Healthcare · head to head
Kareo vs Visage Imaging

Visage Imaging
Healthcare
Server-side streaming PACS built for radiologists reading very large studies over thin connections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kareo kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product; Visage Imaging pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- They diverge on capability: Kareo covers Electronic Health Records, Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kareo and Visage Imaging actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kareo | Visage Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $99/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Mobile | Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud |
| Founded | 2010 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kareo
- Electronic Health Records
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Medical Billing
- Payment Processing
- Labs
- Pharmacies
- Clearinghouses
Only in Visage Imaging
- Server-side rendering
- One Viewer
- Native multi-dimensional tools
- Digital breast tomosynthesis reading
- Open archive
- Cloud PACS operations
- AI accelerator
- On the fly patient jacket
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kareo
- Practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practicesnot Visage Imaging
- Electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinicsnot Visage Imaging
- Insurance claim submission and patient payment collectionnot Visage Imaging
Visage Imaging
- An academic health system whose radiologists read from home and cannot tolerate a thousand slice CT taking minutes to opennot Kareo
- A breast imaging service moving to tomosynthesis where study sizes have made the existing PACS unusable at volumenot Kareo
- A teleradiology group covering many client sites that needs one viewer rather than a client-specific workstation per contractnot Kareo
- A health system mid migration that needs priors from three legacy archives assembled into one patient jacket before the data move finishesnot Kareo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kareo
- Kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product
- Tebra publishes no rate: pricing varies with provider count, features and implementation requirements and is quoted during a demo
- Billing counts clinical providers such as MDs, DOs, NPs and PAs, so adding a prescriber raises the bill even though non clinical staff are free
- Electronic prescribing of controlled substances setup costs about $75 per provider as a one time fee
- PDMP integration costs $500 one time per facility plus about $50 per user per year
Visage Imaging
- Pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- Module breadth outside radiology is narrower than at Sectra or the large modality vendors, so a group planning to digitise pathology on the same platform will not find it here.
- Server-side rendering shifts the cost to central infrastructure, so the saving on radiologist workstations is partly offset by what you spend on servers or cloud compute.
- Pro Medicus concentrates on very large contracts, and smaller imaging groups report long sales cycles and little appetite from the vendor for deals below a certain volume.
- Diagnostic AI is third party, surfaced through the accelerator framework rather than developed in house, so algorithm licensing, validation and monitoring remain the buyer problem.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kareo
$99/month- Starter$99/month
- EHR
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Professional$199/month
- Everything in Starter
- Billing
- Reporting
Visage Imaging
On request- Visage 7 enterprise contract$undefined/year
- Transaction pricing per exam with a minimum annual volume commitment
- Seven to ten year terms typical for health system contracts
- Contract totals for major deals are disclosed by Pro Medicus to the ASX
Which should you pick?
Choose Kareo if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want scheduling.
Choose Visage Imaging if
- You need server-side rendering.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- You also want one viewer.
Questions people ask
- Is Kareo or Visage Imaging better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kareo starts at $99/month and Visage Imaging at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kareo or Visage Imaging?
- Kareo starts at $99/month and Visage Imaging at On request.
- Does Kareo or Visage Imaging run on more platforms?
- Kareo runs on Web, Mobile. Visage Imaging runs on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- What is Kareo best used for?
- Kareo is most often used for practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practices, electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinics, insurance claim submission and patient payment collection. Of those, practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practices and electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinics are not what Visage Imaging is typically brought in for.
- What can Kareo do that Visage Imaging cannot?
- Kareo covers Electronic Health Records, Scheduling, Patient Portal, Medical Billing. Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering, One Viewer, Native multi-dimensional tools, Digital breast tomosynthesis reading.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kareo: Does Kareo publish its pricing?
No. Kareo (now rebranded as Tebra) uses custom per-practice pricing that varies based on the number of providers, features needed, and implementation requirements. Pricing is determined during a demo with the sales team.
SourceVisage Imaging: Who owns Visage Imaging?
Pro Medicus Limited, listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. That listing means major contract values and terms are publicly announced.
Kareo: Are there discounts for adding multiple modules?
Yes. Tebra states that many practices qualify for bundled pricing or volume incentives when adopting multiple modules like EHR, billing, and patient experience tools together.
SourceVisage Imaging: How is Visage priced?
Per exam, against a minimum annual volume, on multi-year terms. Because Pro Medicus discloses large contract totals and durations to the market, buyers can estimate a per exam rate before entering negotiation.
Kareo: What are the additional costs for controlled substance prescribing?
For providers who prescribe controlled substances, EPCS setup costs approximately $75 per provider as a one-time fee, and PDMP integration costs $500 one-time per facility plus around $50 per user per year.
SourceVisage Imaging: Is Visage 7 FDA cleared for diagnostic interpretation?
Yes, Visage 7 holds 510(k) clearance for diagnostic viewing including mammography and tomosynthesis on validated displays. Confirm the exact cleared modality list for your intended use.
Kareo: Does Kareo offer a free trial?
Kareo's website does not mention a free trial option. Access to pricing and trial arrangements requires contacting the sales team to request a demo.
SourceVisage Imaging: Does it work as a full cloud PACS?
Yes, Visage 7 runs complete PACS operations in the cloud rather than cloud viewing over an on-premise archive.
Related pages
More on Visage Imaging
Other head to heads
- Kareo vs DrChrono
- Kareo vs Athenahealth
- Kareo vs Epic Systems
- Kareo vs Cerner
- Kareo vs Amwell
- Kareo vs Practice Fusion
- Kareo vs NextGen Healthcare
- Kareo vs WebPT
- Kareo vs TherapyNotes
- Kareo vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Kareo vs ChiroTouch
- Kareo vs Liberty Software
- Kareo vs Lunit
- Kareo vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Kareo vs PioneerRx
- Kareo vs Rad AI
- Kareo vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Kareo vs Sectra
- Kareo vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Kareo vs Gleamer
- Kareo vs Annalise.ai
- Kareo vs OpenMRS
- Kareo vs Signant Health
- Kareo vs Ambra Health
- Kareo vs Aidoc
- Kareo vs Clue
- Kareo vs Allscripts
- Kareo vs Dentrix
- Kareo vs DHIS2
- Kareo vs Flo
- Kareo vs Epic MyChart
- Visage Imaging vs DrChrono
- Visage Imaging vs Athenahealth
- Visage Imaging vs Epic Systems
- Visage Imaging vs Cerner
- Visage Imaging vs Amwell
- Visage Imaging vs Practice Fusion
- Visage Imaging vs NextGen Healthcare
- Visage Imaging vs WebPT
- Visage Imaging vs TherapyNotes
- Visage Imaging vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Visage Imaging vs ChiroTouch
- Visage Imaging vs Liberty Software
- Visage Imaging vs Lunit
- Visage Imaging vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Visage Imaging vs PioneerRx
- Visage Imaging vs Rad AI
- Visage Imaging vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Visage Imaging vs Sectra
- Visage Imaging vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Visage Imaging vs Gleamer
- Visage Imaging vs Annalise.ai
- Visage Imaging vs OpenMRS
- Visage Imaging vs Signant Health
- Visage Imaging vs Ambra Health
- Visage Imaging vs Aidoc
- Visage Imaging vs Clue
- Visage Imaging vs Allscripts
- Visage Imaging vs Dentrix
- Visage Imaging vs DHIS2
- Visage Imaging vs Flo
- Visage Imaging vs Epic MyChart

