Healthcare · head to head
Paige vs WebPT

Paige
Healthcare
Digital pathology AI holding the first FDA De Novo authorisation for a pathology algorithm, now part of Tempus
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

WebPT
Healthcare
EHR and practice management for physical therapy
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Paige the FDA authorisation is confined to prostate core needle biopsies, on compatible scanners, viewed through FullFocus, as an adjunct only; every other tissue type and every grading claim is outside that authorisation in the United States.; WebPT no rate published on pricing page; vendor requires demo booking or sales contact for quotes
- They diverge on capability: Paige covers Paige Prostate Detect, WebPT covers Electronic Health Records.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Paige and WebPT actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Paige
- Paige Prostate Detect
- Paige Prostate Grade and Quantify
- Perineural invasion detection
- Breast and lymph node applications
- FullFocus viewer
- Foundation models
- OmniScreen
- Paige Alba
Only in WebPT
- Electronic Health Records
- Scheduling
- Documentation
- Patient Portal
- Analytics
- Billing
- Insurance
- PECOS
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Paige
- A reference laboratory processing high volumes of prostate core needle biopsies where a second read on every case is not staffablenot WebPT
- A pathology department already digitised that wants a documented safety net against missed small foci of cancernot WebPT
- A hospital laboratory struggling to recruit uropathology subspecialists and needing consistency across generalist reportingnot WebPT
- A pharmaceutical company needing consistent biomarker scoring across trial sites rather than site-by-site pathologist variabilitynot WebPT
WebPT
- Multi-location physical therapy practices needing comprehensive billing automation and insurance processingnot Paige
- Rehabilitation therapy clinics requiring integrated AI-powered clinical documentationnot Paige
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Paige
- The FDA authorisation is confined to prostate core needle biopsies, on compatible scanners, viewed through FullFocus, as an adjunct only; every other tissue type and every grading claim is outside that authorisation in the United States.
- The algorithm is worthless without a digital pathology programme already running, and slide scanning, storage and workflow typically cost far more than the software licence.
- Tempus acquired Paige in 2025, so the roadmap now competes for attention inside a genomics-led business, and the pathology-only buyer is no longer the primary customer.
- Scanner compatibility is a hard constraint rather than a preference, and a laboratory with an unsupported scanner fleet cannot use the authorised indication at all.
- Pricing is per case or per slide and unpublished, so a laboratory cannot model cost per reported case without entering a sales process.
WebPT
- No rate published on pricing page; vendor requires demo booking or sales contact for quotes
- Specific pricing amounts not disclosed despite three pricing tiers being described
Pricing, plan by plan
Paige
On request- Paige clinical applications$undefined/year
- Priced per case or per slide analysed under annual agreement
- Prostate, breast and other applications licensed separately
- Requires compatible whole slide scanner and the FullFocus viewer for the authorised indication
WebPT
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the WebPT review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Paige if
- You need paige prostate detect.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want paige prostate grade and quantify.
Choose WebPT if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Cloud-based SaaS.
- You also want scheduling.
Questions people ask
- Is Paige or WebPT better?
- Neither clearly leads. Paige starts at On request and WebPT at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Paige or WebPT?
- Paige starts at On request and WebPT at On request.
- Does Paige or WebPT run on more platforms?
- Paige runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise. WebPT runs on Cloud-based SaaS.
- What is Paige best used for?
- Paige is most often used for a reference laboratory processing high volumes of prostate core needle biopsies where a second read on every case is not staffable, a pathology department already digitised that wants a documented safety net against missed small foci of cancer, a hospital laboratory struggling to recruit uropathology subspecialists and needing consistency across generalist reporting, a pharmaceutical company needing consistent biomarker scoring across trial sites rather than site-by-site pathologist variability. Of those, a reference laboratory processing high volumes of prostate core needle biopsies where a second read on every case is not staffable and a pathology department already digitised that wants a documented safety net against missed small foci of cancer are not what WebPT is typically brought in for.
- What can Paige do that WebPT cannot?
- Paige covers Paige Prostate Detect, Paige Prostate Grade and Quantify, Perineural invasion detection, Breast and lymph node applications. WebPT covers Electronic Health Records, Scheduling, Documentation, Patient Portal.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Paige: What exactly is FDA authorised?
Paige Prostate Detect, as an adjunct for identifying areas of interest on digitised prostate core needle biopsy slides, viewed through the Paige FullFocus viewer on a compatible scanner. Nothing else in the portfolio holds that authorisation in the United States.
WebPT: How much does WebPT cost?
WebPT pricing is customized based on your selected plan (Starter, Enhanced, or Ultimate) and any customizations your practice needs. Organizations must book a demo or contact sales to receive personalized pricing.
SourcePaige: Is the European position broader?
Yes. The Paige Prostate suite including grading and quantification received IVDR certification in 2025, which covers more than the United States authorisation.
WebPT: What are the three WebPT pricing tiers?
WebPT offers Starter for small cash-pay practices, Enhanced for growing practices that accept insurance and need billing, and Ultimate for larger practices requiring customization and advanced reporting.
SourcePaige: What did the pivotal study measure?
Pathologist cancer detection on individual slide images improved, with reported reductions in false negative and false positive readings. It measured pathologist performance with the tool, not standalone algorithm accuracy.
Paige: Who owns Paige now?
Tempus AI acquired Paige in 2025. Products remain branded Paige.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Paige vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Paige vs Sectra
- Paige vs PathAI
- Paige vs Techcyte
- Paige vs Lunit
- Paige vs Gleamer
- Paige vs Annalise.ai
- Paige vs Therapixel
- Paige vs Aidoc
- Paige vs Koa Health
- Paige vs Ambra Health
- Paige vs DHIS2
- Paige vs Kareo
- Paige vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Paige vs Omada Health
- Paige vs OpenClinica
- Paige vs Kareo Clinical
- Paige vs Athenahealth
- Paige vs TherapyNotes
- Paige vs SimplePractice
- Paige vs Epic Systems
- Paige vs Cerner
- Paige vs Amwell
- Paige vs DrChrono
- Paige vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Paige vs Practice Fusion
- Paige vs eClinicalWorks
- Paige vs ChiroTouch
- Paige vs Flo
- Paige vs Included Health
- Paige vs Epic MyChart
- WebPT vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- WebPT vs Sectra
- WebPT vs PathAI
- WebPT vs Techcyte
- WebPT vs Lunit
- WebPT vs Gleamer
- WebPT vs Annalise.ai
- WebPT vs Therapixel
- WebPT vs Aidoc
- WebPT vs Koa Health
- WebPT vs Ambra Health
- WebPT vs DHIS2
- WebPT vs Kareo
- WebPT vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- WebPT vs Omada Health
- WebPT vs OpenClinica
- WebPT vs Kareo Clinical
- WebPT vs Athenahealth
- WebPT vs TherapyNotes
- WebPT vs SimplePractice
- WebPT vs Epic Systems
- WebPT vs Cerner
- WebPT vs Amwell
- WebPT vs DrChrono
- WebPT vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- WebPT vs Practice Fusion
- WebPT vs eClinicalWorks
- WebPT vs ChiroTouch
- WebPT vs Flo
- WebPT vs Included Health
- WebPT vs Epic MyChart
