Lunitvs
Therapixel

Therapixel: Therapixel MammoScreen is a narrower mammography only option with its own FDA clearances including tomosynthesis

FDA cleared and CE marked AI for mammography, tomosynthesis and chest radiography
As of 1 September 2026, Lunit's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. Lunit sells detection AI for breast and chest imaging, and it now owns Volpara, which puts breast density assessment and risk pathways in the same portfolio. Softwr lists it under Healthcare. Lunit is made by Lunit Inc., available on Web.
Overview
Lunit is a South Korean medical AI company selling image analysis software for cancer screening. The main products are Lunit INSIGHT MMG for two dimensional mammography, Lunit INSIGHT DBT for digital breast tomosynthesis, and Lunit INSIGHT CXR for chest radiography, with a CXR Triage variant cleared in the United States. Lunit acquired Volpara Health, which added breast density measurement, dose tracking and the RiskPathways programme management tooling used by American breast centres. Lunit has also filed a 510(k) for INSIGHT Risk, a mammography based five year breast cancer risk prediction model, which was not cleared at the time of writing. The distinguishing fact is that the regulatory permission is product specific and region specific, and Lunit is one of the few AI vendors holding both FDA 510(k) clearances and CE marks under the European Medical Device Regulation across a screening portfolio deployed in more than sixty countries. A European breast screening programme and an American breast centre are therefore buying genuinely different permissions from the same catalogue, and a buyer who reads a global press release rather than the specific clearance for their product and jurisdiction will misjudge what they can deploy. Buyers are national and regional breast screening programmes, hospital radiology departments and, increasingly through Volpara, American breast imaging centres that need density notification compliance. The trade off is that detection AI in screening changes recall rates, and a programme that deploys Lunit without a plan for the resulting change in recalls and downstream diagnostic workup will import a cost it did not model. Screening AI is an operations decision before it is a software decision.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Lunit.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.

Therapixel: Therapixel MammoScreen is a narrower mammography only option with its own FDA clearances including tomosynthesis


Aidoc: Aidoc suits acute triage across head, chest and abdomen rather than cancer screening workflows
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Lunit INSIGHT
On request
Capabilities
Lunit INSIGHT MMG
Detection and localisation of suspicious lesions on two dimensional mammography with an abnormality score
Lunit INSIGHT DBT
Equivalent detection on digital breast tomosynthesis, addressing the reading time problem tomosynthesis created
Lunit INSIGHT CXR
Detection of multiple abnormality types on chest radiographs, with a separately cleared Triage variant in the United States
Volpara density assessment
Automated volumetric breast density measurement supporting patient density notification requirements
Volpara RiskPathways
Programme management for high risk breast patients, tracking supplemental screening and follow up
Volpara dose tracking
Records radiation dose per mammographic examination for quality programmes
PACS and mammography workstation integration
Results delivered into standard reading environments as secondary capture or structured findings
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Yes for specific products. INSIGHT MMG, INSIGHT DBT and INSIGHT CXR Triage hold FDA 510(k) clearances. INSIGHT Risk, the five year risk prediction model, has been filed but was not cleared at the time of writing.
That depends entirely on your jurisdiction and professional body guidance, not on the software. The CE mark permits clinical use; it does not authorise a workforce model.
Volumetric breast density measurement, dose tracking and RiskPathways high risk programme management, which are the things American breast centres buy for density notification compliance rather than for detection.
No. It is quoted per study or per annual volume, by product, with on premises and cloud priced differently.
Keep looking
French mammography AI with FDA clearances for 2D and tomosynthesis breast screening
FDA cleared radiology AI for triage and notification of time critical findings
AI digital pathology across clinical, veterinary and environmental laboratory disciplines
CE marked and FDA cleared imaging AI suite for bone trauma and chest, now owned by RadNet
Digital pathology image management with an FDA cleared platform for primary diagnosis
Digital pathology AI holding the first FDA De Novo authorisation for a pathology algorithm, now part of Tempus
Cancer detection AI for breast, prostate and gastric pathology deployed in routine clinical service, not just pilots
Enterprise radiology PACS and diagnostic image viewing from Philips
Multi-finding chest X-ray and head CT triage AI with FDA clearance on named findings, not on the whole model
Haematology and urinalysis analysers sold with the middleware that decides which results a scientist ever sees
Enterprise imaging and PACS from a Swedish vendor that also sells the pathology and cardiology modules on one platform
Employer purchased mental health benefit with a curated provider network and measurement based care
Server-side streaming PACS built for radiologists reading very large studies over thin connections
Period and cycle tracking app owned by German company Biowink, positioned around science based tracking and a published stance against sharing data with law enforcement
Open source health information platform run from the University of Oslo and used by national ministries
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Lunit, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Clinical laboratory middleware and informatics from a diagnostics instrument manufacturer
quoteOpen source hospital information system and EMR for low-resource hospitals, built on OpenMRS
Open source, no licence feePeriod and cycle tracking app owned by German company Biowink, positioned around science based tracking and a published stance against sharing data with law enforcement
Free with a Plus subscriptionPeriod and cycle tracking app that settled with the US FTC in 2021 over sharing health data with third parties despite promising not to
Free with a Premium subscriptionOpen source health information platform run from the University of Oslo and used by national ministries
Open source, no licence feeMulti-finding chest X-ray and head CT triage AI with FDA clearance on named findings, not on the whole model
quote