Maps · head to head
Agisoft Metashape vs SW Maps

Agisoft Metashape
Maps
Desktop photogrammetry that turns photographs into point clouds, meshes, orthomosaics and DEMs
- From
- $179/one-time
- Rated
- -

SW Maps
Maps
Free Android GIS data collector that pairs with external RTK GNSS receivers
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only SW Maps has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Agisoft Metashape processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.; SW Maps android only. There is no iOS version and no sign of one, which rules it out for organisations that issue iPhones and iPads to field staff.
- They diverge on capability: Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, SW Maps covers Custom feature layers.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Agisoft Metashape and SW Maps actually diverge.
| Attribute | Agisoft Metashape | SW Maps |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $179/one-time | Free |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Android |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Agisoft Metashape
- Structure-from-motion alignment
- Dense point cloud generation
- Mesh and texture
- Orthomosaic and DEM
- Ground control points
- Point cloud classification
- Multispectral processing
- Python and Java scripting
Only in SW Maps
- Custom feature layers
- External GNSS support
- Offline basemaps
- Geospatial PDF layers
- Vector import
- Photo and media capture
- Export formats
- NTRIP client
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Agisoft Metashape
- A survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud creditsnot SW Maps
- A quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitivenot SW Maps
- An archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscriptionnot SW Maps
- A VFX or games studio scanning props and environments, where Standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevantnot SW Maps
SW Maps
- An NGO or municipal utility mapping water points, pipe networks or road assets on a budget that cannot absorb per-user GIS subscriptionsnot Agisoft Metashape
- A survey team pairing a low-cost RTK receiver with Android tablets to collect centimetre-accurate attributed features without buying field software seatsnot Agisoft Metashape
- A university field course teaching GNSS data collection where every student needs the tool on their own devicenot Agisoft Metashape
- A consultant doing a one-off asset inventory who needs shapefile or GeoPackage output and does not want to start an annual subscription for a three-week jobnot Agisoft Metashape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Agisoft Metashape
- Processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.
- The vendor is a Russian company, and since 2022 payment is restricted to wire transfer, ACH and SEPA direct debit with no card payment, which some corporate and government procurement departments simply cannot process.
- There is no collaboration layer: no shared projects, no web viewer, no permissions. Sharing results means sending files, which is a real limitation on multi-office teams.
- Support is thin compared with commercial drone platforms, and the software assumes photogrammetric competence; users who do not understand overlap, ground control and residuals produce confidently wrong models.
- A node-locked licence is tied to a machine, and moving it or covering a second workstation means either a reseller-quoted floating licence or buying twice, which erodes the cost advantage for teams rather than individuals.
SW Maps
- Android only. There is no iOS version and no sign of one, which rules it out for organisations that issue iPhones and iPads to field staff.
- There is no back end: no user management, no central project sync, no audit trail. Data lives on the device until someone exports it, and a lost tablet is lost data.
- No commercial support contract exists, so an organisation with a compliance requirement for vendor support cannot use it for regulated work regardless of technical fit.
- It is maintained by a small consultancy as a side product of its own project work, so the roadmap follows Softwel’s needs and a feature you depend on may never be prioritised.
- Form logic is basic compared with dedicated survey platforms: no meaningful skip logic, validation or multi-user assignment, so complex questionnaires quickly outgrow it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Agisoft Metashape
$179/one-time- Standard$179/one-time
- Photogrammetric alignment, dense cloud, mesh and texture
- No georeferencing or coordinate systems
- No ground control points
- Professional$3499/one-time
- Everything in Standard
- Georeferencing, coordinate systems and ground control points
- Orthomosaic, DEM and point cloud classification
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared across machines rather than node-locked
- Sold through authorised resellers only
- Quoted rather than listed
SW Maps
Free- SW MapsFree
- All features included
- External RTK GNSS support
- Unlimited layers and exports
Which should you pick?
Choose Agisoft Metashape if
- You need structure-from-motion alignment.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want dense point cloud generation.
Choose SW Maps if
- You need custom feature layers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Android.
- You also want external gnss support.
Questions people ask
- Is Agisoft Metashape or SW Maps better?
- Neither clearly leads. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and SW Maps at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Agisoft Metashape or SW Maps?
- SW Maps has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $179/one-time for Agisoft Metashape and Free for SW Maps.
- Does Agisoft Metashape or SW Maps run on more platforms?
- Agisoft Metashape runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. SW Maps runs on Android.
- Can I use SW Maps for free?
- Yes. SW Maps has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time.
- What is Agisoft Metashape best used for?
- Agisoft Metashape is most often used for a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits, a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive, an archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscription, a vfx or games studio scanning props and environments, where standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevant. Of those, a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits and a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive are not what SW Maps is typically brought in for.
- What can Agisoft Metashape do that SW Maps cannot?
- Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Dense point cloud generation, Mesh and texture, Orthomosaic and DEM. SW Maps covers Custom feature layers, External GNSS support, Offline basemaps, Geospatial PDF layers.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Agisoft Metashape: How much does Metashape cost?
Professional is $3,499 and Standard is $179, both node-locked. Floating licences are quoted through resellers.
SW Maps: Is SW Maps really free?
Yes. It is free with no advertising and no paid tier. There is no subscription and no feature paywall.
Agisoft Metashape: Is it a subscription?
No. These are perpetual node-locked licences. Major version upgrades are charged separately.
SW Maps: Does it support RTK receivers?
Yes, over Bluetooth or USB serial, with NTRIP correction support, antenna height and per-point fix quality recording.
Agisoft Metashape: What is the difference between Standard and Professional?
Standard has no georeferencing, coordinate systems, ground control points, orthomosaic export or scripting. Anything survey or mapping related requires Professional.
SW Maps: Is there an iOS version?
No. Android only.
Agisoft Metashape: Does it process in the cloud?
No. All processing is local on your own hardware, which is the main reason it is cheap at volume and slow on weak machines.
SW Maps: Who maintains it?
Softwel, an engineering consultancy in Kathmandu, Nepal, which built it for its own infrastructure projects.
Agisoft Metashape: Are there educational licences?
Yes, Agisoft offers reduced academic pricing on a separate page.
SW Maps: Can we get support?
Not contractually. There is no commercial support agreement, which is the main reason organisations with compliance obligations choose a paid alternative.
Related pages
More on Agisoft Metashape
Other head to heads
- Agisoft Metashape vs QGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Correlator3D
- Agisoft Metashape vs Global Mapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Cesium ion
- Agisoft Metashape vs Potree
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leica Infinity
- Agisoft Metashape vs Emlid Studio
- Agisoft Metashape vs onX Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Fused
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lonboard
- Agisoft Metashape vs Trailforks
- Agisoft Metashape vs Atlas.co
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Felt
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geographic Calculator
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Agisoft Metashape vs IndoorAtlas
- Agisoft Metashape vs Mapbox
- Agisoft Metashape vs Google Maps Platform
- Agisoft Metashape vs Gaia GPS
- Agisoft Metashape vs GraphHopper
- Agisoft Metashape vs GRASS GIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs HERE WeGo
- Agisoft Metashape vs Esri ArcGIS
- SW Maps vs QGIS
- SW Maps vs Correlator3D
- SW Maps vs Global Mapper
- SW Maps vs Cesium ion
- SW Maps vs Potree
- SW Maps vs Leica Infinity
- SW Maps vs Emlid Studio
- SW Maps vs onX Maps
- SW Maps vs Fused
- SW Maps vs Lonboard
- SW Maps vs Trailforks
- SW Maps vs Atlas.co
- SW Maps vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- SW Maps vs Felt
- SW Maps vs Geographic Calculator
- SW Maps vs ArcGIS Survey123
- SW Maps vs IndoorAtlas
- SW Maps vs Mapbox
- SW Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- SW Maps vs Gaia GPS
- SW Maps vs GraphHopper
- SW Maps vs GRASS GIS
- SW Maps vs HERE WeGo
- SW Maps vs Esri ArcGIS
