Healthcare · head to head
Epic Systems vs Lunit

Epic Systems
Healthcare
Leading electronic health records system for healthcare organizations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Lunit
Healthcare
FDA cleared and CE marked AI for mammography, tomosynthesis and chest radiography
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Epic Systems no free version or trial; enterprise pricing only with custom negotiation required; Lunit the regulatory permission differs by product and by region, and INSIGHT Risk has been filed with the FDA but not cleared, so a buyer who reads a corporate press release rather than the specific clearance for their product and jurisdiction will plan a deployment they cannot legally run.
- They diverge on capability: Epic Systems covers Electronic Health Records, Lunit covers Lunit INSIGHT MMG.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Epic Systems and Lunit actually diverge.
| Attribute | Epic Systems | Lunit |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Mobile | Web |
| Founded | 1979 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Epic Systems
- Electronic Health Records
- Revenue Cycle Management
- Patient Portal
- Clinical Decision Support
- Population Health
- Lab Systems
- Imaging Systems
- Pharmacy Systems
Only in Lunit
- Lunit INSIGHT MMG
- Lunit INSIGHT DBT
- Lunit INSIGHT CXR
- Volpara density assessment
- Volpara RiskPathways
- Volpara dose tracking
- PACS and mammography workstation integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Epic Systems
- Patient Carenot Lunit
- Medical Recordsnot Lunit
- Practice Managementnot Lunit
- Telehealthnot Lunit
Lunit
- A national breast screening programme evaluating AI as a second reader to reduce double reading workload where two human readers are currently mandatednot Epic Systems
- A breast centre that moved to tomosynthesis and now has reading times it cannot staff, wanting detection support on DBT specificallynot Epic Systems
- An American breast imaging centre needing automated volumetric density assessment to meet patient density notification requirements, which is what Volpara is bought fornot Epic Systems
- A tuberculosis or lung screening programme in a high volume, radiologist scarce setting using chest radiography triage to prioritise filmsnot Epic Systems
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Epic Systems
- No free version or trial; enterprise pricing only with custom negotiation required
- Lengthy implementation timeline: 12-24 months for single hospitals, 3-5 years for multi-system rollouts
- Customization and workflow adaptation requires extensive consulting services
- Very high licensing costs ranging from 100,000 to 30 million USD depending on organization size
Lunit
- The regulatory permission differs by product and by region, and INSIGHT Risk has been filed with the FDA but not cleared, so a buyer who reads a corporate press release rather than the specific clearance for their product and jurisdiction will plan a deployment they cannot legally run.
- Detection AI changes recall rates in screening, and the downstream cost of additional diagnostic workup lands on the programme rather than on the software budget, which is the cost most screening business cases omit.
- Performance is sensitive to the mammography vendor and acquisition protocol, so published results from a Hologic estate do not transfer to a GE or Siemens estate without local validation the buyer must fund.
- MMG, DBT and CXR are licensed separately and Volpara modules are separate again, so a breast centre wanting detection, density and risk pathways is assembling four line items rather than buying one product.
- Using AI as a replacement for one of two human readers is a workforce and liability decision that regulators and professional bodies treat differently in each country, so the saving that justifies the purchase may not be permitted where you operate.
Pricing, plan by plan
Epic Systems
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Epic Systems review.
Lunit
On request- Lunit INSIGHT$undefined/year
- Priced per study or per annual examination volume by product
- MMG, DBT and CXR licensed separately
- Volpara density and RiskPathways modules quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Epic Systems if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want revenue cycle management.
Questions people ask
- Is Epic Systems or Lunit better?
- Neither clearly leads. Epic Systems starts at On request and Lunit at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Epic Systems or Lunit?
- Epic Systems starts at On request and Lunit at On request.
- Does Epic Systems or Lunit run on more platforms?
- Epic Systems runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile. Lunit runs on Web.
- What is Epic Systems best used for?
- Epic Systems is most often used for patient care, medical records, practice management, telehealth. Of those, patient care and medical records are not what Lunit is typically brought in for.
- What can Epic Systems do that Lunit cannot?
- Epic Systems covers Electronic Health Records, Revenue Cycle Management, Patient Portal, Clinical Decision Support. Lunit covers Lunit INSIGHT MMG, Lunit INSIGHT DBT, Lunit INSIGHT CXR, Volpara density assessment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Epic Systems: What is Epic's market position?
Epic holds 36 percent of the U.S. EHR market and manages over 280 million patient records across 1,200+ healthcare organizations. Among hospitals with over 300 beds, Epic has 52 percent market share, and 71 percent market share in major academic medical centers as of 2026.
SourceLunit: Is Lunit FDA cleared?
Yes for specific products. INSIGHT MMG, INSIGHT DBT and INSIGHT CXR Triage hold FDA 510(k) clearances. INSIGHT Risk, the five year risk prediction model, has been filed but was not cleared at the time of writing.
Epic Systems: Is there a free trial or demo available?
Epic does not offer a free version or trial. The software is enterprise-only with custom pricing negotiated directly with organizations. Typical implementation timelines for single hospitals range from 12 to 24 months, and multi-hospital systems can take 3 to 5 years for phased rollouts.
SourceLunit: Can Lunit replace a second human reader in screening?
That depends entirely on your jurisdiction and professional body guidance, not on the software. The CE mark permits clinical use; it does not authorise a workforce model.
Epic Systems: How does Epic integrate with third-party systems?
Epic provides multiple integration pathways: FHIR R4 APIs, HL7 v2 messaging, CCDA document exchange, and proprietary APIs through Epic Showroom (formerly App Orchard). Over 1,000 certified apps are available in the marketplace, enabling real-time data synchronization and interoperability.
SourceLunit: What did the Volpara acquisition add?
Volumetric breast density measurement, dose tracking and RiskPathways high risk programme management, which are the things American breast centres buy for density notification compliance rather than for detection.
Epic Systems: What is included in Epic's unified platform?
Epic provides a truly unified system spanning inpatient, outpatient, emergency department, surgical, pharmacy, laboratory, radiology, billing, and population health on a single database. It includes appointment scheduling, medical billing, clinical decision support, patient portal (MyChart), telehealth capabilities, and analytics.
SourceLunit: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted per study or per annual volume, by product, with on premises and cloud priced differently.
Related pages
More on Epic Systems
Other head to heads
- Epic Systems vs Cerner
- Epic Systems vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Epic Systems vs Meditech
- Epic Systems vs Allscripts
- Epic Systems vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Epic Systems vs eClinicalWorks
- Epic Systems vs Athenahealth
- Epic Systems vs Dentrix
- Epic Systems vs ChiroTouch
- Epic Systems vs Ambra Health
- Epic Systems vs BestRx
- Epic Systems vs DrChrono
- Epic Systems vs Liberty Software
- Epic Systems vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Epic Systems vs Cerner PowerChart
- Epic Systems vs NextGen Healthcare
- Epic Systems vs athenaOne
- Epic Systems vs Therapixel
- Epic Systems vs Aidoc
- Epic Systems vs Techcyte
- Epic Systems vs Gleamer
- Epic Systems vs PathAI
- Epic Systems vs Paige
- Epic Systems vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Epic Systems vs Annalise.ai
- Epic Systems vs Sysmex
- Epic Systems vs Sectra
- Epic Systems vs Lyra Health
- Epic Systems vs Visage Imaging
- Epic Systems vs WebPT
- Epic Systems vs Clue
- Epic Systems vs DHIS2
- Lunit vs Cerner
- Lunit vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Lunit vs Meditech
- Lunit vs Allscripts
- Lunit vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Lunit vs eClinicalWorks
- Lunit vs Athenahealth
- Lunit vs Dentrix
- Lunit vs ChiroTouch
- Lunit vs Ambra Health
- Lunit vs BestRx
- Lunit vs DrChrono
- Lunit vs Liberty Software
- Lunit vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Lunit vs Cerner PowerChart
- Lunit vs NextGen Healthcare
- Lunit vs athenaOne
- Lunit vs Therapixel
- Lunit vs Aidoc
- Lunit vs Techcyte
- Lunit vs Gleamer
- Lunit vs PathAI
- Lunit vs Paige
- Lunit vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Lunit vs Annalise.ai
- Lunit vs Sysmex
- Lunit vs Sectra
- Lunit vs Lyra Health
- Lunit vs Visage Imaging
- Lunit vs WebPT
- Lunit vs Clue
- Lunit vs DHIS2
