Healthcare · head to head
Kareo Clinical vs Paige

Kareo Clinical
Healthcare
Specialized EHR and practice management for independent and small practices
- From
- $89/month
- Rated
- -

Paige
Healthcare
Digital pathology AI holding the first FDA De Novo authorisation for a pathology algorithm, now part of Tempus
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kareo Clinical kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product; Paige the FDA authorisation is confined to prostate core needle biopsies, on compatible scanners, viewed through FullFocus, as an adjunct only; every other tissue type and every grading claim is outside that authorisation in the United States.
- They diverge on capability: Kareo Clinical covers Electronic Health Records, Paige covers Paige Prostate Detect.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kareo Clinical and Paige actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kareo Clinical | Paige |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $89/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Mobile | Web, Cloud, On-premise |
| Founded | 2010 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kareo Clinical
- Electronic Health Records
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Medical Billing
- ePrescribing
- Analytics
- Labs
- Pharmacies
Only in Paige
- Paige Prostate Detect
- Paige Prostate Grade and Quantify
- Perineural invasion detection
- Breast and lymph node applications
- FullFocus viewer
- Foundation models
- OmniScreen
- Paige Alba
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kareo Clinical
- Practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practicesnot Paige
- Electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinicsnot Paige
- Insurance claim submission and patient payment collectionnot Paige
Paige
- A reference laboratory processing high volumes of prostate core needle biopsies where a second read on every case is not staffablenot Kareo Clinical
- A pathology department already digitised that wants a documented safety net against missed small foci of cancernot Kareo Clinical
- A hospital laboratory struggling to recruit uropathology subspecialists and needing consistency across generalist reportingnot Kareo Clinical
- A pharmaceutical company needing consistent biomarker scoring across trial sites rather than site-by-site pathologist variabilitynot Kareo Clinical
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kareo Clinical
- Kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product
- Tebra publishes no rate: pricing varies with provider count, features and implementation requirements and is quoted during a demo
- Billing counts clinical providers such as MDs, DOs, NPs and PAs, so adding a prescriber raises the bill even though non clinical staff are free
- Electronic prescribing of controlled substances setup costs about $75 per provider as a one time fee
- PDMP integration costs $500 one time per facility plus about $50 per user per year
Paige
- The FDA authorisation is confined to prostate core needle biopsies, on compatible scanners, viewed through FullFocus, as an adjunct only; every other tissue type and every grading claim is outside that authorisation in the United States.
- The algorithm is worthless without a digital pathology programme already running, and slide scanning, storage and workflow typically cost far more than the software licence.
- Tempus acquired Paige in 2025, so the roadmap now competes for attention inside a genomics-led business, and the pathology-only buyer is no longer the primary customer.
- Scanner compatibility is a hard constraint rather than a preference, and a laboratory with an unsupported scanner fleet cannot use the authorised indication at all.
- Pricing is per case or per slide and unpublished, so a laboratory cannot model cost per reported case without entering a sales process.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kareo Clinical
$89/month- Clinical Starter$89/month
- EHR
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Clinical Plus$189/month
- Everything in Starter
- Billing
- Analytics
Paige
On request- Paige clinical applications$undefined/year
- Priced per case or per slide analysed under annual agreement
- Prostate, breast and other applications licensed separately
- Requires compatible whole slide scanner and the FullFocus viewer for the authorised indication
Which should you pick?
Choose Kareo Clinical if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want scheduling.
Choose Paige if
- You need paige prostate detect.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want paige prostate grade and quantify.
Questions people ask
- Is Kareo Clinical or Paige better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kareo Clinical starts at $89/month and Paige at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kareo Clinical or Paige?
- Kareo Clinical starts at $89/month and Paige at On request.
- Does Kareo Clinical or Paige run on more platforms?
- Kareo Clinical runs on Web, Mobile. Paige runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- What is Kareo Clinical best used for?
- Kareo Clinical is most often used for practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practices, electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinics, insurance claim submission and patient payment collection. Of those, practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practices and electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinics are not what Paige is typically brought in for.
- What can Kareo Clinical do that Paige cannot?
- Kareo Clinical covers Electronic Health Records, Scheduling, Patient Portal, Medical Billing. Paige covers Paige Prostate Detect, Paige Prostate Grade and Quantify, Perineural invasion detection, Breast and lymph node applications.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kareo Clinical: How much does Kareo Clinical (now Tebra) cost?
Kareo Clinical pricing is not published publicly. Pricing is based on the number of clinical providers in your practice, not seat licenses. Setup includes optional EPCS at $75/provider and PDMP Integration at $500 one-time per facility plus $50/user/year.
SourcePaige: What exactly is FDA authorised?
Paige Prostate Detect, as an adjunct for identifying areas of interest on digitised prostate core needle biopsy slides, viewed through the Paige FullFocus viewer on a compatible scanner. Nothing else in the portfolio holds that authorisation in the United States.
Kareo Clinical: Does Tebra charge for front desk staff and medical assistants?
No. Tebra provides unlimited non-clinical staff access at no extra cost. Front desk staff, medical assistants, billers, and office admins can all access scheduling, charting, and claims modules without increasing billing.
SourcePaige: Is the European position broader?
Yes. The Paige Prostate suite including grading and quantification received IVDR certification in 2025, which covers more than the United States authorisation.
Kareo Clinical: Are there reduced rates for low-volume practices on Tebra?
Yes. Practices with providers billing under 100 claims monthly receive lower-tier pricing for those low-volume providers.
SourcePaige: What did the pivotal study measure?
Pathologist cancer detection on individual slide images improved, with reported reductions in false negative and false positive readings. It measured pathologist performance with the tool, not standalone algorithm accuracy.
Paige: Who owns Paige now?
Tempus AI acquired Paige in 2025. Products remain branded Paige.
Related pages
More on Kareo Clinical
Other head to heads
- Kareo Clinical vs Athenahealth
- Kareo Clinical vs TheraNest
- Kareo Clinical vs Epic Systems
- Kareo Clinical vs Cerner
- Kareo Clinical vs Amwell
- Kareo Clinical vs Practice Fusion
- Kareo Clinical vs DrChrono
- Kareo Clinical vs NextGen Healthcare
- Kareo Clinical vs WebPT
- Kareo Clinical vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Kareo Clinical vs ChiroTouch
- Kareo Clinical vs eClinicalWorks
- Kareo Clinical vs Rx30
- Kareo Clinical vs Aidoc
- Kareo Clinical vs Annalise.ai
- Kareo Clinical vs Doctor on Demand
- Kareo Clinical vs Doxy.me
- Kareo Clinical vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Kareo Clinical vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Kareo Clinical vs Sectra
- Kareo Clinical vs PathAI
- Kareo Clinical vs Techcyte
- Kareo Clinical vs Lunit
- Kareo Clinical vs Gleamer
- Kareo Clinical vs Therapixel
- Kareo Clinical vs Koa Health
- Kareo Clinical vs Ambra Health
- Kareo Clinical vs DHIS2
- Kareo Clinical vs Kareo
- Kareo Clinical vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Kareo Clinical vs Omada Health
- Kareo Clinical vs OpenClinica
- Paige vs Athenahealth
- Paige vs TheraNest
- Paige vs Epic Systems
- Paige vs Cerner
- Paige vs Amwell
- Paige vs Practice Fusion
- Paige vs DrChrono
- Paige vs NextGen Healthcare
- Paige vs WebPT
- Paige vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Paige vs ChiroTouch
- Paige vs eClinicalWorks
- Paige vs Rx30
- Paige vs Aidoc
- Paige vs Annalise.ai
- Paige vs Doctor on Demand
- Paige vs Doxy.me
- Paige vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Paige vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Paige vs Sectra
- Paige vs PathAI
- Paige vs Techcyte
- Paige vs Lunit
- Paige vs Gleamer
- Paige vs Therapixel
- Paige vs Koa Health
- Paige vs Ambra Health
- Paige vs DHIS2
- Paige vs Kareo
- Paige vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Paige vs Omada Health
- Paige vs OpenClinica
