Productivity · head to head
Supernormal vs Tana

Supernormal
Productivity
AI meeting notes captured from the desktop app without sending a bot into the call
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Supernormal credit consumption varies by task complexity and no rate card is published, so a team cannot forecast whether fifty credits covers a month of work until it has spent one, which makes the paid tiers hard to size.; Tana the free plan hosts only 5 meetings a month with AI transcripts and summaries
- They diverge on capability: Supernormal covers Bot-free desktop capture, Tana covers Outliner interface.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Supernormal and Tana actually diverge.
| Attribute | Supernormal | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per month by credits | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, macOS, Windows, Chrome | Web, Desktop |
| Founded | Unknown | 2020 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Productivity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Supernormal
- Bot-free desktop capture
- Structured notes
- Custom templates
- Generated work output
- Credit rollover
- Admin governance
- Sharing and search
- Multi-platform capture
Only in Tana
- Outliner interface
- Supertags
- Live queries
- AI integration
- Graph views
- Email capture
- API
- Zapier
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Supernormal
- Client-facing consultants whose customers refuse to admit a recording bot but who still need an accurate record of what was agreednot Tana
- A recruiter running back-to-back interviews who wants structured notes per candidate without an extra participant appearing to the candidatenot Tana
- A small team that wants meeting output turned directly into a document or deck rather than into a transcript someone must rewritenot Tana
- A regulated organisation needing SSO, audit logs and retention controls over meeting records without deploying an enterprise suitenot Tana
Tana
- Structured note taking with a graph based supertag data modelnot Supernormal
- Automatic meeting capture with AI transcripts and summariesnot Supernormal
- Turning notes into queryable structured databasesnot Supernormal
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Supernormal
- Credit consumption varies by task complexity and no rate card is published, so a team cannot forecast whether fifty credits covers a month of work until it has spent one, which makes the paid tiers hard to size.
- Team and Business include the same fifty credits, so the higher tier buys governance rather than capacity, and a heavy user hitting the ceiling gains nothing by upgrading.
- Capturing without a visible bot removes the prompt that reminds participants they are being recorded, but not the legal consent obligation in two-party consent jurisdictions, and the product makes that omission easy.
- Desktop capture depends on the application running on the meeting host's machine, so a participant joining from a phone, a locked-down corporate laptop or a browser without the extension gets nothing.
- The category is crowded with better-funded competitors bundled into Zoom, Microsoft and Google subscriptions customers already pay for, which puts sustained pressure on a small independent vendor and on the value of standardising a team on it.
Tana
- The free plan hosts only 5 meetings a month with AI transcripts and summaries
- The free plan connects only 1 calendar and allows 50 AI queries
- Pro is $30 per user per month at standard price, with $20 shown as an early bird rate
- Max is $120 per user per month at standard price, with $80 shown as an early bird rate
- Integrations and full MCP require the Pro plan
- Dedicated support and onboarding, and unlimited agents, skills and types, require the Max plan
- The Business plan is custom priced, billed yearly and has no published rate
- The free trial runs 30 days
Pricing, plan by plan
Supernormal
Free- FreeFree
- 15 credits a month
- Maximum 5 credits a day
- Desktop meeting capture without bots
- Team$20/month
- 50 credits a month
- No daily credit cap
- Credit rollover
- Business$40/month
- 50 credits a month, the same allowance as Team
- SSO
- Audit logs
Tana
Free- FreeFree
- 5 hosted meetings monthly with AI transcripts
- 1 calendar connection
- 50 AI queries
- Pro$20/month
- Early bird pricing (regular $30/month)
- Unlimited hosted meetings
- Botless meeting agent for Zoom, Teams, Google Meet
- Max$80/month
- Early bird pricing (regular $120/month)
- 5x more AI than Pro plan
- Dedicated support and onboarding
- Business$null/year
- Custom pricing (billed yearly)
- SAML SSO and advanced security controls
- Designated customer success manager
Which should you pick?
Choose Supernormal if
- You need bot-free desktop capture.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows, Chrome.
- You also want structured notes.
Choose Tana if
- You need outliner interface.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Desktop.
- You also want supertags.
Questions people ask
- Is Supernormal or Tana better?
- Neither clearly leads. Supernormal starts at Free and Tana at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Supernormal or Tana?
- Supernormal starts at Free and Tana at Free.
- Does Supernormal or Tana run on more platforms?
- Supernormal runs on Web, macOS, Windows, Chrome. Tana runs on Web, Desktop.
- Can I use Supernormal for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Supernormal best used for?
- Supernormal is most often used for client-facing consultants whose customers refuse to admit a recording bot but who still need an accurate record of what was agreed, a recruiter running back-to-back interviews who wants structured notes per candidate without an extra participant appearing to the candidate, a small team that wants meeting output turned directly into a document or deck rather than into a transcript someone must rewrite, a regulated organisation needing sso, audit logs and retention controls over meeting records without deploying an enterprise suite. Of those, client-facing consultants whose customers refuse to admit a recording bot but who still need an accurate record of what was agreed and a recruiter running back-to-back interviews who wants structured notes per candidate without an extra participant appearing to the candidate are not what Tana is typically brought in for.
- What can Supernormal do that Tana cannot?
- Supernormal covers Bot-free desktop capture, Structured notes, Custom templates, Generated work output. Tana covers Outliner interface, Supertags, Live queries, AI integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Supernormal: Does Supernormal join my meeting as a bot?
No. It captures from the desktop application, so no additional participant appears in the call. That is its main differentiator.
Tana: What is Tana's cheapest paid plan?
Tana Pro starts at $20/month with early bird pricing (regular $30/month) per user, offering unlimited hosted meetings and AI transcripts.
SourceSupernormal: How much does it cost?
Free gives 15 credits a month capped at 5 a day. Team is $20 a month and Business is $40 a month, both with 50 credits.
Tana: Does Tana offer a free trial?
Yes, Tana provides a 30-day free trial with no credit card required, plus a 60-day refund window for yearly plan subscribers.
SourceSupernormal: What does a credit buy?
Credits are consumed by tasks and usage varies with complexity. The vendor does not publish per-task rates, which is the weak point of the pricing model.
Tana: What is the difference between Tana Pro and Max plans?
Max provides 5x more AI than Pro ($80/month early bird or $120 regular), dedicated support, onboarding, and unlimited agents and skills.
SourceSupernormal: Do I still need consent to record?
Yes. Removing the visible bot does not remove the legal requirement in jurisdictions that require all parties to consent. Treat the absence of a prompt as a compliance risk, not a feature.
Related pages
More on Supernormal
Other head to heads
- Supernormal vs Bluedot
- Supernormal vs MeetGeek
- Supernormal vs Streaks
- Supernormal vs Mimestream
- Supernormal vs Spark Mail
- Supernormal vs Capacities
- Supernormal vs Alfred
- Supernormal vs HEY
- Supernormal vs Remember The Milk
- Supernormal vs Bear Notes
- Supernormal vs Todoist
- Supernormal vs Things 3
- Supernormal vs Nitro PDF
- Supernormal vs Beautiful.ai
- Supernormal vs MindMeister
- Supernormal vs PDF Expert
- Supernormal vs TickTick
- Supernormal vs Google Slides
- Supernormal vs Reflect
- Supernormal vs OmniFocus 3
- Supernormal vs Brain.fm
- Supernormal vs Google Workspace
- Supernormal vs Hubstaff
- Supernormal vs FigJam
- Supernormal vs Coggle
- Supernormal vs Milanote
- Supernormal vs iLovePDF
- Supernormal vs Pitch
- Supernormal vs AnyList
- Supernormal vs Bluemail
- Supernormal vs Bring!
- Tana vs Bluedot
- Tana vs MeetGeek
- Tana vs Streaks
- Tana vs Mimestream
- Tana vs Spark Mail
- Tana vs Capacities
- Tana vs Alfred
- Tana vs HEY
- Tana vs Remember The Milk
- Tana vs Bear Notes
- Tana vs Todoist
- Tana vs Things 3
- Tana vs Nitro PDF
- Tana vs Beautiful.ai
- Tana vs MindMeister
- Tana vs PDF Expert
- Tana vs TickTick
- Tana vs Google Slides
- Tana vs Reflect
- Tana vs OmniFocus 3
- Tana vs Brain.fm
- Tana vs Google Workspace
- Tana vs Hubstaff
- Tana vs FigJam
- Tana vs Coggle
- Tana vs Milanote
- Tana vs iLovePDF
- Tana vs Pitch
- Tana vs AnyList
- Tana vs Bluemail
- Tana vs Bring!

