Maps · head to head
Agisoft Metashape vs Correlator3D

Agisoft Metashape
Maps
Desktop photogrammetry that turns photographs into point clouds, meshes, orthomosaics and DEMs
- From
- $179/one-time
- Rated
- -

Correlator3D
Maps
SimActive photogrammetry with a published price list and a perpetual licence still on sale
- From
- $295/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Agisoft Metashape processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.; Correlator3D the standard licence caps at 61 megapixel sensors, so an operator moving to a medium or large format camera has to buy a different and separately quoted licence rather than paying an upgrade fee.
- They diverge on capability: Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Correlator3D covers Aerial triangulation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Agisoft Metashape and Correlator3D actually diverge.
| Attribute | Agisoft Metashape | Correlator3D |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $179/one-time | $295/month |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows |
Identical on both: pricing model (One-time purchase), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Agisoft Metashape
- Structure-from-motion alignment
- Dense point cloud generation
- Mesh and texture
- Orthomosaic and DEM
- Ground control points
- Point cloud classification
- Multispectral processing
- Python and Java scripting
Only in Correlator3D
- Aerial triangulation
- DSM and DTM generation
- Orthomosaic production
- Point cloud and 3D mesh output
- Feature extraction
- GPU acceleration
- Satellite imagery support
- Batch and unattended processing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Agisoft Metashape
- A survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud creditsnot Correlator3D
- A quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitivenot Correlator3D
- An archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscriptionnot Correlator3D
- A VFX or games studio scanning props and environments, where Standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevantnot Correlator3D
Correlator3D
- An aerial survey company processing large photographic blocks where per-project cloud credits would be more expensive than owning a licencenot Agisoft Metashape
- A national or regional mapping agency that needs software it can run offline on classified or restricted imagerynot Agisoft Metashape
- A drone service provider producing bare-earth terrain models for volumetrics and corridor mapping at high throughputnot Agisoft Metashape
- An organisation that wants a perpetual licence because a multi-year subscription cannot be justified against its capital budgeting rulesnot Agisoft Metashape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Agisoft Metashape
- Processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.
- The vendor is a Russian company, and since 2022 payment is restricted to wire transfer, ACH and SEPA direct debit with no card payment, which some corporate and government procurement departments simply cannot process.
- There is no collaboration layer: no shared projects, no web viewer, no permissions. Sharing results means sending files, which is a real limitation on multi-office teams.
- Support is thin compared with commercial drone platforms, and the software assumes photogrammetric competence; users who do not understand overlap, ground control and residuals produce confidently wrong models.
- A node-locked licence is tied to a machine, and moving it or covering a second workstation means either a reseller-quoted floating licence or buying twice, which erodes the cost advantage for teams rather than individuals.
Correlator3D
- The standard licence caps at 61 megapixel sensors, so an operator moving to a medium or large format camera has to buy a different and separately quoted licence rather than paying an upgrade fee.
- It is Windows desktop only with no cloud processing option, so throughput is bounded by the workstation and GPU you buy, and there is no way to burst capacity for one large job.
- There is no collaboration layer, client portal or field application, so deliverable sharing, review and version control all have to be handled by other software.
- The interface and workflow are built for photogrammetry specialists; an occasional drone operator will find the learning curve steeper than a consumer-oriented mapping package.
- The perpetual licence includes only one year of support and updates, and staying current afterwards means paying maintenance, so the headline $5,900 is not the whole long-term cost.
Pricing, plan by plan
Agisoft Metashape
$179/one-time- Standard$179/one-time
- Photogrammetric alignment, dense cloud, mesh and texture
- No georeferencing or coordinate systems
- No ground control points
- Professional$3499/one-time
- Everything in Standard
- Georeferencing, coordinate systems and ground control points
- Orthomosaic, DEM and point cloud classification
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared across machines rather than node-locked
- Sold through authorised resellers only
- Quoted rather than listed
Correlator3D
$295/month- Monthly subscription$295/month
- Unlimited images
- Sensors up to 61 megapixels
- All modules and tools
- Yearly subscription$2950/year
- Unlimited images
- Sensors up to 61 megapixels
- All modules and tools
- Permanent licence$5900/one-time
- Perpetual licence
- Unlimited images up to 61 megapixels
- All modules and tools
- Permanent floating licence$6400/one-time
- Perpetual floating licence shared across machines
- Unlimited images up to 61 megapixels
- One year of support and updates included
Which should you pick?
Choose Agisoft Metashape if
- You need structure-from-motion alignment.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want dense point cloud generation.
Choose Correlator3D if
- You need aerial triangulation.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want dsm and dtm generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Agisoft Metashape or Correlator3D better?
- Neither clearly leads. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and Correlator3D at $295/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Agisoft Metashape or Correlator3D?
- Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and Correlator3D at $295/month.
- Does Agisoft Metashape or Correlator3D run on more platforms?
- Agisoft Metashape runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. Correlator3D runs on Windows.
- What is Agisoft Metashape best used for?
- Agisoft Metashape is most often used for a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits, a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive, an archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscription, a vfx or games studio scanning props and environments, where standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevant. Of those, a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits and a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive are not what Correlator3D is typically brought in for.
- What can Agisoft Metashape do that Correlator3D cannot?
- Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Dense point cloud generation, Mesh and texture, Orthomosaic and DEM. Correlator3D covers Aerial triangulation, DSM and DTM generation, Orthomosaic production, Point cloud and 3D mesh output.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Agisoft Metashape: How much does Metashape cost?
Professional is $3,499 and Standard is $179, both node-locked. Floating licences are quoted through resellers.
Correlator3D: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
Yes. $5,900 for a permanent licence and $6,400 for a permanent floating licence, each including a year of support and updates.
Agisoft Metashape: Is it a subscription?
No. These are perpetual node-locked licences. Major version upgrades are charged separately.
Correlator3D: What limits the standard licence?
Sensor resolution, up to 61 megapixels. Medium format, large format and satellite imagery need separately priced licences.
Agisoft Metashape: What is the difference between Standard and Professional?
Standard has no georeferencing, coordinate systems, ground control points, orthomosaic export or scripting. Anything survey or mapping related requires Professional.
Correlator3D: Is there a cloud version?
No. Processing runs on your own Windows workstation. SimActive offers a data processing service as an alternative to buying the software.
Agisoft Metashape: Does it process in the cloud?
No. All processing is local on your own hardware, which is the main reason it is cheap at volume and slow on weak machines.
Correlator3D: Does it handle satellite imagery?
Yes, under a separate satellite licence class quoted on request.
Agisoft Metashape: Are there educational licences?
Yes, Agisoft offers reduced academic pricing on a separate page.
Related pages
More on Agisoft Metashape
More on Correlator3D
Other head to heads
- Agisoft Metashape vs QGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Global Mapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Cesium ion
- Agisoft Metashape vs Potree
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leica Infinity
- Agisoft Metashape vs Emlid Studio
- Agisoft Metashape vs onX Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs SW Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Fused
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lonboard
- Agisoft Metashape vs Trailforks
- Agisoft Metashape vs Atlas.co
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Felt
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geographic Calculator
- Agisoft Metashape vs Bing Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Gaia GPS
- Agisoft Metashape vs CesiumJS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Mappedin
- Agisoft Metashape vs Navmii GPS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Nominatim
- Agisoft Metashape vs OpenLayers
- Agisoft Metashape vs OpenRouteService
- Agisoft Metashape vs OpenStreetMap
- Agisoft Metashape vs OsmAnd
- Correlator3D vs QGIS
- Correlator3D vs Global Mapper
- Correlator3D vs Cesium ion
- Correlator3D vs Potree
- Correlator3D vs Leica Infinity
- Correlator3D vs Emlid Studio
- Correlator3D vs onX Maps
- Correlator3D vs SW Maps
- Correlator3D vs Fused
- Correlator3D vs Lonboard
- Correlator3D vs Trailforks
- Correlator3D vs Atlas.co
- Correlator3D vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Correlator3D vs Felt
- Correlator3D vs Geographic Calculator
- Correlator3D vs Bing Maps
- Correlator3D vs Gaia GPS
- Correlator3D vs CesiumJS
- Correlator3D vs Mappedin
- Correlator3D vs Navmii GPS
- Correlator3D vs Nominatim
- Correlator3D vs OpenLayers
- Correlator3D vs OpenRouteService
- Correlator3D vs OpenStreetMap
- Correlator3D vs OsmAnd
