Fleet Management · head to head
NexTraq vs Transit

NexTraq
Fleet Management
US small-fleet telematics now absorbed into Michelin Connected Fleet
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Transit
Maps
Public transit trip planning and real-time arrivals for buses, trains and shared bikes and scooters
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Transit has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: NexTraq the NexTraq brand has been absorbed into Michelin Connected Fleet, so the product name, the account team and eventually the platform underneath you are all subject to a consolidation plan you have no say in.; Transit coverage depends entirely on whether the local transit agency publishes a real-time feed, so quality swings sharply between well-funded metro systems and smaller regional operators.
- They diverge on capability: NexTraq covers Vehicle tracking, Transit covers Real-time arrivals.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NexTraq and Transit actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NexTraq
- Vehicle tracking
- Hours of service
- Fuel and idling reporting
- Maintenance scheduling
- Job dispatch
- Driver scorecards
Only in Transit
- Real-time arrivals
- Multi-modal trip planning
- Service alerts
- In-app fare payment
- Offline schedules
- GO transit and micromobility layers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NexTraq
- A North American trades or field service fleet that wants tracking, dispatch and ELD compliance from one mid-market vendornot Transit
- An operator already buying Michelin tyres and fleet services that can negotiate telematics into a wider commercial agreementnot Transit
- A fleet replacing an ageing tracking system that values an owner with a large corporate balance sheet over a venture-funded challengernot Transit
- A distribution business needing straightforward fuel and idling reporting to justify a driver behaviour programmenot Transit
Transit
- A commuter in a city with a well-maintained GTFS-realtime feed wanting live bus and train arrivalsnot NexTraq
- A rider comparing a transit trip against a bike share or scooter leg for the last milenot NexTraq
- A visitor needing offline-capable static schedules in a city with patchy data coveragenot NexTraq
- Someone wanting to buy a transit fare inside the same app used to plan the trip, in supported citiesnot NexTraq
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NexTraq
- The NexTraq brand has been absorbed into Michelin Connected Fleet, so the product name, the account team and eventually the platform underneath you are all subject to a consolidation plan you have no say in.
- Michelin is merging three separately engineered telematics products, which historically means feature freezes on the older platforms and a migration that existing customers pay for in disruption rather than cash.
- The feature set is mid-market and unexceptional, so it rarely wins a technical evaluation against Geotab or Samsara on capability alone.
- Contracts bundle hardware into multi-year terms, so a fleet that shrinks or is acquired continues paying for devices, and early exit triggers hardware recovery costs.
- The integration ecosystem is small and the API is not a selling point, so connecting telematics data to job costing or payroll usually means custom work or scheduled file exports.
Transit
- Coverage depends entirely on whether the local transit agency publishes a real-time feed, so quality swings sharply between well-funded metro systems and smaller regional operators.
- The company earns its revenue by selling agencies a paid analytics product built from rider trip data, which means the free app functions partly as a data-collection layer for a business customer, not only as a public service.
- In-app fare payment is only available in a limited set of cities, so the headline feature is not something most riders can actually use.
- Static schedule fallback in low-data cities is only as accurate as the agency last published, and service changes can go unreflected for weeks.
- The app has no offline routing without a cached area, so it is not reliable for navigation in areas with poor mobile signal.
Pricing, plan by plan
NexTraq
On request- NexTraq$undefined/year
- Per vehicle subscription with hardware bundled into the term
- Multi-year agreements are standard
- ELD and dispatch modules priced as tiers
Transit
Free- Rider appFree
- Real-time arrivals and trip planning
- No ads shown to riders
- In-app fare purchase where supported
Which should you pick?
Choose NexTraq if
- You need vehicle tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want hours of service.
Choose Transit if
- You need real-time arrivals.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want multi-modal trip planning.
Questions people ask
- Is NexTraq or Transit better?
- Neither clearly leads. NexTraq starts at On request and Transit at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NexTraq or Transit?
- Transit has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for NexTraq and Free for Transit.
- Does NexTraq or Transit run on more platforms?
- NexTraq runs on Web, iOS, Android. Transit runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- Can I use Transit for free?
- Yes. Transit has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. NexTraq starts at On request.
- What is NexTraq best used for?
- NexTraq is most often used for a north american trades or field service fleet that wants tracking, dispatch and eld compliance from one mid-market vendor, an operator already buying michelin tyres and fleet services that can negotiate telematics into a wider commercial agreement, a fleet replacing an ageing tracking system that values an owner with a large corporate balance sheet over a venture-funded challenger, a distribution business needing straightforward fuel and idling reporting to justify a driver behaviour programme. Of those, a north american trades or field service fleet that wants tracking, dispatch and eld compliance from one mid-market vendor and an operator already buying michelin tyres and fleet services that can negotiate telematics into a wider commercial agreement are not what Transit is typically brought in for.
- What can NexTraq do that Transit cannot?
- NexTraq covers Vehicle tracking, Hours of service, Fuel and idling reporting, Maintenance scheduling. Transit covers Real-time arrivals, Multi-modal trip planning, Service alerts, In-app fare payment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NexTraq: Is NexTraq still a separate company?
No. Michelin bought it in 2017 and has folded it into Michelin Connected Fleet, together with Masternaut in Europe and Sascar in Brazil.
Transit: Does Transit cost anything to use?
No. The rider app is free with no subscription and no ads; the company earns money separately by selling agencies a paid data and communication platform.
NexTraq: Will my NexTraq system be migrated to a different platform?
Assume so, eventually. Ask directly what the migration timetable is, what happens to historical data, and who bears the cost of re-fitting or re-configuring devices.
Transit: Does it work in every city?
No. Coverage depends on whether the local transit agency publishes a GTFS or GTFS-realtime feed; some smaller markets have static schedules only.
NexTraq: Does buying Michelin tyres get me a better telematics price?
It is worth testing. The commercial logic of the acquisition is bundling vehicle services, and that is where discounting is most likely to be available.
Transit: Can I buy a bus or train ticket in the app?
Only in cities where the local agency has integrated fare payment; elsewhere you still need the agency app or a physical ticket.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- NexTraq vs Geotab
- NexTraq vs Verizon Connect
- NexTraq vs Azuga
- NexTraq vs Samsara
- NexTraq vs Motive
- NexTraq vs GPS Trackit
- NexTraq vs Fleet Complete
- NexTraq vs Quartix
- NexTraq vs Zonar Systems
- NexTraq vs AssetWorks
- NexTraq vs Lytx
- NexTraq vs Ridecell
- NexTraq vs Uptake
- NexTraq vs Webfleet
- NexTraq vs Whip Around
- NexTraq vs Citymapper
- NexTraq vs Ride with GPS
- NexTraq vs Google Maps
- NexTraq vs HERE WeGo
- NexTraq vs ArcGIS Survey123
- NexTraq vs Felt
- NexTraq vs MapQuest
- NexTraq vs TomTom Developer Portal
- NexTraq vs Waze
- NexTraq vs Apple Maps
- NexTraq vs CARTO
- NexTraq vs Gaia GPS
- NexTraq vs GraphHopper
- NexTraq vs GRASS GIS
- NexTraq vs IndoorAtlas
- NexTraq vs Esri ArcGIS
- Transit vs Geotab
- Transit vs Verizon Connect
- Transit vs Azuga
- Transit vs Samsara
- Transit vs Motive
- Transit vs GPS Trackit
- Transit vs Fleet Complete
- Transit vs Quartix
- Transit vs Zonar Systems
- Transit vs AssetWorks
- Transit vs Lytx
- Transit vs Ridecell
- Transit vs Uptake
- Transit vs Webfleet
- Transit vs Whip Around
- Transit vs Citymapper
- Transit vs Ride with GPS
- Transit vs Google Maps
- Transit vs HERE WeGo
- Transit vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Transit vs Felt
- Transit vs MapQuest
- Transit vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Transit vs Waze
- Transit vs Apple Maps
- Transit vs CARTO
- Transit vs Gaia GPS
- Transit vs GraphHopper
- Transit vs GRASS GIS
- Transit vs IndoorAtlas
- Transit vs Esri ArcGIS
