CRM · head to head
Scratchpad vs Woodpecker

Scratchpad
CRM
Faster workspace over Salesforce for sales reps to update pipeline, take notes and manage deals
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Woodpecker
CRM
Cold email and LinkedIn outreach automation platform with pay-per-use pricing
- From
- $7/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Scratchpad has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Scratchpad scratchpad works with Salesforce and nothing else, with no HubSpot support, so it is off the shortlist entirely for any company on a different CRM regardless of how good the interface is.; Woodpecker linkedIn outreach, extra warm-ups and API access are all separate paid add-ons rather than bundled features.
- They diverge on capability: Scratchpad covers Spreadsheet pipeline views, Woodpecker covers Cold email sequencing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Scratchpad and Woodpecker actually diverge.
| Attribute | Scratchpad | Woodpecker |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $7/month |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | usage-based |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Chrome extension | web, api |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (CRM).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Scratchpad
- Spreadsheet pipeline views
- Call recorder and notetaker
- AI field updates
- Deal and account agent
- Hygiene monitor
- Notes linked to records
- Custom prompts
- Kanban and forecast views
Only in Woodpecker
- Cold email sequencing
- Email verification
- Deliverability warm-up
- Lead Finder
- Agency panel
- API and integrations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Scratchpad
- A 60-rep Salesforce team whose forecast is unreliable because opportunity fields are updated once a week in a panic before the pipeline callnot Woodpecker
- A rep who wants to update twenty opportunities in a grid rather than opening twenty Salesforce recordsnot Woodpecker
- A sales manager wanting stale and incomplete pipeline records flagged automatically instead of chased by emailnot Woodpecker
- A revenue operations lead trialling AI notetaking that writes back to CRM fields before committing budget, using the free tiernot Woodpecker
Woodpecker
- Running personalized one-to-one cold email campaignsnot Scratchpad
- Agencies managing outreach across multiple client accountsnot Scratchpad
- Verifying catch-all email addresses before sendingnot Scratchpad
- Adding LinkedIn outreach on top of an existing email campaignnot Scratchpad
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Scratchpad
- Scratchpad works with Salesforce and nothing else, with no HubSpot support, so it is off the shortlist entirely for any company on a different CRM regardless of how good the interface is.
- AI credits are metered per user per month at 400 on Solo and 800 on Team, which means heavy notetaking use pushes teams towards Enterprise for capacity rather than for features.
- There is no proper native mobile application, so representatives who wanted to update records from a car park between meetings are back in a mobile browser.
- Sync with Salesforce and call processing can lag, and a pipeline view showing yesterday state during a forecast call undermines the exact meeting the tool was bought to improve.
- It creates a second notes surface alongside native Salesforce notes, so organisations end up with deal history split across two places unless they explicitly ban one of them.
Woodpecker
- LinkedIn outreach, extra warm-ups and API access are all separate paid add-ons rather than bundled features.
- Pay-per-contacted-prospect pricing can be harder to predict than flat per-seat plans at high volume.
- Exceeding the contacted-prospect limit halts new sends until the plan is topped up.
- Lacks the built-in calling/SMS channels that some multichannel competitors offer.
Pricing, plan by plan
Scratchpad
Free- FreeFree
- Workspace limited to 3 views
- 10 hours a month of call recording and notetaking
- AI field updates
- Solo$19/month
- Unlimited views with sheets and notes
- Call recorder and notetaker
- AI field updates
- Team$49/month
- Everything in Solo
- 800 AI credits per user per month
- Gong integration
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited AI credits
- White-glove agent services included
- Enterprise security and administration
Woodpecker
$7/month- Pay-per-use$7/month
- $7 per 100 contacted prospects
- Unlimited team members and email accounts
- 4 warm-ups monthly
Which should you pick?
Choose Scratchpad if
- You need spreadsheet pipeline views.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Chrome extension.
- You also want call recorder and notetaker.
Choose Woodpecker if
- You need cold email sequencing.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want email verification.
Questions people ask
- Is Scratchpad or Woodpecker better?
- Neither clearly leads. Scratchpad starts at Free and Woodpecker at $7/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Scratchpad or Woodpecker?
- Scratchpad has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Scratchpad and $7/month for Woodpecker.
- Does Scratchpad or Woodpecker run on more platforms?
- Scratchpad runs on Web, Chrome extension. Woodpecker runs on web, api.
- Can I use Scratchpad for free?
- Yes. Scratchpad has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Woodpecker starts at $7/month.
- What is Scratchpad best used for?
- Scratchpad is most often used for a 60-rep salesforce team whose forecast is unreliable because opportunity fields are updated once a week in a panic before the pipeline call, a rep who wants to update twenty opportunities in a grid rather than opening twenty salesforce records, a sales manager wanting stale and incomplete pipeline records flagged automatically instead of chased by email, a revenue operations lead trialling ai notetaking that writes back to crm fields before committing budget, using the free tier. Of those, a 60-rep salesforce team whose forecast is unreliable because opportunity fields are updated once a week in a panic before the pipeline call and a rep who wants to update twenty opportunities in a grid rather than opening twenty salesforce records are not what Woodpecker is typically brought in for.
- What can Scratchpad do that Woodpecker cannot?
- Scratchpad covers Spreadsheet pipeline views, Call recorder and notetaker, AI field updates, Deal and account agent. Woodpecker covers Cold email sequencing, Email verification, Deliverability warm-up, Lead Finder.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Scratchpad: Does Scratchpad work with HubSpot?
No. It is Salesforce-only.
Woodpecker: What does Woodpecker cost?
Woodpecker charges $7 per 100 contacted prospects per month (discounted heavily on annual billing), with add-ons like LinkedIn outreach at $29/month per account and extra warm-ups at $5/month each.
SourceScratchpad: Is the free plan usable in production?
Yes for an individual: full workspace with three views, 10 hours of recording and 100 AI credits a month. Teams outgrow it on views and credits.
Woodpecker: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Woodpecker offers a 14-day free trial with full features, capped at 14 days or 100 emails sent, whichever comes first; the trial can be extended by contacting support.
SourceScratchpad: Does it replace Salesforce licences?
No. Every user still needs their own Salesforce licence; Scratchpad is an interface on top.
Woodpecker: How is usage metered?
Usage is metered by the number of prospects contacted per month; exceeding the plan's contacted-prospect limit halts new email sends, and exceeding the stored prospect limit prevents adding new leads.
SourceScratchpad: What are AI credits spent on?
Notetaking, summarisation, field update suggestions and agent queries. Enterprise removes the cap.
Woodpecker: What does Woodpecker integrate with?
Woodpecker integrates with Pipedrive, HubSpot, Zoho, Calendly, Zapier, Google Sheets, and offers an API, CLI, webhooks and an MCP server for custom workflows.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Scratchpad vs Clari
- Scratchpad vs Gong
- Scratchpad vs Salesforce
- Scratchpad vs HubSpot
- Scratchpad vs Streak
- Scratchpad vs Folk
- Scratchpad vs Pipedrive
- Scratchpad vs Seismic
- Scratchpad vs Freshsales
- Scratchpad vs Agile CRM
- Scratchpad vs Capsule
- Scratchpad vs Capsule CRM
- Scratchpad vs SharpSpring
- Scratchpad vs Solid Performers
- Scratchpad vs SuiteCRM
- Scratchpad vs Teamleader
- Scratchpad vs Twenty
- Scratchpad vs LeadSquared
- Scratchpad vs lemlist
- Scratchpad vs Reply.io
- Scratchpad vs Hunter
- Scratchpad vs Snov.io
- Scratchpad vs UpLead
- Scratchpad vs Apollo.io
- Scratchpad vs Seamless.AI
- Scratchpad vs Kylas
- Scratchpad vs OnePageCRM
- Scratchpad vs Outreach
- Scratchpad vs Apptivo
- Scratchpad vs EspoCRM
- Scratchpad vs Clay
- Scratchpad vs Clearbit
- Scratchpad vs Less Annoying CRM
- Scratchpad vs Lusha
- Woodpecker vs Clari
- Woodpecker vs Gong
- Woodpecker vs Salesforce
- Woodpecker vs HubSpot
- Woodpecker vs Streak
- Woodpecker vs Folk
- Woodpecker vs Pipedrive
- Woodpecker vs Seismic
- Woodpecker vs Freshsales
- Woodpecker vs Agile CRM
- Woodpecker vs Capsule
- Woodpecker vs Capsule CRM
- Woodpecker vs SharpSpring
- Woodpecker vs Solid Performers
- Woodpecker vs SuiteCRM
- Woodpecker vs Teamleader
- Woodpecker vs Twenty
- Woodpecker vs LeadSquared
- Woodpecker vs lemlist
- Woodpecker vs Reply.io
- Woodpecker vs Hunter
- Woodpecker vs Snov.io
- Woodpecker vs UpLead
- Woodpecker vs Apollo.io
- Woodpecker vs Seamless.AI
- Woodpecker vs Kylas
- Woodpecker vs OnePageCRM
- Woodpecker vs Outreach
- Woodpecker vs Apptivo
- Woodpecker vs EspoCRM
- Woodpecker vs Clay
- Woodpecker vs Clearbit
- Woodpecker vs Less Annoying CRM
- Woodpecker vs Lusha
