Healthcare · head to head
Kareo vs OpenClinica

OpenClinica
Healthcare
Clinical trial EDC with a genuinely open source community edition alongside a quoted commercial platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kareo kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product; OpenClinica the free community edition is a different and older product line from the commercial platform, so evaluating the open source build tells you little about what the paid product actually does.
- They diverge on capability: Kareo covers Electronic Health Records, OpenClinica covers Open source community edition.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kareo and OpenClinica actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kareo | OpenClinica |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $99/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Mobile | Web, Self-hosted, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 2010 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kareo
- Electronic Health Records
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Medical Billing
- Payment Processing
- Labs
- Pharmacies
- Clearinghouses
Only in OpenClinica
- Open source community edition
- Electronic data capture
- eConsent
- eCOA and ePRO
- Randomisation
- EHR-to-EDC
- Audit trail
- Reporting and analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kareo
- Practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practicesnot OpenClinica
- Electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinicsnot OpenClinica
- Insurance claim submission and patient payment collectionnot OpenClinica
OpenClinica
- An academic coordinating centre running investigator-initiated trials that needs Part 11 compliant capture without an enterprise eClinical budgetnot Kareo
- A registry or observational cohort study collecting structured data across many sites over yearsnot Kareo
- A small device sponsor that needs eConsent and ePRO in the same system as its case report formsnot Kareo
- An informatics group that wants to self-host the open source edition for a non-regulated internal studynot Kareo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kareo
- Kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product
- Tebra publishes no rate: pricing varies with provider count, features and implementation requirements and is quoted during a demo
- Billing counts clinical providers such as MDs, DOs, NPs and PAs, so adding a prescriber raises the bill even though non clinical staff are free
- Electronic prescribing of controlled substances setup costs about $75 per provider as a one time fee
- PDMP integration costs $500 one time per facility plus about $50 per user per year
OpenClinica
- The free community edition is a different and older product line from the commercial platform, so evaluating the open source build tells you little about what the paid product actually does.
- The vendor provides no support or services at all for the community edition, which means outages, patching, database upgrades and validation documentation are entirely your problem.
- Commercial pricing is not published, so you cannot benchmark it against alternatives without entering a sales process, and third-party figures around USD 1,000 a month are indicative rather than contractual.
- Study build is skilled work: complex edit checks, randomisation schemes and integrations usually mean paying for vendor or consultant configuration services on top of the licence, which is a frequently underestimated line in the budget.
- As a smaller vendor than the large eClinical suites it has a thinner partner and consultant ecosystem, so finding experienced build staff or a CRO already fluent in the platform is harder than with the market incumbents.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kareo
$99/month- Starter$99/month
- EHR
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Professional$199/month
- Everything in Starter
- Billing
- Reporting
OpenClinica
On request- Community Edition$undefined/year
- Free and open source under the LGPL
- Self-hosted, on the older 3.x line
- No vendor support or services of any kind
- OpenClinica Enterprise$undefined/year
- Pricing only through a sales process
- Hosted and validated instance
- EDC, eConsent, eCOA, randomisation and analytics modules
Which should you pick?
Choose Kareo if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want scheduling.
Choose OpenClinica if
- You need open source community edition.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, iOS, Android.
- You also want electronic data capture.
Questions people ask
- Is Kareo or OpenClinica better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kareo starts at $99/month and OpenClinica at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kareo or OpenClinica?
- Kareo starts at $99/month and OpenClinica at On request.
- Does Kareo or OpenClinica run on more platforms?
- Kareo runs on Web, Mobile. OpenClinica runs on Web, Self-hosted, iOS, Android.
- What is Kareo best used for?
- Kareo is most often used for practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practices, electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinics, insurance claim submission and patient payment collection. Of those, practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practices and electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinics are not what OpenClinica is typically brought in for.
- What can Kareo do that OpenClinica cannot?
- Kareo covers Electronic Health Records, Scheduling, Patient Portal, Medical Billing. OpenClinica covers Open source community edition, Electronic data capture, eConsent, eCOA and ePRO.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kareo: Does Kareo publish its pricing?
No. Kareo (now rebranded as Tebra) uses custom per-practice pricing that varies based on the number of providers, features needed, and implementation requirements. Pricing is determined during a demo with the sales team.
SourceOpenClinica: Is OpenClinica free?
There is a genuinely free, LGPL licensed community edition you host yourself with no vendor support. The commercial platform with eConsent, eCOA and a validated hosted instance is quoted and paid.
Kareo: Are there discounts for adding multiple modules?
Yes. Tebra states that many practices qualify for bundled pricing or volume incentives when adopting multiple modules like EHR, billing, and patient experience tools together.
SourceOpenClinica: Is the open source version still maintained?
Yes, releases on the 3.x line continued through 2025, but it is a separate and older architecture from the commercial product.
Kareo: What are the additional costs for controlled substance prescribing?
For providers who prescribe controlled substances, EPCS setup costs approximately $75 per provider as a one-time fee, and PDMP integration costs $500 one-time per facility plus around $50 per user per year.
SourceOpenClinica: Does it meet 21 CFR Part 11?
The commercial hosted platform is built for Part 11 and GCP compliance. If you self-host the community edition, compliance and validation are entirely your responsibility.
Kareo: Does Kareo offer a free trial?
Kareo's website does not mention a free trial option. Access to pricing and trial arrangements requires contacting the sales team to request a demo.
SourceOpenClinica: What does the commercial version cost?
Not published. Third-party listings suggest enterprise arrangements from around USD 1,000 per month, but real cost depends on study count, subjects, modules and build services.
Related pages
More on OpenClinica
Other head to heads
- Kareo vs DrChrono
- Kareo vs Athenahealth
- Kareo vs Epic Systems
- Kareo vs Cerner
- Kareo vs Amwell
- Kareo vs Practice Fusion
- Kareo vs NextGen Healthcare
- Kareo vs WebPT
- Kareo vs TherapyNotes
- Kareo vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Kareo vs ChiroTouch
- Kareo vs Liberty Software
- Kareo vs Lunit
- Kareo vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Kareo vs PioneerRx
- Kareo vs Rad AI
- Kareo vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Kareo vs GNU Health
- Kareo vs Signant Health
- Kareo vs Oracle Clinical One
- Kareo vs OpenMRS
- Kareo vs DHIS2
- Kareo vs Bahmni
- Kareo vs Open Dental
- Kareo vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Kareo vs Ambra Health
- Kareo vs SilverCloud by Amwell
- Kareo vs Epic MyChart
- Kareo vs Flo
- Kareo vs Gleamer
- Kareo vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Kareo vs Included Health
- Kareo vs Rx30
- OpenClinica vs DrChrono
- OpenClinica vs Athenahealth
- OpenClinica vs Epic Systems
- OpenClinica vs Cerner
- OpenClinica vs Amwell
- OpenClinica vs Practice Fusion
- OpenClinica vs NextGen Healthcare
- OpenClinica vs WebPT
- OpenClinica vs TherapyNotes
- OpenClinica vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- OpenClinica vs ChiroTouch
- OpenClinica vs Liberty Software
- OpenClinica vs Lunit
- OpenClinica vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- OpenClinica vs PioneerRx
- OpenClinica vs Rad AI
- OpenClinica vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- OpenClinica vs GNU Health
- OpenClinica vs Signant Health
- OpenClinica vs Oracle Clinical One
- OpenClinica vs OpenMRS
- OpenClinica vs DHIS2
- OpenClinica vs Bahmni
- OpenClinica vs Open Dental
- OpenClinica vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- OpenClinica vs Ambra Health
- OpenClinica vs SilverCloud by Amwell
- OpenClinica vs Epic MyChart
- OpenClinica vs Flo
- OpenClinica vs Gleamer
- OpenClinica vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- OpenClinica vs Included Health
- OpenClinica vs Rx30

