Maps · head to head
Agisoft Metashape vs HERE Technologies

Agisoft Metashape
Maps
Desktop photogrammetry that turns photographs into point clouds, meshes, orthomosaics and DEMs
- From
- $179/one-time
- Rated
- -

HERE Technologies
Maps
Location data and technology company that provides mapping and location services to businesses globally
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only HERE Technologies has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Agisoft Metashape processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.; HERE Technologies pricing is complex and unpredictable, with additional fees for common functionalities creating surprise costs at scale
- They diverge on capability: Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, HERE Technologies covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Agisoft Metashape and HERE Technologies actually diverge.
| Attribute | Agisoft Metashape | HERE Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $179/one-time | Free |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Web, iOS, Android, Cross-platform |
| Founded | Unknown | 1985 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Agisoft Metashape
- Structure-from-motion alignment
- Dense point cloud generation
- Mesh and texture
- Orthomosaic and DEM
- Ground control points
- Point cloud classification
- Multispectral processing
- Python and Java scripting
Only in HERE Technologies
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Agisoft Metashape
- A survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud creditsnot HERE Technologies
- A quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitivenot HERE Technologies
- An archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscriptionnot HERE Technologies
- A VFX or games studio scanning props and environments, where Standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevantnot HERE Technologies
HERE Technologies
- Map data for automated and assisted drivingnot Agisoft Metashape
- Connected driving, including hazard alerts and road surface analysisnot Agisoft Metashape
- Supply chain planning and logistics digital twinsnot Agisoft Metashape
- Geocoding, search and map rendering through hosted location servicesnot Agisoft Metashape
- Fleet tour planning and routing across 200 countriesnot Agisoft Metashape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Agisoft Metashape
- Processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.
- The vendor is a Russian company, and since 2022 payment is restricted to wire transfer, ACH and SEPA direct debit with no card payment, which some corporate and government procurement departments simply cannot process.
- There is no collaboration layer: no shared projects, no web viewer, no permissions. Sharing results means sending files, which is a real limitation on multi-office teams.
- Support is thin compared with commercial drone platforms, and the software assumes photogrammetric competence; users who do not understand overlap, ground control and residuals produce confidently wrong models.
- A node-locked licence is tied to a machine, and moving it or covering a second workstation means either a reseller-quoted floating licence or buying twice, which erodes the cost advantage for teams rather than individuals.
HERE Technologies
- Pricing is complex and unpredictable, with additional fees for common functionalities creating surprise costs at scale
- Lack of transparency in cost projections makes budgeting and forecasting difficult
- Requires separate API keys and subscriptions for different feature categories, complicating integration
- Customer support quality and responsiveness is inconsistent compared to competitors like Google Maps
Pricing, plan by plan
Agisoft Metashape
$179/one-time- Standard$179/one-time
- Photogrammetric alignment, dense cloud, mesh and texture
- No georeferencing or coordinate systems
- No ground control points
- Professional$3499/one-time
- Everything in Standard
- Georeferencing, coordinate systems and ground control points
- Orthomosaic, DEM and point cloud classification
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared across machines rather than node-locked
- Sold through authorised resellers only
- Quoted rather than listed
HERE Technologies
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the HERE Technologies review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Agisoft Metashape if
- You need structure-from-motion alignment.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want dense point cloud generation.
Choose HERE Technologies if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cross-platform.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Agisoft Metashape or HERE Technologies better?
- Neither clearly leads. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and HERE Technologies at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Agisoft Metashape or HERE Technologies?
- HERE Technologies has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $179/one-time for Agisoft Metashape and Free for HERE Technologies.
- Does Agisoft Metashape or HERE Technologies run on more platforms?
- Agisoft Metashape runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. HERE Technologies runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cross-platform.
- Can I use HERE Technologies for free?
- Yes. HERE Technologies has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time.
- What is Agisoft Metashape best used for?
- Agisoft Metashape is most often used for a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits, a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive, an archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscription, a vfx or games studio scanning props and environments, where standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevant. Of those, a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits and a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive are not what HERE Technologies is typically brought in for.
- What can Agisoft Metashape do that HERE Technologies cannot?
- Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Dense point cloud generation, Mesh and texture, Orthomosaic and DEM. HERE Technologies covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Agisoft Metashape: How much does Metashape cost?
Professional is $3,499 and Standard is $179, both node-locked. Floating licences are quoted through resellers.
HERE Technologies: What does HERE Technologies provide?
HERE Technologies provides a comprehensive location platform including digital maps, routing and navigation APIs, geocoding, search, traffic, positioning, and telematics services for automotive, logistics, and enterprise applications.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Is it a subscription?
No. These are perpetual node-locked licences. Major version upgrades are charged separately.
HERE Technologies: Does HERE offer a free tier?
Yes. HERE provides a free tier with 30,000 map requests per month, 5,000 routing transactions, and 30,000 geocoding transactions. Usage beyond these limits is charged on a pay-as-you-go basis.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: What is the difference between Standard and Professional?
Standard has no georeferencing, coordinate systems, ground control points, orthomosaic export or scripting. Anything survey or mapping related requires Professional.
HERE Technologies: What SDKs and APIs does HERE offer?
HERE provides REST APIs for maps, routing, geocoding, and search, plus SDKs for Android, iOS, Flutter, and JavaScript. The HERE SDK enables turn-by-turn navigation and location services for mobile and web applications.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Does it process in the cloud?
No. All processing is local on your own hardware, which is the main reason it is cheap at volume and slow on weak machines.
HERE Technologies: Is HERE's pricing transparent?
No. HERE uses a complex transaction-based pricing model with separate costs for different API categories. The pricing structure lacks transparency, making it difficult for customers to forecast costs at scale.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Are there educational licences?
Yes, Agisoft offers reduced academic pricing on a separate page.
HERE Technologies: How has HERE's pricing changed?
HERE moved to a simplified transaction-based pricing model with free monthly allowances for common APIs. Users pay per transaction beyond the free tier, though the structure has been criticized for complexity and lack of cost transparency.
SourceRelated pages
More on Agisoft Metashape
More on HERE Technologies
Other head to heads
- Agisoft Metashape vs QGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Correlator3D
- Agisoft Metashape vs Global Mapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Cesium ion
- Agisoft Metashape vs Potree
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leica Infinity
- Agisoft Metashape vs Emlid Studio
- Agisoft Metashape vs onX Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs SW Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Fused
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lonboard
- Agisoft Metashape vs Trailforks
- Agisoft Metashape vs Atlas.co
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Felt
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geographic Calculator
- Agisoft Metashape vs Esri ArcGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs LocationIQ
- Agisoft Metashape vs Mapzen
- Agisoft Metashape vs OsmAnd
- Agisoft Metashape vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Agisoft Metashape vs Mapbox
- Agisoft Metashape vs Google Maps Platform
- Agisoft Metashape vs Apple Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs CARTO
- Agisoft Metashape vs Bing Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Citymapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Gaia GPS
- Agisoft Metashape vs WhiteboxTools
- HERE Technologies vs QGIS
- HERE Technologies vs Correlator3D
- HERE Technologies vs Global Mapper
- HERE Technologies vs Cesium ion
- HERE Technologies vs Potree
- HERE Technologies vs Leica Infinity
- HERE Technologies vs Emlid Studio
- HERE Technologies vs onX Maps
- HERE Technologies vs SW Maps
- HERE Technologies vs Fused
- HERE Technologies vs Lonboard
- HERE Technologies vs Trailforks
- HERE Technologies vs Atlas.co
- HERE Technologies vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- HERE Technologies vs Felt
- HERE Technologies vs Geographic Calculator
- HERE Technologies vs Esri ArcGIS
- HERE Technologies vs LocationIQ
- HERE Technologies vs Mapzen
- HERE Technologies vs OsmAnd
- HERE Technologies vs TomTom Developer Portal
- HERE Technologies vs Mapbox
- HERE Technologies vs Google Maps Platform
- HERE Technologies vs Apple Maps
- HERE Technologies vs CARTO
- HERE Technologies vs Bing Maps
- HERE Technologies vs Citymapper
- HERE Technologies vs Gaia GPS
- HERE Technologies vs WhiteboxTools
