Software · head to head
Elastic APM vs Honeybadger
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Elastic APM pricing is not published on the product page; cost follows the underlying Elastic deployment rather than being quoted per host or per service; Honeybadger the free Developer plan is limited to one user, 5,000 errors per month, 50 MB per day of logging and one uptime monitor
- They diverge on capability: Elastic APM covers Performance monitoring, Honeybadger covers Uptime monitoring.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Elastic APM and Honeybadger actually diverge.
| Attribute | Elastic APM | Honeybadger |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | subscription |
| Founded | 2011 | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Elastic APM
- Performance monitoring
- Transaction tracing
- Custom metrics
Only in Honeybadger
- Uptime monitoring
- Status pages
- Incident management
Both cover
- Error tracking
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Elastic APM
- Distributed tracing across microservicesnot Honeybadger
- Auto-instrumenting Java, .NET, Python, Go, Node.js, Ruby, PHP and C++ servicesnot Honeybadger
- OpenTelemetry-native collection through the Elastic distributionsnot Honeybadger
- Correlating latency and errors with machine learningnot Honeybadger
- Monitoring LLM calls alongside application tracesnot Honeybadger
Honeybadger
- Exception and error tracking for Ruby, Elixir, PHP, Python and JavaScript applicationsnot Elastic APM
- Uptime and cron heartbeat monitoring alongside error datanot Elastic APM
- Publishing a public status page for a small SaaS productnot Elastic APM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Elastic APM
- Pricing is not published on the product page; cost follows the underlying Elastic deployment rather than being quoted per host or per service
- Self-managed deployment means running and scaling Elasticsearch yourself
- Serverless does not carry every capability the hosted option does
Honeybadger
- The free Developer plan is limited to one user, 5,000 errors per month, 50 MB per day of logging and one uptime monitor
- SSO, unlimited teams and priority support require the Business plan at $80 per month
- Error data retention is 15 days on Developer, 90 days on Team and 180 days on Business
- Log and event retention is 7 days on the free plan and up to 30 days on Team
- Premium integrations including Jira, PagerDuty, SMS and webhooks are excluded from the free Developer plan
- S3 archiving of Insights events is not available on the Developer plan
- Uptime check frequency is capped at 5 minutes on Developer and 2 minutes on Team; 1 minute checks require Business
Pricing, plan by plan
Elastic APM
Free- FreeFree
- Performance monitoring
- Error tracking
- Transaction tracing
Honeybadger
Free- FreeFree
- Error tracking
- Uptime monitoring
- Status pages
Which should you pick?
Choose Elastic APM if
- You need performance monitoring.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want transaction tracing.
Choose Honeybadger if
- You need uptime monitoring.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want status pages.
Questions people ask
- Is Elastic APM or Honeybadger better?
- Neither clearly leads. Elastic APM starts at Free and Honeybadger at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Elastic APM or Honeybadger?
- Elastic APM starts at Free and Honeybadger at Free.
- Does Elastic APM or Honeybadger run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Elastic APM for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Elastic APM best used for?
- Elastic APM is most often used for distributed tracing across microservices, auto-instrumenting java, .net, python, go, node.js, ruby, php and c++ services, opentelemetry-native collection through the elastic distributions, correlating latency and errors with machine learning. Of those, distributed tracing across microservices and auto-instrumenting java, .net, python, go, node.js, ruby, php and c++ services are not what Honeybadger is typically brought in for.
- What can Elastic APM do that Honeybadger cannot?
- Elastic APM covers Performance monitoring, Transaction tracing, Custom metrics. Honeybadger covers Uptime monitoring, Status pages, Incident management. Both handle Error tracking, API, Webhooks, REST.
Related pages
More on Elastic APM
More on Honeybadger
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Elastic APM vs Elastic Stack
- Elastic APM vs New Relic
- Elastic APM vs Datadog Logs
- Elastic APM vs Coralogix
- Elastic APM vs Grafana Loki
- Elastic APM vs CloudWatch
- Elastic APM vs Dynatrace
- Elastic APM vs InfluxDB
- Elastic APM vs Airbrake
- Elastic APM vs AppDynamics
- Elastic APM vs Axiom
- Elastic APM vs Azure Monitor
- Elastic APM vs Better Stack
- Elastic APM vs Bugsnag
- Elastic APM vs Dynatrace Logs
- Elastic APM vs Elastic
- Elastic APM vs Elasticsearch Service
- Elastic APM vs ELK Stack
- Honeybadger vs Elastic Stack
- Honeybadger vs New Relic
- Honeybadger vs Datadog Logs
- Honeybadger vs Coralogix
- Honeybadger vs Grafana Loki
- Honeybadger vs CloudWatch
- Honeybadger vs Dynatrace
- Honeybadger vs InfluxDB
- Honeybadger vs Airbrake
- Honeybadger vs AppDynamics
- Honeybadger vs Axiom
- Honeybadger vs Azure Monitor
- Honeybadger vs Better Stack
- Honeybadger vs Bugsnag
- Honeybadger vs Dynatrace Logs
- Honeybadger vs Elastic
- Honeybadger vs Elasticsearch Service
- Honeybadger vs ELK Stack


