Surveys · head to head
SurveyCTO vs Umami

SurveyCTO
Surveys
Offline field survey platform priced by submissions rather than seats, built for research data quality
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Umami
Marketing
Open source, cookie-free web analytics you can self-host for the cost of a database
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: SurveyCTO pricing is by submission volume, forms and storage rather than by users, so a small team running continuous high-volume collection can pay more than a 200-person survey team that runs for six weeks; Umami there is no cohort analysis, retention curve, session replay or multi-touch attribution, so a marketing team that needs to justify channel spend will still buy a second tool and Umami becomes a supplementary dashboard.
- They diverge on capability: SurveyCTO covers Offline collection, Umami covers Cookie-free tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which SurveyCTO and Umami actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in SurveyCTO
- Offline collection
- XLSForm authoring
- Automated quality checks
- Audio auditing
- Case management
- Random assignment
- Server region selection
Only in Umami
- Cookie-free tracking
- Self-hosting
- Small tracking script
- Custom events
- Funnels and goals
- Multi-site and teams
- Public dashboards
- API access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
SurveyCTO
- A household survey with 200 enumerators across a country where paying per seat would cost more than the fieldworknot Umami
- An impact evaluation that needs audio auditing and timing metadata to prove interviews were conducted as reportednot Umami
- A panel study revisiting the same households annually and needing offline case assignment to find them againnot Umami
- A statistics unit that must keep data inside a specific region and produce a SOC 2 report for its fundernot Umami
Umami
- A developer who wants traffic numbers on a personal or client site without adding a consent bannernot SurveyCTO
- An organisation whose legal or procurement team has ruled out sending visitor data to a US advertising companynot SurveyCTO
- A high-traffic site where hosted analytics priced by pageview band has become expensive and self-hosting removes the ceiling entirelynot SurveyCTO
- A team that wants analytics data in a database they already control so they can query and join it themselvesnot SurveyCTO
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
SurveyCTO
- Pricing is by submission volume, forms and storage rather than by users, so a small team running continuous high-volume collection can pay more than a 200-person survey team that runs for six weeks
- Forms are authored in XLSForm spreadsheet syntax, which is precise and versionable but has a real learning curve, and organisations without someone comfortable in it stall at form design
- Overage is charged at 100 US dollars per 1,000 extra submissions, which is easy to trigger on the Basic tier at 5,000 a month and produces surprise invoices during an active field round
- Server region selection only appears on the Pro tier and a custom GDPR data processing agreement only on Advanced, so European data protection requirements push the price to at least 315 and often 630 dollars a month regardless of volume
- It is built for structured research fieldwork, not for business process forms, so it has no dispatch, no invoicing and no formatted document output, and a field service business would be buying the wrong tool
Umami
- There is no cohort analysis, retention curve, session replay or multi-touch attribution, so a marketing team that needs to justify channel spend will still buy a second tool and Umami becomes a supplementary dashboard.
- Self-hosting is only free in licence terms; you own the database, the upgrades, the backups and the query performance at scale, and a busy site's events table grows quickly enough to need real attention.
- Because it stores no persistent identifier, it cannot follow a user across devices or sessions in any meaningful way, which makes returning-visitor and lifetime-value questions unanswerable by design rather than by omission.
- Cloud overage is billed per event beyond the plan allowance, so a traffic spike or a badly instrumented custom event can produce a bill materially above the $20 or $200 headline before anyone notices.
- It is maintained by a small team, so the pace of new capability is modest and enterprise expectations such as SSO, granular role permissions and formal support agreements are limited compared with commercial analytics vendors.
Pricing, plan by plan
SurveyCTO
Free- CommunityFree
- Permanent free subscription for testing and training
- 10 forms
- 200 monthly submissions
- Basic$225/month
- Billed annually, 250 USD month to month
- 100 forms
- 10 GB storage
- Pro$315/month
- Billed annually, 350 USD month to month
- 500 forms
- 25 GB storage
- Advanced$630/month
- Billed annually, 700 USD month to month
- Unlimited forms, storage and submissions
- Advanced offline case management
Umami
Free- Self-hostedFree
- MIT licensed, no licence fee
- No event limit imposed by the software
- Unlimited websites and users
- Cloud HobbyFree
- Up to 100,000 events per month
- 3 websites
- 6 months data retention
- Cloud Pro$20/month
- Up to 1,000,000 events per month
- Unlimited websites
- Unlimited team members
- Cloud Business$200/month
- Up to 10,000,000 events per month
- All Pro features
- Higher volume overage rate
Which should you pick?
Choose SurveyCTO if
- You need offline collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Android, iOS.
- You also want xlsform authoring.
Choose Umami if
- You need cookie-free tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want self-hosting.
Questions people ask
- Is SurveyCTO or Umami better?
- Neither clearly leads. SurveyCTO starts at Free and Umami at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, SurveyCTO or Umami?
- SurveyCTO starts at Free and Umami at Free.
- Does SurveyCTO or Umami run on more platforms?
- SurveyCTO runs on Web, Android, iOS. Umami runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use SurveyCTO for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is SurveyCTO best used for?
- SurveyCTO is most often used for a household survey with 200 enumerators across a country where paying per seat would cost more than the fieldwork, an impact evaluation that needs audio auditing and timing metadata to prove interviews were conducted as reported, a panel study revisiting the same households annually and needing offline case assignment to find them again, a statistics unit that must keep data inside a specific region and produce a soc 2 report for its funder. Of those, a household survey with 200 enumerators across a country where paying per seat would cost more than the fieldwork and an impact evaluation that needs audio auditing and timing metadata to prove interviews were conducted as reported are not what Umami is typically brought in for.
- What can SurveyCTO do that Umami cannot?
- SurveyCTO covers Offline collection, XLSForm authoring, Automated quality checks, Audio auditing. Umami covers Cookie-free tracking, Self-hosting, Small tracking script, Custom events.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
SurveyCTO: Do I pay per enumerator?
No. Users and devices are unlimited on every paid tier. You pay for monthly submissions, forms and storage.
Umami: Is Umami really free?
Self-hosted, yes; it is MIT licensed with no event cap. You pay for the server and database. Umami Cloud has a free tier at 100,000 events a month and paid tiers from $20.
SurveyCTO: Is there a free version?
Yes, a permanent community subscription with 10 forms, 200 monthly submissions and 200 MB of storage, intended for testing and training rather than production.
Umami: Do I need a cookie consent banner?
For Umami analytics specifically, generally no, because it sets no cookies and stores no personal data. Other tags on your site may still require one.
SurveyCTO: What happens if I exceed my submissions?
Extra credits are 100 US dollars per 1,000, with discounts of 20 per cent or more at volume. Plan the tier around your peak field month, not your average.
Umami: Can it replace Google Analytics?
For traffic, referrers and event counts, yes. For attribution modelling, audiences and advertising integration, no.
SurveyCTO: Can I choose where the data is stored?
Only on Pro and above. If data residency matters, budget for at least the Pro tier.
Umami: What does it need to run?
A container and a PostgreSQL or MySQL database. Most people deploy it on infrastructure they already pay for.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- SurveyCTO vs Jotform
- SurveyCTO vs KoboToolbox
- SurveyCTO vs Tally
- SurveyCTO vs Zonka Feedback
- SurveyCTO vs Device Magic
- SurveyCTO vs Qualtrics CoreXM
- SurveyCTO vs Fillout
- SurveyCTO vs Sogolytics
- SurveyCTO vs Medallia
- SurveyCTO vs QuestionPro
- SurveyCTO vs Retool
- SurveyCTO vs Cognito Forms
- SurveyCTO vs Google Forms
- SurveyCTO vs Microsoft Forms
- SurveyCTO vs SurveyLegend
- SurveyCTO vs Wufoo
- SurveyCTO vs Matomo
- SurveyCTO vs Plausible
- SurveyCTO vs Fathom Analytics
- SurveyCTO vs Mautic
- SurveyCTO vs Countly
- SurveyCTO vs Freshpaint
- SurveyCTO vs Simple Analytics
- SurveyCTO vs Attribution
- SurveyCTO vs CallRail
- SurveyCTO vs Microsoft Clarity
- SurveyCTO vs Octoboard
- SurveyCTO vs Onclusive
- SurveyCTO vs WebEngage
- SurveyCTO vs Woopra
- SurveyCTO vs Wunderkind
- SurveyCTO vs Typeform
- SurveyCTO vs MoEngage
- SurveyCTO vs Optimizely
- Umami vs Jotform
- Umami vs KoboToolbox
- Umami vs Tally
- Umami vs Zonka Feedback
- Umami vs Device Magic
- Umami vs Qualtrics CoreXM
- Umami vs Fillout
- Umami vs Sogolytics
- Umami vs Medallia
- Umami vs QuestionPro
- Umami vs Retool
- Umami vs Cognito Forms
- Umami vs Google Forms
- Umami vs Microsoft Forms
- Umami vs SurveyLegend
- Umami vs Wufoo
- Umami vs Matomo
- Umami vs Plausible
- Umami vs Fathom Analytics
- Umami vs Mautic
- Umami vs Countly
- Umami vs Freshpaint
- Umami vs Simple Analytics
- Umami vs Attribution
- Umami vs CallRail
- Umami vs Microsoft Clarity
- Umami vs Octoboard
- Umami vs Onclusive
- Umami vs WebEngage
- Umami vs Woopra
- Umami vs Wunderkind
- Umami vs Typeform
- Umami vs MoEngage
- Umami vs Optimizely
