Maps · head to head
Cesium ion vs GraphHopper

Cesium ion
Maps
Hosted 3D geospatial tiling and streaming, metered by storage, streaming and gigapixels
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

GraphHopper
Maps
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Cesium ion has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cesium ion streaming is metered in gigabytes a month, so a public-facing application's cost is driven by visitor traffic you do not control, and a successful launch can blow through a tier immediately.; GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only
- They diverge on capability: Cesium ion covers 3D Tiles tiling, GraphHopper covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cesium ion and GraphHopper actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cesium ion | GraphHopper |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per month by storage, streaming and gigapixels | freemium |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cesium ion
- 3D Tiles tiling
- Global terrain and imagery
- Google Photorealistic 3D Tiles
- Cloud reality modelling
- Streaming delivery
- Access tokens
- Geocoding
- Self-hosted option
Only in GraphHopper
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cesium ion
- A survey firm delivering a photogrammetry mesh to a client as a browser link rather than a 40 GB downloadnot GraphHopper
- A simulation team streaming global terrain and imagery into an Unreal Engine environmentnot GraphHopper
- An urban planning department publishing a city model that planners can inspect without desktop GIS softwarenot GraphHopper
- A software product embedding 3D geospatial views and needing hosted tiling rather than building a tilernot GraphHopper
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot Cesium ion
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot Cesium ion
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cesium ion
- Streaming is metered in gigabytes a month, so a public-facing application's cost is driven by visitor traffic you do not control, and a successful launch can blow through a tier immediately.
- Reality modelling is billed in gigapixels a month, an unfamiliar unit that makes it hard to estimate in advance how many drone flights a plan will actually cover.
- The free Community tier is restricted to non-commercial or open use, so a consultancy sharing a model with a paying client does not qualify regardless of how small the dataset is.
- Team accounts cost substantially more than individual ones at the same quota, $524 against $149 on Commercial, so adding a second colleague is a large step rather than an incremental seat charge.
- Self-hosting is available only under a custom enterprise agreement, which leaves organisations with data residency or air-gap requirements out of the published tiers entirely.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
Pricing, plan by plan
Cesium ion
Free- CommunityFree
- 5 GB storage
- 15 GB per month streaming
- 20 gigapixels per month reality modelling
- Commercial$149/month
- 50 GB storage
- 150 GB per month streaming
- 40 gigapixels per month reality modelling
- Premium$499/month
- 250 GB storage
- 500 GB per month streaming
- 100 gigapixels per month reality modelling
- Custom$undefined/year
- Negotiated quotas
- Self-hosted deployment in your own environment
- Enterprise support
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Cesium ion if
- You need 3d tiles tiling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want global terrain and imagery.
Questions people ask
- Is Cesium ion or GraphHopper better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cesium ion starts at Free and GraphHopper at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cesium ion or GraphHopper?
- Cesium ion has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Cesium ion and On request for GraphHopper.
- Does Cesium ion or GraphHopper run on more platforms?
- Cesium ion runs on Web, Cloud. GraphHopper runs on Web.
- Can I use Cesium ion for free?
- Yes. Cesium ion has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GraphHopper starts at On request.
- What is Cesium ion best used for?
- Cesium ion is most often used for a survey firm delivering a photogrammetry mesh to a client as a browser link rather than a 40 gb download, a simulation team streaming global terrain and imagery into an unreal engine environment, an urban planning department publishing a city model that planners can inspect without desktop gis software, a software product embedding 3d geospatial views and needing hosted tiling rather than building a tiler. Of those, a survey firm delivering a photogrammetry mesh to a client as a browser link rather than a 40 gb download and a simulation team streaming global terrain and imagery into an unreal engine environment are not what GraphHopper is typically brought in for.
- What can Cesium ion do that GraphHopper cannot?
- Cesium ion covers 3D Tiles tiling, Global terrain and imagery, Google Photorealistic 3D Tiles, Cloud reality modelling. GraphHopper covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cesium ion: How is Cesium ion priced?
By several meters at once: storage in gigabytes, streaming in gigabytes per month, and reality modelling in gigapixels per month. Commercial starts at $149 a month for an individual.
GraphHopper: Is the free plan actually usable for production?
No. The free tier is limited to non-commercial use only and includes 500 daily credits. To use GraphHopper in production, you need a paid plan starting at 69 euros per month.
SourceCesium ion: Is the free tier usable commercially?
No. Community is for non-commercial or open use. Commercial work needs a paid plan.
GraphHopper: What happens if I exceed my daily credit limit?
The page does not specify. Each tier has a daily credit limit (500 for free, 5,000 for Basic, 15,000 for Standard, 50,000 for Premium), but no overage policy is documented.
SourceCesium ion: Can I run ion on my own infrastructure?
Only under a custom enterprise agreement negotiated with Cesium.
GraphHopper: Does GraphHopper offer a trial period?
No. There is no trial period. You can start with the free plan to test, but commercial use requires a paid subscription.
SourceCesium ion: Do I need Cesium ion to use CesiumJS?
No. CesiumJS is open source and free. ion provides hosted tiling, base layers and streaming that you would otherwise have to build.
GraphHopper: How much does the Premium plan cost and what do I get?
Premium is 479 euros per month and includes 50,000 daily credits, up to 200 locations per request, up to 20 vehicles, email and phone support, and access to all APIs including routing and optimization.
SourceGraphHopper: Is there a discount if I link back to GraphHopper?
Yes. A 20% discount is available with proper attribution. The page also mentions a 99.5% uptime SLA on paid plans only.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphHopper
Other head to heads
- Cesium ion vs Mapbox
- Cesium ion vs CesiumJS
- Cesium ion vs MapTiler
- Cesium ion vs Fused
- Cesium ion vs Agisoft Metashape
- Cesium ion vs Correlator3D
- Cesium ion vs Global Mapper
- Cesium ion vs Kepler.gl
- Cesium ion vs Trailforks
- Cesium ion vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Cesium ion vs QGIS
- Cesium ion vs deck.gl
- Cesium ion vs OSRM
- Cesium ion vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- Cesium ion vs PositionStack
- Cesium ion vs Radar
- Cesium ion vs SAGA GIS
- Cesium ion vs Stadia Maps
- Cesium ion vs Google Maps Platform
- Cesium ion vs Apple Maps
- Cesium ion vs HERE Technologies
- Cesium ion vs Ride with GPS
- Cesium ion vs Geoapify
- Cesium ion vs LocationIQ
- Cesium ion vs OpenRouteService
- Cesium ion vs Bing Maps
- Cesium ion vs GRASS GIS
- Cesium ion vs onX Maps
- Cesium ion vs Potree
- Cesium ion vs SW Maps
- Cesium ion vs WhiteboxTools
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs CesiumJS
- GraphHopper vs MapTiler
- GraphHopper vs Fused
- GraphHopper vs Agisoft Metashape
- GraphHopper vs Correlator3D
- GraphHopper vs Global Mapper
- GraphHopper vs Kepler.gl
- GraphHopper vs Trailforks
- GraphHopper vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- GraphHopper vs QGIS
- GraphHopper vs deck.gl
- GraphHopper vs OSRM
- GraphHopper vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- GraphHopper vs PositionStack
- GraphHopper vs Radar
- GraphHopper vs SAGA GIS
- GraphHopper vs Stadia Maps
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs Ride with GPS
- GraphHopper vs Geoapify
- GraphHopper vs LocationIQ
- GraphHopper vs OpenRouteService
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs GRASS GIS
- GraphHopper vs onX Maps
- GraphHopper vs Potree
- GraphHopper vs SW Maps
- GraphHopper vs WhiteboxTools
