Fleet Management · head to head
NexTraq vs Ride with GPS

NexTraq
Fleet Management
US small-fleet telematics now absorbed into Michelin Connected Fleet
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Ride with GPS
Maps
Cycling route planning and navigation with a genuinely usable free tier and two paid tiers above it
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Ride with GPS has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: NexTraq the NexTraq brand has been absorbed into Michelin Connected Fleet, so the product name, the account team and eventually the platform underneath you are all subject to a consolidation plan you have no say in.; Ride with GPS turn-by-turn navigation and offline maps are locked behind the paid tiers, so the free tier alone is not enough for navigation in an area without signal.
- They diverge on capability: NexTraq covers Vehicle tracking, Ride with GPS covers Route builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NexTraq and Ride with GPS actually diverge.
| Attribute | NexTraq | Ride with GPS |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Freemium, per user per month |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Category | Fleet Management | Maps |
Identical on both: platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NexTraq
- Vehicle tracking
- Hours of service
- Fuel and idling reporting
- Maintenance scheduling
- Job dispatch
- Driver scorecards
Only in Ride with GPS
- Route builder
- Global heatmap
- Turn-by-turn navigation
- Offline maps
- Garmin sync
- Extra map layers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NexTraq
- A North American trades or field service fleet that wants tracking, dispatch and ELD compliance from one mid-market vendornot Ride with GPS
- An operator already buying Michelin tyres and fleet services that can negotiate telematics into a wider commercial agreementnot Ride with GPS
- A fleet replacing an ageing tracking system that values an owner with a large corporate balance sheet over a venture-funded challengernot Ride with GPS
- A distribution business needing straightforward fuel and idling reporting to justify a driver behaviour programmenot Ride with GPS
Ride with GPS
- A cyclist planning a multi-day touring route who needs offline maps for areas without signalnot NexTraq
- Someone who wants turn-by-turn voice navigation on unfamiliar roads rather than checking a screennot NexTraq
- A rider who wants to see popular local routes via the heatmap before committing to a paid tiernot NexTraq
- A cyclist syncing custom routes directly to a Garmin computer for a big ridenot NexTraq
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NexTraq
- The NexTraq brand has been absorbed into Michelin Connected Fleet, so the product name, the account team and eventually the platform underneath you are all subject to a consolidation plan you have no say in.
- Michelin is merging three separately engineered telematics products, which historically means feature freezes on the older platforms and a migration that existing customers pay for in disruption rather than cash.
- The feature set is mid-market and unexceptional, so it rarely wins a technical evaluation against Geotab or Samsara on capability alone.
- Contracts bundle hardware into multi-year terms, so a fleet that shrinks or is acquired continues paying for devices, and early exit triggers hardware recovery costs.
- The integration ecosystem is small and the API is not a selling point, so connecting telematics data to job costing or payroll usually means custom work or scheduled file exports.
Ride with GPS
- Turn-by-turn navigation and offline maps are locked behind the paid tiers, so the free tier alone is not enough for navigation in an area without signal.
- There are two separate paid tiers rather than one, and some navigation-adjacent features are split between Basic and Premium in ways that are easy to misjudge before subscribing.
- It is general cycling focused, not mountain-bike trail specific, so a trail rider is better served by Trailforks for singletrack detail.
- The web-based route builder is more capable than the mobile app for planning, so serious route creation is awkward to do purely from a phone.
- Exact free-tier limits, such as any cap on saved routes, are not clearly published, so a heavy free-tier user may hit an undocumented limit unexpectedly.
Pricing, plan by plan
NexTraq
On request- NexTraq$undefined/year
- Per vehicle subscription with hardware bundled into the term
- Multi-year agreements are standard
- ELD and dispatch modules priced as tiers
Ride with GPS
Free- StarterFree
- Route creation
- Ride recording
- Global heatmap access
- Basic$7.99/month
- Turn-by-turn navigation
- Offline route maps
- ETA and advanced route planning
- Premium$9.99/month
- Everything in Basic
- Extra map layers: wind, air quality, cell coverage
Which should you pick?
Choose NexTraq if
- You need vehicle tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want hours of service.
Choose Ride with GPS if
- You need route builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want global heatmap.
Questions people ask
- Is NexTraq or Ride with GPS better?
- Neither clearly leads. NexTraq starts at On request and Ride with GPS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NexTraq or Ride with GPS?
- Ride with GPS has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for NexTraq and Free for Ride with GPS.
- Does NexTraq or Ride with GPS run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Ride with GPS for free?
- Yes. Ride with GPS has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. NexTraq starts at On request.
- What is NexTraq best used for?
- NexTraq is most often used for a north american trades or field service fleet that wants tracking, dispatch and eld compliance from one mid-market vendor, an operator already buying michelin tyres and fleet services that can negotiate telematics into a wider commercial agreement, a fleet replacing an ageing tracking system that values an owner with a large corporate balance sheet over a venture-funded challenger, a distribution business needing straightforward fuel and idling reporting to justify a driver behaviour programme. Of those, a north american trades or field service fleet that wants tracking, dispatch and eld compliance from one mid-market vendor and an operator already buying michelin tyres and fleet services that can negotiate telematics into a wider commercial agreement are not what Ride with GPS is typically brought in for.
- What can NexTraq do that Ride with GPS cannot?
- NexTraq covers Vehicle tracking, Hours of service, Fuel and idling reporting, Maintenance scheduling. Ride with GPS covers Route builder, Global heatmap, Turn-by-turn navigation, Offline maps.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NexTraq: Is NexTraq still a separate company?
No. Michelin bought it in 2017 and has folded it into Michelin Connected Fleet, together with Masternaut in Europe and Sascar in Brazil.
Ride with GPS: Is Ride with GPS free?
A free Starter tier exists with route creation and the heatmap, but turn-by-turn navigation and offline maps require the Basic or Premium paid tier.
NexTraq: Will my NexTraq system be migrated to a different platform?
Assume so, eventually. Ask directly what the migration timetable is, what happens to historical data, and who bears the cost of re-fitting or re-configuring devices.
Ride with GPS: What is the difference between Basic and Premium?
Premium includes everything in Basic plus extra map layers such as wind, air quality and cell coverage.
NexTraq: Does buying Michelin tyres get me a better telematics price?
It is worth testing. The commercial logic of the acquisition is bundling vehicle services, and that is where discounting is most likely to be available.
Ride with GPS: Is it mountain-bike specific?
No, it is general road, gravel and touring focused; Trailforks is the mountain-bike trail specific option.
Related pages
More on Ride with GPS
Other head to heads
- NexTraq vs Geotab
- NexTraq vs Verizon Connect
- NexTraq vs Azuga
- NexTraq vs Samsara
- NexTraq vs Motive
- NexTraq vs GPS Trackit
- NexTraq vs Fleet Complete
- NexTraq vs Quartix
- NexTraq vs Zonar Systems
- NexTraq vs AssetWorks
- NexTraq vs Lytx
- NexTraq vs Ridecell
- NexTraq vs Uptake
- NexTraq vs Webfleet
- NexTraq vs Whip Around
- NexTraq vs Trailforks
- NexTraq vs Google Maps
- NexTraq vs onX Maps
- NexTraq vs Transit
- NexTraq vs Citymapper
- NexTraq vs AllTrails
- NexTraq vs Felt
- NexTraq vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- NexTraq vs ArcGIS Survey123
- NexTraq vs GraphHopper
- NexTraq vs Navmii GPS
- NexTraq vs OSRM
- NexTraq vs MapTiler
- NexTraq vs Potree
- NexTraq vs SW Maps
- NexTraq vs WhiteboxTools
- NexTraq vs Agisoft Metashape
- Ride with GPS vs Geotab
- Ride with GPS vs Verizon Connect
- Ride with GPS vs Azuga
- Ride with GPS vs Samsara
- Ride with GPS vs Motive
- Ride with GPS vs GPS Trackit
- Ride with GPS vs Fleet Complete
- Ride with GPS vs Quartix
- Ride with GPS vs Zonar Systems
- Ride with GPS vs AssetWorks
- Ride with GPS vs Lytx
- Ride with GPS vs Ridecell
- Ride with GPS vs Uptake
- Ride with GPS vs Webfleet
- Ride with GPS vs Whip Around
- Ride with GPS vs Trailforks
- Ride with GPS vs Google Maps
- Ride with GPS vs onX Maps
- Ride with GPS vs Transit
- Ride with GPS vs Citymapper
- Ride with GPS vs AllTrails
- Ride with GPS vs Felt
- Ride with GPS vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- Ride with GPS vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Ride with GPS vs GraphHopper
- Ride with GPS vs Navmii GPS
- Ride with GPS vs OSRM
- Ride with GPS vs MapTiler
- Ride with GPS vs Potree
- Ride with GPS vs SW Maps
- Ride with GPS vs WhiteboxTools
- Ride with GPS vs Agisoft Metashape
