Maps · head to head
Agisoft Metashape vs OpenRouteService

Agisoft Metashape
Maps
Desktop photogrammetry that turns photographs into point clouds, meshes, orthomosaics and DEMs
- From
- $179/one-time
- Rated
- -

OpenRouteService
Maps
Open-source routing, geocoding, and isochrone APIs based on OpenStreetMap data for developers and enterprises
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenRouteService has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Agisoft Metashape processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.; OpenRouteService free tier limited to 500 Isochrones requests per day
- They diverge on capability: Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, OpenRouteService covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Agisoft Metashape and OpenRouteService actually diverge.
| Attribute | Agisoft Metashape | OpenRouteService |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $179/one-time | Free |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Agisoft Metashape
- Structure-from-motion alignment
- Dense point cloud generation
- Mesh and texture
- Orthomosaic and DEM
- Ground control points
- Point cloud classification
- Multispectral processing
- Python and Java scripting
Only in OpenRouteService
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Agisoft Metashape
- A survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud creditsnot OpenRouteService
- A quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitivenot OpenRouteService
- An archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscriptionnot OpenRouteService
- A VFX or games studio scanning props and environments, where Standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevantnot OpenRouteService
OpenRouteService
- Directions routing for cars, trucks, bikes, walking, hiking, wheelchairnot Agisoft Metashape
- Reachability analysis with isochrones for time and distance calculationsnot Agisoft Metashape
- Many-to-many distance matrix calculationsnot Agisoft Metashape
- Location geocoding and conversion to coordinatesnot Agisoft Metashape
- Points of interest discovery and mappingnot Agisoft Metashape
- Elevation data enrichment using SRTM satellite datanot Agisoft Metashape
- Vehicle routing problem optimizationnot Agisoft Metashape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Agisoft Metashape
- Processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.
- The vendor is a Russian company, and since 2022 payment is restricted to wire transfer, ACH and SEPA direct debit with no card payment, which some corporate and government procurement departments simply cannot process.
- There is no collaboration layer: no shared projects, no web viewer, no permissions. Sharing results means sending files, which is a real limitation on multi-office teams.
- Support is thin compared with commercial drone platforms, and the software assumes photogrammetric competence; users who do not understand overlap, ground control and residuals produce confidently wrong models.
- A node-locked licence is tied to a machine, and moving it or covering a second workstation means either a reseller-quoted floating licence or buying twice, which erodes the cost advantage for teams rather than individuals.
OpenRouteService
- Free tier limited to 500 Isochrones requests per day
- API restrictions exist but details not fully documented on main page
- Specific pricing tiers and costs not published on primary website
Pricing, plan by plan
Agisoft Metashape
$179/one-time- Standard$179/one-time
- Photogrammetric alignment, dense cloud, mesh and texture
- No georeferencing or coordinate systems
- No ground control points
- Professional$3499/one-time
- Everything in Standard
- Georeferencing, coordinate systems and ground control points
- Orthomosaic, DEM and point cloud classification
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared across machines rather than node-locked
- Sold through authorised resellers only
- Quoted rather than listed
OpenRouteService
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the OpenRouteService review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Agisoft Metashape if
- You need structure-from-motion alignment.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want dense point cloud generation.
Choose OpenRouteService if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Agisoft Metashape or OpenRouteService better?
- Neither clearly leads. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and OpenRouteService at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Agisoft Metashape or OpenRouteService?
- OpenRouteService has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $179/one-time for Agisoft Metashape and Free for OpenRouteService.
- Does Agisoft Metashape or OpenRouteService run on more platforms?
- Agisoft Metashape runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. OpenRouteService runs on Web.
- Can I use OpenRouteService for free?
- Yes. OpenRouteService has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time.
- What is Agisoft Metashape best used for?
- Agisoft Metashape is most often used for a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits, a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive, an archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscription, a vfx or games studio scanning props and environments, where standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevant. Of those, a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits and a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive are not what OpenRouteService is typically brought in for.
- What can Agisoft Metashape do that OpenRouteService cannot?
- Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Dense point cloud generation, Mesh and texture, Orthomosaic and DEM. OpenRouteService covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Agisoft Metashape: How much does Metashape cost?
Professional is $3,499 and Standard is $179, both node-locked. Floating licences are quoted through resellers.
OpenRouteService: How much does OpenRouteService cost?
OpenRouteService is free to use and open source. The free tier includes up to 500 Isochrones requests per day. Specific pricing for higher usage tiers is not published on the main pricing page.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Is it a subscription?
No. These are perpetual node-locked licences. Major version upgrades are charged separately.
OpenRouteService: Is there a free version of OpenRouteService?
Yes, OpenRouteService is completely free to use and built on open source technology. All services are presented as free to use and based on user-generated and collaboratively collected geographic data from OpenStreetMap.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: What is the difference between Standard and Professional?
Standard has no georeferencing, coordinate systems, ground control points, orthomosaic export or scripting. Anything survey or mapping related requires Professional.
Agisoft Metashape: Does it process in the cloud?
No. All processing is local on your own hardware, which is the main reason it is cheap at volume and slow on weak machines.
Agisoft Metashape: Are there educational licences?
Yes, Agisoft offers reduced academic pricing on a separate page.
Related pages
More on Agisoft Metashape
More on OpenRouteService
Other head to heads
- Agisoft Metashape vs QGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Correlator3D
- Agisoft Metashape vs Global Mapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Cesium ion
- Agisoft Metashape vs Potree
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leica Infinity
- Agisoft Metashape vs Emlid Studio
- Agisoft Metashape vs onX Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs SW Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Fused
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lonboard
- Agisoft Metashape vs Trailforks
- Agisoft Metashape vs Atlas.co
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Felt
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geographic Calculator
- Agisoft Metashape vs Google Maps Platform
- Agisoft Metashape vs Mapbox
- Agisoft Metashape vs HERE Technologies
- Agisoft Metashape vs Apple Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geoapify
- Agisoft Metashape vs LocationIQ
- Agisoft Metashape vs Stadia Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs OsmAnd
- Agisoft Metashape vs Bing Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs GraphHopper
- Agisoft Metashape vs MapTiler
- Agisoft Metashape vs MAPS.ME
- Agisoft Metashape vs OSRM
- Agisoft Metashape vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- Agisoft Metashape vs PositionStack
- Agisoft Metashape vs Radar
- Agisoft Metashape vs SAGA GIS
- OpenRouteService vs QGIS
- OpenRouteService vs Correlator3D
- OpenRouteService vs Global Mapper
- OpenRouteService vs Cesium ion
- OpenRouteService vs Potree
- OpenRouteService vs Leica Infinity
- OpenRouteService vs Emlid Studio
- OpenRouteService vs onX Maps
- OpenRouteService vs SW Maps
- OpenRouteService vs Fused
- OpenRouteService vs Lonboard
- OpenRouteService vs Trailforks
- OpenRouteService vs Atlas.co
- OpenRouteService vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- OpenRouteService vs Felt
- OpenRouteService vs Geographic Calculator
- OpenRouteService vs Google Maps Platform
- OpenRouteService vs Mapbox
- OpenRouteService vs HERE Technologies
- OpenRouteService vs Apple Maps
- OpenRouteService vs Geoapify
- OpenRouteService vs LocationIQ
- OpenRouteService vs Stadia Maps
- OpenRouteService vs OsmAnd
- OpenRouteService vs Bing Maps
- OpenRouteService vs GraphHopper
- OpenRouteService vs MapTiler
- OpenRouteService vs MAPS.ME
- OpenRouteService vs OSRM
- OpenRouteService vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- OpenRouteService vs PositionStack
- OpenRouteService vs Radar
- OpenRouteService vs SAGA GIS
