Construction · head to head
ALICE Technologies vs Microsoft Project

ALICE Technologies
Construction
Generative construction scheduling that produces and compares millions of build sequences
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Microsoft Project
Construction
Keep projects organized and on track
- From
- $10/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ALICE Technologies the output is only as good as the recipes, and building accurate recipes is specialist modelling work most contractors cannot staff, so engagements depend on ALICE or a consultant doing it, which turns software into a services contract.; Microsoft Project performance degrades with large projects over 400 tasks, becoming slow and unstable
- They diverge on capability: ALICE Technologies covers Generative scheduling, Microsoft Project covers Gantt charts.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ALICE Technologies and Microsoft Project actually diverge.
| Attribute | ALICE Technologies | Microsoft Project |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $10/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web, Windows | Web, Windows, macOS |
| Founded | Unknown | 1975 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ALICE Technologies
- Generative scheduling
- Recipe modelling
- Optioneering
- Schedule recovery
- Resource levelling
- 4D visualisation
- P6 and MS Project import
- Scenario comparison reports
Only in Microsoft Project
- Gantt charts
- Resource management
- Budget tracking
- Timeline views
- Task dependencies
- Critical path
- Earned value analysis
- Portfolio management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ALICE Technologies
- A data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers itnot Microsoft Project
- A contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committingnot Microsoft Project
- A bid team wanting to submit a shorter programme than competitors while proving to the client that the resource profile is achievable rather than optimisticnot Microsoft Project
- A delay claim where the contractor must demonstrate to a client or adjudicator what the schedule would have looked like without a specific disruptionnot Microsoft Project
Microsoft Project
- Project schedulingnot ALICE Technologies
- Resource allocationnot ALICE Technologies
- Portfolio managementnot ALICE Technologies
- Budget trackingnot ALICE Technologies
- Enterprise project managementnot ALICE Technologies
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ALICE Technologies
- The output is only as good as the recipes, and building accurate recipes is specialist modelling work most contractors cannot staff, so engagements depend on ALICE or a consultant doing it, which turns software into a services contract.
- Pricing is quoted per project or programme with no published rates, so the tool is effectively unavailable to anyone who cannot justify a bespoke enterprise negotiation.
- It only pays back on projects where float has a high monetary value; on a mid-size commercial building the modelling effort exceeds the schedule saving, which is why the customer list skews to data centres, energy and heavy civils.
- A generated schedule still has to be accepted by superintendents and subcontractors who did not build it, and adoption failures are usually social rather than technical: the field runs the plan it believes in.
- The 2026 McKinsey alliance pushes distribution towards consulting-led engagements, which raises the effective cost of entry and makes the direct-purchase path less certain for a contractor that just wants a licence.
Microsoft Project
- Performance degrades with large projects over 400 tasks, becoming slow and unstable
- Limited Agile methodology support, primarily designed for waterfall project management
- Proprietary .mpp file format creates compatibility issues on non-Windows systems
- No offline mode, limiting users without reliable internet connectivity
Pricing, plan by plan
ALICE Technologies
On request- ALICE$undefined/year
- Quoted per project or per programme
- Generative scheduling and optioneering
- Recipe modelling support
Microsoft Project
$10/month- Plan 1$10/month
- Task and project management
- Grid views
- Timeline features
- Plan 3$30/month
- Desktop client
- Resource management
- Advanced scheduling
- Plan 5$55/month
- Portfolio management
- Demand management
- Enterprise capabilities
Which should you pick?
Choose ALICE Technologies if
- You need generative scheduling.
- You work on Web, Windows.
- You also want recipe modelling.
Choose Microsoft Project if
- You need gantt charts.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS.
- You also want resource management.
Questions people ask
- Is ALICE Technologies or Microsoft Project better?
- Neither clearly leads. ALICE Technologies starts at On request and Microsoft Project at $10/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ALICE Technologies or Microsoft Project?
- ALICE Technologies starts at On request and Microsoft Project at $10/month.
- Does ALICE Technologies or Microsoft Project run on more platforms?
- ALICE Technologies runs on Web, Windows. Microsoft Project runs on Web, Windows, macOS.
- What is ALICE Technologies best used for?
- ALICE Technologies is most often used for a data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers it, a contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committing, a bid team wanting to submit a shorter programme than competitors while proving to the client that the resource profile is achievable rather than optimistic, a delay claim where the contractor must demonstrate to a client or adjudicator what the schedule would have looked like without a specific disruption. Of those, a data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers it and a contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committing are not what Microsoft Project is typically brought in for.
- What can ALICE Technologies do that Microsoft Project cannot?
- ALICE Technologies covers Generative scheduling, Recipe modelling, Optioneering, Schedule recovery. Microsoft Project covers Gantt charts, Resource management, Budget tracking, Timeline views.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ALICE Technologies: What does ALICE actually produce?
A set of alternative construction sequences generated from your constraints, scored on duration, cost and resource use, so you can choose rather than accept one plan.
Microsoft Project: What are the different Microsoft Project plans and pricing?
Microsoft Project offers Plan 1 at $10/user/month for basic project management, Plan 3 at $30/user/month with desktop client and resource management, and Plan 5 at $55/user/month for enterprise portfolio management. Desktop licenses (2024) start at $679.99 for Standard and $1,129.99 for Professional.
SourceALICE Technologies: Does it replace Primavera P6?
No. It imports from and exports to P6. P6 remains the contractual schedule of record on most projects.
Microsoft Project: Does Microsoft Project support Agile methodology?
Microsoft Project was primarily designed for traditional waterfall project management. While it has some Agile features, it is not optimized for Agile workflows compared to dedicated Agile tools like Jira or Monday.com.
SourceALICE Technologies: Is the company still operating?
Yes. ALICE is active as of 2026 and announced an alliance with McKinsey in April 2026 to deliver AI scheduling to McKinsey clients.
Microsoft Project: Can multiple teams collaborate in real-time on Microsoft Project?
Yes, Microsoft Project for the Web provides real-time collaboration through cloud-based access. However, collaboration is noted as harder compared to modern cloud-native tools due to its file-based architecture.
SourceALICE Technologies: How much does it cost?
Not published. It is quoted per project or programme and typically includes modelling and onboarding services.
ALICE Technologies: What size project justifies it?
Projects where a week of schedule has a large monetary value: data centres, energy, industrial and major infrastructure. It is hard to justify on standard commercial building work.
Related pages
More on ALICE Technologies
More on Microsoft Project
Other head to heads
- ALICE Technologies vs Procore
- ALICE Technologies vs Primavera P6
- ALICE Technologies vs Smartsheet Construction
- ALICE Technologies vs Reconstruct
- ALICE Technologies vs Trimble Pay
- ALICE Technologies vs Assignar
- ALICE Technologies vs Buildots
- ALICE Technologies vs Contractor Foreman
- ALICE Technologies vs eSUB
- ALICE Technologies vs GCPay
- ALICE Technologies vs HammerTech
- ALICE Technologies vs Handoff
- ALICE Technologies vs HCSS HeavyBid
- ALICE Technologies vs Houzz Pro
- ALICE Technologies vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- ALICE Technologies vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- ALICE Technologies vs B2W Estimate
- ALICE Technologies vs Trimble
- ALICE Technologies vs Smartsheet
- ALICE Technologies vs Kahua
- ALICE Technologies vs CoConstruct
- ALICE Technologies vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- ALICE Technologies vs Builderbox
- ALICE Technologies vs Fieldwire
- ALICE Technologies vs Dalux
- ALICE Technologies vs e-Builder
- ALICE Technologies vs InEight
- ALICE Technologies vs Knowify
- ALICE Technologies vs Levelset
- ALICE Technologies vs Openspace
- ALICE Technologies vs Newforma
- Microsoft Project vs Procore
- Microsoft Project vs Primavera P6
- Microsoft Project vs Smartsheet Construction
- Microsoft Project vs Reconstruct
- Microsoft Project vs Trimble Pay
- Microsoft Project vs Assignar
- Microsoft Project vs Buildots
- Microsoft Project vs Contractor Foreman
- Microsoft Project vs eSUB
- Microsoft Project vs GCPay
- Microsoft Project vs HammerTech
- Microsoft Project vs Handoff
- Microsoft Project vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Microsoft Project vs Houzz Pro
- Microsoft Project vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Microsoft Project vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Microsoft Project vs B2W Estimate
- Microsoft Project vs Trimble
- Microsoft Project vs Smartsheet
- Microsoft Project vs Kahua
- Microsoft Project vs CoConstruct
- Microsoft Project vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Microsoft Project vs Builderbox
- Microsoft Project vs Fieldwire
- Microsoft Project vs Dalux
- Microsoft Project vs e-Builder
- Microsoft Project vs InEight
- Microsoft Project vs Knowify
- Microsoft Project vs Levelset
- Microsoft Project vs Openspace
- Microsoft Project vs Newforma
