Healthcare · head to head
Cerner vs Paige

Cerner
Healthcare
Health information technology solutions for healthcare organizations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Paige
Healthcare
Digital pathology AI holding the first FDA De Novo authorisation for a pathology algorithm, now part of Tempus
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cerner no published pricing on vendor website; enterprise healthcare software requires custom quotes; Paige the FDA authorisation is confined to prostate core needle biopsies, on compatible scanners, viewed through FullFocus, as an adjunct only; every other tissue type and every grading claim is outside that authorisation in the United States.
- They diverge on capability: Cerner covers Electronic Health Records, Paige covers Paige Prostate Detect.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cerner and Paige actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cerner
- Electronic Health Records
- Revenue Cycle
- Population Health
- Patient Engagement
- HL7
- FHIR
- Lab Systems
- HIPAA
Only in Paige
- Paige Prostate Detect
- Paige Prostate Grade and Quantify
- Perineural invasion detection
- Breast and lymph node applications
- FullFocus viewer
- Foundation models
- OmniScreen
- Paige Alba
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cerner
- Hospital and acute care EHR for chart review and clinical documentationnot Paige
- Mobile clinical access for physicians and care teams on point-of-care devicesnot Paige
Paige
- A reference laboratory processing high volumes of prostate core needle biopsies where a second read on every case is not staffablenot Cerner
- A pathology department already digitised that wants a documented safety net against missed small foci of cancernot Cerner
- A hospital laboratory struggling to recruit uropathology subspecialists and needing consistency across generalist reportingnot Cerner
- A pharmaceutical company needing consistent biomarker scoring across trial sites rather than site-by-site pathologist variabilitynot Cerner
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cerner
- No published pricing on vendor website; enterprise healthcare software requires custom quotes
Paige
- The FDA authorisation is confined to prostate core needle biopsies, on compatible scanners, viewed through FullFocus, as an adjunct only; every other tissue type and every grading claim is outside that authorisation in the United States.
- The algorithm is worthless without a digital pathology programme already running, and slide scanning, storage and workflow typically cost far more than the software licence.
- Tempus acquired Paige in 2025, so the roadmap now competes for attention inside a genomics-led business, and the pathology-only buyer is no longer the primary customer.
- Scanner compatibility is a hard constraint rather than a preference, and a laboratory with an unsupported scanner fleet cannot use the authorised indication at all.
- Pricing is per case or per slide and unpublished, so a laboratory cannot model cost per reported case without entering a sales process.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cerner
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Cerner review.
Paige
On request- Paige clinical applications$undefined/year
- Priced per case or per slide analysed under annual agreement
- Prostate, breast and other applications licensed separately
- Requires compatible whole slide scanner and the FullFocus viewer for the authorised indication
Which should you pick?
Choose Cerner if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want revenue cycle.
Choose Paige if
- You need paige prostate detect.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want paige prostate grade and quantify.
Questions people ask
- Is Cerner or Paige better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cerner starts at On request and Paige at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cerner or Paige?
- Cerner starts at On request and Paige at On request.
- Does Cerner or Paige run on more platforms?
- Cerner runs on Web, iOS, Android. Paige runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- What is Cerner best used for?
- Cerner is most often used for hospital and acute care ehr for chart review and clinical documentation, mobile clinical access for physicians and care teams on point-of-care devices. Of those, hospital and acute care ehr for chart review and clinical documentation and mobile clinical access for physicians and care teams on point-of-care devices are not what Paige is typically brought in for.
- What can Cerner do that Paige cannot?
- Cerner covers Electronic Health Records, Revenue Cycle, Population Health, Patient Engagement. Paige covers Paige Prostate Detect, Paige Prostate Grade and Quantify, Perineural invasion detection, Breast and lymph node applications.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cerner: Does Cerner publish its pricing?
No, Cerner does not publish standard pricing. As an enterprise healthcare EHR vendor (now acquired by Oracle), pricing is customized per healthcare organization based on size, bed capacity, modules required, and implementation scope. Contact Oracle Health for pricing.
SourcePaige: What exactly is FDA authorised?
Paige Prostate Detect, as an adjunct for identifying areas of interest on digitised prostate core needle biopsy slides, viewed through the Paige FullFocus viewer on a compatible scanner. Nothing else in the portfolio holds that authorisation in the United States.
Paige: Is the European position broader?
Yes. The Paige Prostate suite including grading and quantification received IVDR certification in 2025, which covers more than the United States authorisation.
Paige: What did the pivotal study measure?
Pathologist cancer detection on individual slide images improved, with reported reductions in false negative and false positive readings. It measured pathologist performance with the tool, not standalone algorithm accuracy.
Paige: Who owns Paige now?
Tempus AI acquired Paige in 2025. Products remain branded Paige.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cerner vs Epic Systems
- Cerner vs Meditech
- Cerner vs Allscripts
- Cerner vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Cerner vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Cerner vs eClinicalWorks
- Cerner vs Athenahealth
- Cerner vs Dentrix
- Cerner vs PioneerRx
- Cerner vs Rad AI
- Cerner vs Aidoc
- Cerner vs Annalise.ai
- Cerner vs Doctor on Demand
- Cerner vs Epic MyChart
- Cerner vs NextGen Healthcare
- Cerner vs eClinicalWorks Prime
- Cerner vs athenaOne
- Cerner vs Rx30
- Cerner vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Cerner vs Sectra
- Cerner vs PathAI
- Cerner vs Techcyte
- Cerner vs Lunit
- Cerner vs Gleamer
- Cerner vs Therapixel
- Cerner vs Koa Health
- Cerner vs Ambra Health
- Cerner vs DHIS2
- Cerner vs Kareo
- Cerner vs Omada Health
- Cerner vs OpenClinica
- Cerner vs Kareo Clinical
- Paige vs Epic Systems
- Paige vs Meditech
- Paige vs Allscripts
- Paige vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Paige vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Paige vs eClinicalWorks
- Paige vs Athenahealth
- Paige vs Dentrix
- Paige vs PioneerRx
- Paige vs Rad AI
- Paige vs Aidoc
- Paige vs Annalise.ai
- Paige vs Doctor on Demand
- Paige vs Epic MyChart
- Paige vs NextGen Healthcare
- Paige vs eClinicalWorks Prime
- Paige vs athenaOne
- Paige vs Rx30
- Paige vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Paige vs Sectra
- Paige vs PathAI
- Paige vs Techcyte
- Paige vs Lunit
- Paige vs Gleamer
- Paige vs Therapixel
- Paige vs Koa Health
- Paige vs Ambra Health
- Paige vs DHIS2
- Paige vs Kareo
- Paige vs Omada Health
- Paige vs OpenClinica
- Paige vs Kareo Clinical
