Maps · head to head
Agisoft Metashape vs MapTiler

Agisoft Metashape
Maps
Desktop photogrammetry that turns photographs into point clouds, meshes, orthomosaics and DEMs
- From
- $179/one-time
- Rated
- -

MapTiler
Maps
Map hosting, styling, and APIs for developers with beautiful pre-built map styles
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only MapTiler has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Agisoft Metashape processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.; MapTiler the free tier is restricted to testing, personal or non commercial use and forces a MapTiler logo on the map
- They diverge on capability: Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, MapTiler covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Agisoft Metashape and MapTiler actually diverge.
| Attribute | Agisoft Metashape | MapTiler |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $179/one-time | Free |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Agisoft Metashape
- Structure-from-motion alignment
- Dense point cloud generation
- Mesh and texture
- Orthomosaic and DEM
- Ground control points
- Point cloud classification
- Multispectral processing
- Python and Java scripting
Only in MapTiler
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Agisoft Metashape
- A survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud creditsnot MapTiler
- A quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitivenot MapTiler
- An archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscriptionnot MapTiler
- A VFX or games studio scanning props and environments, where Standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevantnot MapTiler
MapTiler
- Web and mobile mapping applicationsnot Agisoft Metashape
- Vector tile and raster map hostingnot Agisoft Metashape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Agisoft Metashape
- Processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.
- The vendor is a Russian company, and since 2022 payment is restricted to wire transfer, ACH and SEPA direct debit with no card payment, which some corporate and government procurement departments simply cannot process.
- There is no collaboration layer: no shared projects, no web viewer, no permissions. Sharing results means sending files, which is a real limitation on multi-office teams.
- Support is thin compared with commercial drone platforms, and the software assumes photogrammetric competence; users who do not understand overlap, ground control and residuals produce confidently wrong models.
- A node-locked licence is tied to a machine, and moving it or covering a second workstation means either a reseller-quoted floating licence or buying twice, which erodes the cost advantage for teams rather than individuals.
MapTiler
- The free tier is restricted to testing, personal or non commercial use and forces a MapTiler logo on the map
- Free is capped at 5,000 map sessions, 1,000 search sessions and 100,000 API requests a month
- Free storage is 5 GB but limited to a single file
- The Flex plan at $30 a month bills overage at $2.50 per 1,000 sessions and $0.15 per 1,000 API requests
- Soft usage limits that prevent surprise overage bills are a Custom plan feature, so cheaper plans can run up charges
- A 99.9% SLA requires the prepaid Custom contract
Pricing, plan by plan
Agisoft Metashape
$179/one-time- Standard$179/one-time
- Photogrammetric alignment, dense cloud, mesh and texture
- No georeferencing or coordinate systems
- No ground control points
- Professional$3499/one-time
- Everything in Standard
- Georeferencing, coordinate systems and ground control points
- Orthomosaic, DEM and point cloud classification
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared across machines rather than node-locked
- Sold through authorised resellers only
- Quoted rather than listed
MapTiler
Free- FreeFree
- 5 GB storage
- 1 file maximum
- 5,000 monthly sessions
- Flex$30/monthly
- 10 GB storage
- 25,000 monthly sessions
- 500,000 monthly API requests
- Custom$null/prepaid
- Custom storage and monthly sessions
- Custom API request limits
- 99.9 percent SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Agisoft Metashape if
- You need structure-from-motion alignment.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want dense point cloud generation.
Choose MapTiler if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Agisoft Metashape or MapTiler better?
- Neither clearly leads. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and MapTiler at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Agisoft Metashape or MapTiler?
- MapTiler has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $179/one-time for Agisoft Metashape and Free for MapTiler.
- Does Agisoft Metashape or MapTiler run on more platforms?
- Agisoft Metashape runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. MapTiler runs on Web.
- Can I use MapTiler for free?
- Yes. MapTiler has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time.
- What is Agisoft Metashape best used for?
- Agisoft Metashape is most often used for a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits, a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive, an archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscription, a vfx or games studio scanning props and environments, where standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevant. Of those, a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits and a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive are not what MapTiler is typically brought in for.
- What can Agisoft Metashape do that MapTiler cannot?
- Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Dense point cloud generation, Mesh and texture, Orthomosaic and DEM. MapTiler covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Agisoft Metashape: How much does Metashape cost?
Professional is $3,499 and Standard is $179, both node-locked. Floating licences are quoted through resellers.
MapTiler: What happens if I exceed my session or API request limits on the Flex plan?
On the Flex plan, overage charges apply when you exceed limits. Sessions cost $2.50 per 1,000 over the monthly limit of 25,000. API requests cost $0.15 per 1,000 over the 500,000 monthly limit. Additional storage of 100 GB costs $20 per month.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Is it a subscription?
No. These are perpetual node-locked licences. Major version upgrades are charged separately.
MapTiler: Can I use the Free plan for commercial projects?
No, the Free plan is restricted to testing, personal, or non-commercial use only. Commercial use is only permitted on the Flex plan ($30/month) or Custom plans with prepaid volume contracts.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: What is the difference between Standard and Professional?
Standard has no georeferencing, coordinate systems, ground control points, orthomosaic export or scripting. Anything survey or mapping related requires Professional.
MapTiler: What is the difference between Flex and Custom plans?
The Flex plan costs $30 per month with preset limits and pay-as-you-go overages. Custom plans are negotiated per customer for high-traffic use cases and include 99.9 percent SLA, team account support, and prepaid volume contracts. All prices are in USD excluding VAT.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Does it process in the cloud?
No. All processing is local on your own hardware, which is the main reason it is cheap at volume and slow on weak machines.
Agisoft Metashape: Are there educational licences?
Yes, Agisoft offers reduced academic pricing on a separate page.
Related pages
More on Agisoft Metashape
Other head to heads
- Agisoft Metashape vs QGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Correlator3D
- Agisoft Metashape vs Global Mapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Cesium ion
- Agisoft Metashape vs Potree
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leica Infinity
- Agisoft Metashape vs Emlid Studio
- Agisoft Metashape vs onX Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs SW Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Fused
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lonboard
- Agisoft Metashape vs Trailforks
- Agisoft Metashape vs Atlas.co
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Felt
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geographic Calculator
- Agisoft Metashape vs Google Maps Platform
- Agisoft Metashape vs Mapbox
- Agisoft Metashape vs HERE Technologies
- Agisoft Metashape vs Apple Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Bing Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geoapify
- Agisoft Metashape vs OpenRouteService
- Agisoft Metashape vs Stadia Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leaflet
- Agisoft Metashape vs Kepler.gl
- Agisoft Metashape vs OSRM
- Agisoft Metashape vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- Agisoft Metashape vs PositionStack
- Agisoft Metashape vs Radar
- Agisoft Metashape vs SAGA GIS
- MapTiler vs QGIS
- MapTiler vs Correlator3D
- MapTiler vs Global Mapper
- MapTiler vs Cesium ion
- MapTiler vs Potree
- MapTiler vs Leica Infinity
- MapTiler vs Emlid Studio
- MapTiler vs onX Maps
- MapTiler vs SW Maps
- MapTiler vs Fused
- MapTiler vs Lonboard
- MapTiler vs Trailforks
- MapTiler vs Atlas.co
- MapTiler vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- MapTiler vs Felt
- MapTiler vs Geographic Calculator
- MapTiler vs Google Maps Platform
- MapTiler vs Mapbox
- MapTiler vs HERE Technologies
- MapTiler vs Apple Maps
- MapTiler vs Bing Maps
- MapTiler vs Geoapify
- MapTiler vs OpenRouteService
- MapTiler vs Stadia Maps
- MapTiler vs TomTom Developer Portal
- MapTiler vs Leaflet
- MapTiler vs Kepler.gl
- MapTiler vs OSRM
- MapTiler vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- MapTiler vs PositionStack
- MapTiler vs Radar
- MapTiler vs SAGA GIS
