Softwr

Construction · alternatives

Alternatives to ALICE Technologies

22 construction tools sit alongside ALICE Technologies in this directory. Below is what separates each from ALICE Technologies on the figures we hold, price, model, tier count and rating, and a direct comparison for every one.

Alternatives listed
22
With a free tier
1
Cheaper to start
-
ALICE Technologies starts at
On request

Why people look past ALICE Technologies

Only what the record supports. Each point below is a figure on the ALICE Technologies entry measured against the tools listed beside it.

There is no free tier

The record for ALICE Technologies carries no free tier, so evaluating it means paying first. 1 of the 22 alternatives below can be used without paying.

There is only one tier

ALICE Technologies publishes a single plan, ALICE at On request. There is no smaller tier to drop to if the fit is wrong or the budget moves.

What each alternative does differently

Ordered by the aggregated rating on each catalogue entry. Differences are drawn from price, pricing model, tier count and rating, the fields the category listing carries. For a feature-level difference, follow the head-to-head link on each card: those pages read both full records.

$2500/year

Enterprise project portfolio management for construction

  • Publishes an entry price of $2500/year, where ALICE Technologies does not.
  • Sold on a subscription model rather than quote.
  • 2 tiers to ALICE Technologies's 1.
On request

All-in-one construction management platform

Priced and rated the same as ALICE Technologies on the figures we hold. The difference, if there is one, is in the feature records.

Free, then $9/month

Work management platform for construction teams

  • Can be used without paying; ALICE Technologies cannot.
  • Publishes an entry price of $9/month, where ALICE Technologies does not.
  • 2 tiers to ALICE Technologies's 1.
On request

AI-assisted project accounting, job costing and payments for construction contractors

Priced and rated the same as ALICE Technologies on the figures we hold. The difference, if there is one, is in the feature records.

On request

Drone-based progress tracking, quality control and commissioning built specifically for solar farms

  • 2 tiers to ALICE Technologies's 1.
On request

Financial automation and forecasting for contractors sitting on top of construction ERP

Priced and rated the same as ALICE Technologies on the figures we hold. The difference, if there is one, is in the feature records.

Every ALICE Technologies alternative at a glance

A dash means the catalogue entry carries no figure, not that the answer is nothing.

Construction alternatives to ALICE Technologies
ToolEntry priceModelTiersHead to head
ALICE Technologies (this page)On requestQuote1
Primavera P6The contractual scheduling standard; ALICE supplements it rather than replacing it$2500/yearSubscription2vs ALICE Technologies
ProcoreIf the real problem is field coordination and daily progress rather than sequence optimisationOn requestQuote-vs ALICE Technologies
Smartsheet ConstructionA far cheaper way to run schedules collaboratively when optioneering is not the requirementFree, then $9/month-2vs ALICE Technologies
AdaptiveOn requestQuote1vs ALICE Technologies
SitemarkOn requestQuote2vs ALICE Technologies
BriqOn requestQuote1vs ALICE Technologies
Oracle Textura Payment ManagementOn requestPercentage of subcontract value, plus a quoted contractor subscription2vs ALICE Technologies
BilldOn requestQuote2vs ALICE Technologies
Handoff$119/monthPer company per month4vs ALICE Technologies
Skydio Dock for X10On requestQuote1vs ALICE Technologies
Propeller AeroOn requestHardware purchase plus a quoted platform subscription2vs ALICE Technologies
ReconstructOn requestQuote1vs ALICE Technologies
BuildotsOn requestQuote1vs ALICE Technologies
On-Screen TakeoffOn requestQuote1vs ALICE Technologies
Cubit Estimating167/monthPer user per month4vs ALICE Technologies
B2W EstimateOn requestQuote1vs ALICE Technologies
GCPayOn requestQuote2vs ALICE Technologies
Topcon MAGNETOn requestQuote3vs ALICE Technologies
Togal.AI$299/monthPer user per month2vs ALICE Technologies
RIB CostXOn requestQuote3vs ALICE Technologies
HCSS HeavyBidOn requestQuote1vs ALICE Technologies
Oracle Primavera UnifierOn requestQuote2vs ALICE Technologies

Ratings are aggregated from third-party sources and imported with each catalogue entry; Softwr hosts no reviews of these products. How each figure is used is set out on the ALICE Technologies badges page.

Cheaper ways to solve the same problem

Free to start (1)

These publish a tier that costs nothing, so they can be evaluated before any money changes hands.

What you would be giving up

ALICE Technologies is most often brought in for a data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers it, a contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committing, a bid team wanting to submit a shorter programme than competitors while proving to the client that the resource profile is achievable rather than optimistic, a delay claim where the contractor must demonstrate to a client or adjudicator what the schedule would have looked like without a specific disruption. Anything replacing it has to cover the ones you actually depend on, and a cheaper tool that misses one of them is not cheaper.

Two things this page cannot settle. It compares on price, model, tier count and rating, because those are the fields the category listing carries, feature-level differences need both full records, which is what the head-to-head pages load. And the ratings are third-party aggregates imported with each entry rather than reviews written here, so a 0.2 difference between two tools is noise rather than a finding.

If ALICE Technologies is broadly right and the question is cost, the ALICE Technologies pricing breakdown covers every tier and what each one adds. If you want the whole field rather than a shortlist, the Construction category lists everything the directory holds, and best construction tools ranks them.

ALICE Technologies runs on web, windows. Platform coverage is not carried on the category listing for the alternatives, so it is one more thing to check on each head-to-head page rather than here.

Questions about ALICE Technologies alternatives

What are the main alternatives to ALICE Technologies?
22 other construction tools are listed in this directory, led by Primavera P6, Procore, Smartsheet Construction, Adaptive. They are ordered by the aggregated rating on each catalogue entry, not by any Softwr ranking.
What is the best free alternative to ALICE Technologies?
1 of the alternatives listed here can be used without paying: Smartsheet Construction.
Why do people look for an alternative to ALICE Technologies?
On the figures on record, 2 things stand out: there is no free tier; there is only one tier. Each is set out with the numbers behind it above.
What would I give up by switching from ALICE Technologies?
ALICE Technologies is most often brought in for a data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers it, a contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committing, a bid team wanting to submit a shorter programme than competitors while proving to the client that the resource profile is achievable rather than optimistic, a delay claim where the contractor must demonstrate to a client or adjudicator what the schedule would have looked like without a specific disruption. Anything you replace it with has to cover the ones you actually rely on, the side-by-side comparisons linked from each alternative below put the two feature records against each other.
Is there an open-source alternative to ALICE Technologies?
None of the construction tools listed here are recorded as open source. That is what the licence field on each entry says, and the field is not always filled in, so it is worth checking directly for any tool you are serious about.
How were these ALICE Technologies alternatives chosen?
They are the tools filed in the same category, Construction, ordered by the aggregated rating on each entry. There is no editorial shortlist, and nothing on this page is paid: no sponsored placement runs on alternatives pages and the order cannot be bought. Softwr has not used these products.
Where can I compare ALICE Technologies against one of these directly?
Every alternative below has a side-by-side page against ALICE Technologies covering price, platforms, features and what each one is used for. Those pages read the full record for both products rather than the summary shown here.
Does this list cover every construction tool?
No. It covers what this directory holds in the Construction category, 22 tools beside ALICE Technologies. The category page lists the rest of the catalogue as it grows.

Related pages