Logging · head to head
Elastic vs Loki
The short version
- Only Loki has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Elastic no specific pricing amounts published on pricing page; customer must contact sales or start trial; Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Elastic and Loki actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Elastic
Nothing recorded that Loki does not also cover.
Only in Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Elastic
- Building ecommerce search experiences with vector databases and AInot Loki
- Monitoring application performance and resolving infrastructure issues at scalenot Loki
- Investigating security incidents across distributed cloud infrastructurenot Loki
- Analyzing customer support logs to identify recurring issuesnot Loki
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Elastic
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Elastic
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Elastic
- No specific pricing amounts published on pricing page; customer must contact sales or start trial
- Three deployment models (Cloud Hosted, Cloud Serverless, Self-managed) have different pricing structures
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Pricing, plan by plan
Elastic
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Elastic review.
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Which should you pick?
Choose Elastic if
Nothing in the data separates Elastic from Loki on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want label-based indexing.
Questions people ask
- Is Elastic or Loki better?
- Neither clearly leads. Elastic starts at On request and Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Elastic or Loki?
- Loki has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Elastic and Free for Loki.
- Does Elastic or Loki run on more platforms?
- Elastic runs on Web. Loki runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Loki for free?
- Yes. Loki has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Elastic starts at On request.
- What is Elastic best used for?
- Elastic is most often used for building ecommerce search experiences with vector databases and ai, monitoring application performance and resolving infrastructure issues at scale, investigating security incidents across distributed cloud infrastructure, analyzing customer support logs to identify recurring issues. Of those, building ecommerce search experiences with vector databases and ai and monitoring application performance and resolving infrastructure issues at scale are not what Loki is typically brought in for.
- What can Elastic do that Loki cannot?
- Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Elastic: What are Elastic's deployment pricing options?
Elastic offers three deployment models: Elastic Cloud Hosted (resource-based, pay-as-you-go or prepaid monthly), Elastic Cloud Serverless (usage-based on search/indexing consumption, pay-as-you-go or prepaid), and Self-managed (license-based on nodes and RAM). Actual dollar amounts are not published and require contacting sales or starting a free trial.
SourceLoki: What does it cost to use Grafana Loki?
Loki is open source and free under the AGPLv3 license for self-hosted deployments. Grafana's managed Cloud Logs service includes a free tier up to 50GB of logs at no cost.
SourceElastic: Does Elastic Cloud Serverless have feature limitations?
Yes, Elastic Cloud Serverless deployments have 'Most solution and platform capabilities' with some upcoming features not yet available, including traffic filtering, cross-project search, and bring-your-own-key encryption.
SourceLoki: Are there paid options for Loki beyond the free tier?
Yes. Grafana Cloud Logs offers paid tiers for teams and enterprises, and Enterprise Logs provides self-managed options with expert support for organizations with data localization or privacy requirements.
SourceElastic: How can you get Elastic pricing?
Elastic directs customers to start a free trial, contact sales for specific quotes, or visit dedicated pricing pages for individual products (Elasticsearch, Observability, Security).
SourceLoki: What license does open source Loki use?
Loki is released under the AGPLv3 license, which requires you to share modifications and publish your source code if you deploy modifications publicly.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Elastic vs New Relic
- Elastic vs Datadog Logs
- Elastic vs Coralogix
- Elastic vs Elasticsearch Service
- Elastic vs Logz.io
- Elastic vs Papertrail
- Elastic vs FireHydrant
- Elastic vs Rootly
- Elastic vs Checkly
- Elastic vs Axiom
- Elastic vs Loggly
- Elastic vs Mezmo
- Elastic vs New Relic Logs
- Elastic vs ELK Stack
- Elastic vs Kibana
- Elastic vs Logstash
- Elastic vs Elastic Stack
- Elastic vs Dynatrace Logs
- Elastic vs Graylog
- Elastic vs Retrace
- Elastic vs Raygun
- Elastic vs Elastic APM
- Elastic vs Filebeat
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs Elasticsearch Service
- Loki vs Logz.io
- Loki vs Papertrail
- Loki vs FireHydrant
- Loki vs Rootly
- Loki vs Checkly
- Loki vs Axiom
- Loki vs Loggly
- Loki vs Mezmo
- Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Loki vs ELK Stack
- Loki vs Kibana
- Loki vs Logstash
- Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Graylog
- Loki vs Retrace
- Loki vs Raygun
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs Filebeat


