Maps · head to head
Correlator3D vs GraphHopper

Correlator3D
Maps
SimActive photogrammetry with a published price list and a perpetual licence still on sale
- From
- $295/month
- Rated
- -

GraphHopper
Maps
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Correlator3D the standard licence caps at 61 megapixel sensors, so an operator moving to a medium or large format camera has to buy a different and separately quoted licence rather than paying an upgrade fee.; GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only
- They diverge on capability: Correlator3D covers Aerial triangulation, GraphHopper covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Correlator3D and GraphHopper actually diverge.
| Attribute | Correlator3D | GraphHopper |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $295/month | On request |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | freemium |
| Platforms | Windows | Web |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Correlator3D
- Aerial triangulation
- DSM and DTM generation
- Orthomosaic production
- Point cloud and 3D mesh output
- Feature extraction
- GPU acceleration
- Satellite imagery support
- Batch and unattended processing
Only in GraphHopper
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Correlator3D
- An aerial survey company processing large photographic blocks where per-project cloud credits would be more expensive than owning a licencenot GraphHopper
- A national or regional mapping agency that needs software it can run offline on classified or restricted imagerynot GraphHopper
- A drone service provider producing bare-earth terrain models for volumetrics and corridor mapping at high throughputnot GraphHopper
- An organisation that wants a perpetual licence because a multi-year subscription cannot be justified against its capital budgeting rulesnot GraphHopper
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot Correlator3D
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot Correlator3D
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Correlator3D
- The standard licence caps at 61 megapixel sensors, so an operator moving to a medium or large format camera has to buy a different and separately quoted licence rather than paying an upgrade fee.
- It is Windows desktop only with no cloud processing option, so throughput is bounded by the workstation and GPU you buy, and there is no way to burst capacity for one large job.
- There is no collaboration layer, client portal or field application, so deliverable sharing, review and version control all have to be handled by other software.
- The interface and workflow are built for photogrammetry specialists; an occasional drone operator will find the learning curve steeper than a consumer-oriented mapping package.
- The perpetual licence includes only one year of support and updates, and staying current afterwards means paying maintenance, so the headline $5,900 is not the whole long-term cost.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
Pricing, plan by plan
Correlator3D
$295/month- Monthly subscription$295/month
- Unlimited images
- Sensors up to 61 megapixels
- All modules and tools
- Yearly subscription$2950/year
- Unlimited images
- Sensors up to 61 megapixels
- All modules and tools
- Permanent licence$5900/one-time
- Perpetual licence
- Unlimited images up to 61 megapixels
- All modules and tools
- Permanent floating licence$6400/one-time
- Perpetual floating licence shared across machines
- Unlimited images up to 61 megapixels
- One year of support and updates included
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Correlator3D if
- You need aerial triangulation.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want dsm and dtm generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Correlator3D or GraphHopper better?
- Neither clearly leads. Correlator3D starts at $295/month and GraphHopper at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Correlator3D or GraphHopper?
- Correlator3D starts at $295/month and GraphHopper at On request.
- Does Correlator3D or GraphHopper run on more platforms?
- Correlator3D runs on Windows. GraphHopper runs on Web.
- What is Correlator3D best used for?
- Correlator3D is most often used for an aerial survey company processing large photographic blocks where per-project cloud credits would be more expensive than owning a licence, a national or regional mapping agency that needs software it can run offline on classified or restricted imagery, a drone service provider producing bare-earth terrain models for volumetrics and corridor mapping at high throughput, an organisation that wants a perpetual licence because a multi-year subscription cannot be justified against its capital budgeting rules. Of those, an aerial survey company processing large photographic blocks where per-project cloud credits would be more expensive than owning a licence and a national or regional mapping agency that needs software it can run offline on classified or restricted imagery are not what GraphHopper is typically brought in for.
- What can Correlator3D do that GraphHopper cannot?
- Correlator3D covers Aerial triangulation, DSM and DTM generation, Orthomosaic production, Point cloud and 3D mesh output. GraphHopper covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Correlator3D: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
Yes. $5,900 for a permanent licence and $6,400 for a permanent floating licence, each including a year of support and updates.
GraphHopper: Is the free plan actually usable for production?
No. The free tier is limited to non-commercial use only and includes 500 daily credits. To use GraphHopper in production, you need a paid plan starting at 69 euros per month.
SourceCorrelator3D: What limits the standard licence?
Sensor resolution, up to 61 megapixels. Medium format, large format and satellite imagery need separately priced licences.
GraphHopper: What happens if I exceed my daily credit limit?
The page does not specify. Each tier has a daily credit limit (500 for free, 5,000 for Basic, 15,000 for Standard, 50,000 for Premium), but no overage policy is documented.
SourceCorrelator3D: Is there a cloud version?
No. Processing runs on your own Windows workstation. SimActive offers a data processing service as an alternative to buying the software.
GraphHopper: Does GraphHopper offer a trial period?
No. There is no trial period. You can start with the free plan to test, but commercial use requires a paid subscription.
SourceCorrelator3D: Does it handle satellite imagery?
Yes, under a separate satellite licence class quoted on request.
GraphHopper: How much does the Premium plan cost and what do I get?
Premium is 479 euros per month and includes 50,000 daily credits, up to 200 locations per request, up to 20 vehicles, email and phone support, and access to all APIs including routing and optimization.
SourceGraphHopper: Is there a discount if I link back to GraphHopper?
Yes. A 20% discount is available with proper attribution. The page also mentions a 99.5% uptime SLA on paid plans only.
SourceRelated pages
More on Correlator3D
More on GraphHopper
Other head to heads
- Correlator3D vs QGIS
- Correlator3D vs Agisoft Metashape
- Correlator3D vs Emlid Studio
- Correlator3D vs Cesium ion
- Correlator3D vs Global Mapper
- Correlator3D vs Atlas.co
- Correlator3D vs Leica Infinity
- Correlator3D vs Bing Maps
- Correlator3D vs Gaia GPS
- Correlator3D vs Fused
- Correlator3D vs CesiumJS
- Correlator3D vs Mappedin
- Correlator3D vs Navmii GPS
- Correlator3D vs Nominatim
- Correlator3D vs OpenLayers
- Correlator3D vs OpenRouteService
- Correlator3D vs OpenStreetMap
- Correlator3D vs OsmAnd
- Correlator3D vs Google Maps Platform
- Correlator3D vs Apple Maps
- Correlator3D vs Mapbox
- Correlator3D vs HERE Technologies
- Correlator3D vs OSRM
- Correlator3D vs Ride with GPS
- Correlator3D vs Geoapify
- Correlator3D vs LocationIQ
- Correlator3D vs Stadia Maps
- Correlator3D vs GRASS GIS
- Correlator3D vs MapTiler
- Correlator3D vs onX Maps
- Correlator3D vs Potree
- Correlator3D vs SW Maps
- Correlator3D vs WhiteboxTools
- GraphHopper vs QGIS
- GraphHopper vs Agisoft Metashape
- GraphHopper vs Emlid Studio
- GraphHopper vs Cesium ion
- GraphHopper vs Global Mapper
- GraphHopper vs Atlas.co
- GraphHopper vs Leica Infinity
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs Gaia GPS
- GraphHopper vs Fused
- GraphHopper vs CesiumJS
- GraphHopper vs Mappedin
- GraphHopper vs Navmii GPS
- GraphHopper vs Nominatim
- GraphHopper vs OpenLayers
- GraphHopper vs OpenRouteService
- GraphHopper vs OpenStreetMap
- GraphHopper vs OsmAnd
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs OSRM
- GraphHopper vs Ride with GPS
- GraphHopper vs Geoapify
- GraphHopper vs LocationIQ
- GraphHopper vs Stadia Maps
- GraphHopper vs GRASS GIS
- GraphHopper vs MapTiler
- GraphHopper vs onX Maps
- GraphHopper vs Potree
- GraphHopper vs SW Maps
- GraphHopper vs WhiteboxTools
