Maps · head to head
Agisoft Metashape vs OSRM

Agisoft Metashape
Maps
Desktop photogrammetry that turns photographs into point clouds, meshes, orthomosaics and DEMs
- From
- $179/one-time
- Rated
- -
OSRM
Maps
High-performance open-source routing engine designed for OpenStreetMap data, providing fast route calculations
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OSRM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Agisoft Metashape processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.; OSRM free and open source routing engine under the 2-clause BSD license, no commercial tier
- They diverge on capability: Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, OSRM covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Agisoft Metashape and OSRM actually diverge.
| Attribute | Agisoft Metashape | OSRM |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $179/one-time | Free |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Agisoft Metashape
- Structure-from-motion alignment
- Dense point cloud generation
- Mesh and texture
- Orthomosaic and DEM
- Ground control points
- Point cloud classification
- Multispectral processing
- Python and Java scripting
Only in OSRM
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Agisoft Metashape
- A survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud creditsnot OSRM
- A quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitivenot OSRM
- An archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscriptionnot OSRM
- A VFX or games studio scanning props and environments, where Standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevantnot OSRM
OSRM
- Calculating efficient delivery routes across continental-sized road networks in millisecondsnot Agisoft Metashape
- Building navigation features for mobile apps without constructing routing infrastructurenot Agisoft Metashape
- Customizing route optimization for car, bicycle, and pedestrian transportation modesnot Agisoft Metashape
- Integrating OpenStreetMap data for real-time routing in web applicationsnot Agisoft Metashape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Agisoft Metashape
- Processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.
- The vendor is a Russian company, and since 2022 payment is restricted to wire transfer, ACH and SEPA direct debit with no card payment, which some corporate and government procurement departments simply cannot process.
- There is no collaboration layer: no shared projects, no web viewer, no permissions. Sharing results means sending files, which is a real limitation on multi-office teams.
- Support is thin compared with commercial drone platforms, and the software assumes photogrammetric competence; users who do not understand overlap, ground control and residuals produce confidently wrong models.
- A node-locked licence is tied to a machine, and moving it or covering a second workstation means either a reseller-quoted floating licence or buying twice, which erodes the cost advantage for teams rather than individuals.
OSRM
- Free and open source routing engine under the 2-clause BSD license, no commercial tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Agisoft Metashape
$179/one-time- Standard$179/one-time
- Photogrammetric alignment, dense cloud, mesh and texture
- No georeferencing or coordinate systems
- No ground control points
- Professional$3499/one-time
- Everything in Standard
- Georeferencing, coordinate systems and ground control points
- Orthomosaic, DEM and point cloud classification
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared across machines rather than node-locked
- Sold through authorised resellers only
- Quoted rather than listed
OSRM
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the OSRM review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Agisoft Metashape if
- You need structure-from-motion alignment.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want dense point cloud generation.
Choose OSRM if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Agisoft Metashape or OSRM better?
- Neither clearly leads. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and OSRM at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Agisoft Metashape or OSRM?
- OSRM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $179/one-time for Agisoft Metashape and Free for OSRM.
- Does Agisoft Metashape or OSRM run on more platforms?
- Agisoft Metashape runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. OSRM runs on Web.
- Can I use OSRM for free?
- Yes. OSRM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time.
- What is Agisoft Metashape best used for?
- Agisoft Metashape is most often used for a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits, a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive, an archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscription, a vfx or games studio scanning props and environments, where standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevant. Of those, a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits and a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive are not what OSRM is typically brought in for.
- What can Agisoft Metashape do that OSRM cannot?
- Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Dense point cloud generation, Mesh and texture, Orthomosaic and DEM. OSRM covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Agisoft Metashape: How much does Metashape cost?
Professional is $3,499 and Standard is $179, both node-locked. Floating licences are quoted through resellers.
OSRM: How much does Project OSRM cost?
Project OSRM is completely free and open source, distributed under the permissive 2-clause BSD license with no licensing costs or fees.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Is it a subscription?
No. These are perpetual node-locked licences. Major version upgrades are charged separately.
Agisoft Metashape: What is the difference between Standard and Professional?
Standard has no georeferencing, coordinate systems, ground control points, orthomosaic export or scripting. Anything survey or mapping related requires Professional.
Agisoft Metashape: Does it process in the cloud?
No. All processing is local on your own hardware, which is the main reason it is cheap at volume and slow on weak machines.
Agisoft Metashape: Are there educational licences?
Yes, Agisoft offers reduced academic pricing on a separate page.
Related pages
More on Agisoft Metashape
Other head to heads
- Agisoft Metashape vs QGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Correlator3D
- Agisoft Metashape vs Global Mapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Cesium ion
- Agisoft Metashape vs Potree
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leica Infinity
- Agisoft Metashape vs Emlid Studio
- Agisoft Metashape vs onX Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs SW Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Fused
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lonboard
- Agisoft Metashape vs Trailforks
- Agisoft Metashape vs Atlas.co
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Felt
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geographic Calculator
- Agisoft Metashape vs Mapbox
- Agisoft Metashape vs Google Maps Platform
- Agisoft Metashape vs HERE Technologies
- Agisoft Metashape vs Apple Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs GraphHopper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Stadia Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Ride with GPS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Gaia GPS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Nominatim
- Agisoft Metashape vs OpenLayers
- Agisoft Metashape vs OpenRouteService
- Agisoft Metashape vs OsmAnd
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Agisoft Metashape vs GRASS GIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs IndoorAtlas
- Agisoft Metashape vs HERE WeGo
- OSRM vs QGIS
- OSRM vs Correlator3D
- OSRM vs Global Mapper
- OSRM vs Cesium ion
- OSRM vs Potree
- OSRM vs Leica Infinity
- OSRM vs Emlid Studio
- OSRM vs onX Maps
- OSRM vs SW Maps
- OSRM vs Fused
- OSRM vs Lonboard
- OSRM vs Trailforks
- OSRM vs Atlas.co
- OSRM vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- OSRM vs Felt
- OSRM vs Geographic Calculator
- OSRM vs Mapbox
- OSRM vs Google Maps Platform
- OSRM vs HERE Technologies
- OSRM vs Apple Maps
- OSRM vs GraphHopper
- OSRM vs Stadia Maps
- OSRM vs Ride with GPS
- OSRM vs Gaia GPS
- OSRM vs Nominatim
- OSRM vs OpenLayers
- OSRM vs OpenRouteService
- OSRM vs OsmAnd
- OSRM vs ArcGIS Survey123
- OSRM vs GRASS GIS
- OSRM vs IndoorAtlas
- OSRM vs HERE WeGo
