requires a different product rather than a deployment setting
Pricing, plan by plan
ALICE Technologies
On request- ALICE$undefined/year
- Quoted per project or per programme
- Generative scheduling and optioneering
- Recipe modelling support
Newforma
$300/month- Standard$300/month
- Document management
- Project collaboration
- Transmittals
- EnterpriseFree
- Advanced workflows
- Custom reporting
- API access
Which should you pick?
Choose ALICE Technologies if
- You need generative scheduling.
- You work on Web, Windows.
- You also want recipe modelling.
Choose Newforma if
- You need document management.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want project collaboration.
Questions people ask
- Is ALICE Technologies or Newforma better?
- Neither clearly leads. ALICE Technologies starts at On request and Newforma at $300/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ALICE Technologies or Newforma?
- ALICE Technologies starts at On request and Newforma at $300/month.
- Does ALICE Technologies or Newforma run on more platforms?
- ALICE Technologies runs on Web, Windows. Newforma runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- What is ALICE Technologies best used for?
- ALICE Technologies is most often used for a data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers it, a contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committing, a bid team wanting to submit a shorter programme than competitors while proving to the client that the resource profile is achievable rather than optimistic, a delay claim where the contractor must demonstrate to a client or adjudicator what the schedule would have looked like without a specific disruption. Of those, a data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers it and a contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committing are not what Newforma is typically brought in for.
- What can ALICE Technologies do that Newforma cannot?
- ALICE Technologies covers Generative scheduling, Recipe modelling, Optioneering, Schedule recovery. Newforma covers Document management, Project collaboration, Transmittals, RFI tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ALICE Technologies: What does ALICE actually produce?
A set of alternative construction sequences generated from your constraints, scored on duration, cost and resource use, so you can choose rather than accept one plan.
Newforma: What is Newforma pricing?
Newforma does not publish pricing on its website. The company offers three product offerings: Newforma Konekt, Newforma Project Center, and Newforma ConstructEx. Customers must book a demo or contact the company directly for custom pricing.
SourceALICE Technologies: Does it replace Primavera P6?
No. It imports from and exports to P6. P6 remains the contractual schedule of record on most projects.
ALICE Technologies: Is the company still operating?
Yes. ALICE is active as of 2026 and announced an alliance with McKinsey in April 2026 to deliver AI scheduling to McKinsey clients.
ALICE Technologies: How much does it cost?
Not published. It is quoted per project or programme and typically includes modelling and onboarding services.
ALICE Technologies: What size project justifies it?
Projects where a week of schedule has a large monetary value: data centres, energy, industrial and major infrastructure. It is hard to justify on standard commercial building work.
Related pages
More on ALICE Technologies
Other head to heads
- ALICE Technologies vs Procore
- ALICE Technologies vs Primavera P6
- ALICE Technologies vs Smartsheet Construction
- ALICE Technologies vs Reconstruct
- ALICE Technologies vs Trimble Pay
- ALICE Technologies vs Assignar
- ALICE Technologies vs Buildots
- ALICE Technologies vs Contractor Foreman
- ALICE Technologies vs eSUB
- ALICE Technologies vs GCPay
- ALICE Technologies vs HammerTech
- ALICE Technologies vs Handoff
- ALICE Technologies vs HCSS HeavyBid
- ALICE Technologies vs Houzz Pro
- ALICE Technologies vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- ALICE Technologies vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- ALICE Technologies vs B2W Estimate
- ALICE Technologies vs Trimble
- ALICE Technologies vs SketchUp
- ALICE Technologies vs ArchiCAD
- ALICE Technologies vs Oracle Aconex
- ALICE Technologies vs Kahua
- ALICE Technologies vs Microsoft Project
- ALICE Technologies vs Egnyte
- ALICE Technologies vs e-Builder
- ALICE Technologies vs Trunk Tools
- ALICE Technologies vs Document Crunch
- Newforma vs Procore
- Newforma vs Primavera P6
- Newforma vs Smartsheet Construction
- Newforma vs Reconstruct
- Newforma vs Trimble Pay
- Newforma vs Assignar
- Newforma vs Buildots
- Newforma vs Contractor Foreman
- Newforma vs eSUB
- Newforma vs GCPay
- Newforma vs HammerTech
- Newforma vs Handoff
- Newforma vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Newforma vs Houzz Pro
- Newforma vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Newforma vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Newforma vs B2W Estimate
- Newforma vs Trimble
- Newforma vs SketchUp
- Newforma vs ArchiCAD
- Newforma vs Oracle Aconex
- Newforma vs Kahua
- Newforma vs Microsoft Project
- Newforma vs Egnyte
- Newforma vs e-Builder
- Newforma vs Trunk Tools
- Newforma vs Document Crunch
