Logging · head to head
Azure Monitor vs Honeybadger
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Azure Monitor billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does; Honeybadger the free Developer plan is limited to one user, 5,000 errors per month, 50 MB per day of logging and one uptime monitor
- They diverge on capability: Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Honeybadger covers Error tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Monitor and Honeybadger actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Monitor | Honeybadger |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | freemium |
| Founded | 2010 | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Monitor
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
- Custom dashboards
Only in Honeybadger
- Error tracking
- Uptime monitoring
- Status pages
- Incident management
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Monitor
- Collecting logs and metrics from Azure resourcesnot Honeybadger
- Alerting on metric thresholds and log queriesnot Honeybadger
- Application performance monitoring through Application Insightsnot Honeybadger
- Long-term log retention for compliancenot Honeybadger
- Querying operational data with KQLnot Honeybadger
Honeybadger
- Exception and error tracking for Ruby, Elixir, PHP, Python and JavaScript applicationsnot Azure Monitor
- Uptime and cron heartbeat monitoring alongside error datanot Azure Monitor
- Publishing a public status page for a small SaaS productnot Azure Monitor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Monitor
- Billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does
- Only the first 5 GB a month of Analytics logs is free per billing account
- Retention beyond the base period is charged per GB per month, up to 2 years interactive and 12 years long term
- Log queries and search jobs are billed per GB scanned, so investigating an incident costs money
- Alert rules are billed per time series for metrics and by execution frequency for logs
- The pricing page shows placeholders rather than rates until a region and currency are chosen
Honeybadger
- The free Developer plan is limited to one user, 5,000 errors per month, 50 MB per day of logging and one uptime monitor
- SSO, unlimited teams and priority support require the Business plan at $80 per month
- Error data retention is 15 days on Developer, 90 days on Team and 180 days on Business
- Log and event retention is 7 days on the free plan and up to 30 days on Team
- Premium integrations including Jira, PagerDuty, SMS and webhooks are excluded from the free Developer plan
- S3 archiving of Insights events is not available on the Developer plan
- Uptime check frequency is capped at 5 minutes on Developer and 2 minutes on Team; 1 minute checks require Business
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Monitor
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
Honeybadger
Free- DeveloperFree
- 5,000 errors per month
- 50 MB per day logging
- 1 monitor
- Team$26/month
- 50,000 errors per month
- 100 MB per day logging
- 5 monitors
- Business$80/month
- 50,000 errors per month
- 100 MB per day logging
- 5 monitors
Which should you pick?
Choose Azure Monitor if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want metrics collection.
Choose Honeybadger if
- You need error tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want uptime monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Monitor or Honeybadger better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Monitor starts at Free and Honeybadger at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Monitor or Honeybadger?
- Azure Monitor starts at Free and Honeybadger at Free.
- Does Azure Monitor or Honeybadger run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Azure Monitor for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Azure Monitor best used for?
- Azure Monitor is most often used for collecting logs and metrics from azure resources, alerting on metric thresholds and log queries, application performance monitoring through application insights, long-term log retention for compliance. Of those, collecting logs and metrics from azure resources and alerting on metric thresholds and log queries are not what Honeybadger is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Monitor do that Honeybadger cannot?
- Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Metrics collection, Alerts and notifications, Custom dashboards. Honeybadger covers Error tracking, Uptime monitoring, Status pages, Incident management. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Azure Monitor: How does Azure Monitor billing work?
Billing is based on data volume ingested into Azure Monitor. Additional charges apply separately for alerts, notifications, web tests, and data export. Activity log and platform metrics are automatically collected with an Azure subscription.
SourceHoneybadger: Is Honeybadger free?
Honeybadger offers a free Developer plan permanently with 5,000 errors per month, 50 MB per day logging, and 1 monitor, supporting unlimited projects for a single user.
SourceAzure Monitor: What savings are available with Azure Monitor?
Capacity reservations offer up to 36% savings compared to standard pay-as-you-go pricing when you commit to reserved capacity upfront.
SourceHoneybadger: How much does the Honeybadger Team plan cost annually?
The Team plan costs $26 per month billed annually at $286 per year, providing 50,000 errors per month with unlimited users and 90-day error retention.
SourceAzure Monitor: Is there a free tier for Azure Monitor?
No dedicated free tier exists. Activity log and platform metrics are automatically collected with an Azure subscription, but detailed monitoring requires additional configuration and associated costs.
SourceHoneybadger: What's the difference between Honeybadger Business and Team plans?
Both Team and Business plans include 50,000 errors per month, but Business adds 180-day error retention (vs 90-day), includes enterprise security and compliance features, and supports unlimited teams.
SourceRelated pages
More on Azure Monitor
More on Honeybadger
Other head to heads
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic Stack
- Azure Monitor vs New Relic
- Azure Monitor vs Datadog Logs
- Azure Monitor vs Coralogix
- Azure Monitor vs Cronitor
- Azure Monitor vs Dynatrace
- Azure Monitor vs Airbrake
- Azure Monitor vs AppDynamics
- Azure Monitor vs Raygun
- Azure Monitor vs Retrace
- Azure Monitor vs Rollbar
- Azure Monitor vs Sematext
- Azure Monitor vs Splunk Cloud
- Azure Monitor vs Stackdriver
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic APM
- Azure Monitor vs Splunk Enterprise
- Azure Monitor vs Openstatus
- Azure Monitor vs Checkly
- Azure Monitor vs CloudWatch
- Azure Monitor vs Better Stack
- Azure Monitor vs Loggly
- Azure Monitor vs Logz.io
- Azure Monitor vs Loki
- Azure Monitor vs Mezmo
- Azure Monitor vs Logstash
- Azure Monitor vs New Relic Logs
- Honeybadger vs Elastic Stack
- Honeybadger vs New Relic
- Honeybadger vs Datadog Logs
- Honeybadger vs Coralogix
- Honeybadger vs Cronitor
- Honeybadger vs Dynatrace
- Honeybadger vs Airbrake
- Honeybadger vs AppDynamics
- Honeybadger vs Raygun
- Honeybadger vs Retrace
- Honeybadger vs Rollbar
- Honeybadger vs Sematext
- Honeybadger vs Splunk Cloud
- Honeybadger vs Stackdriver
- Honeybadger vs Elastic APM
- Honeybadger vs Splunk Enterprise
- Honeybadger vs Openstatus
- Honeybadger vs Checkly
- Honeybadger vs CloudWatch
- Honeybadger vs Better Stack
- Honeybadger vs Loggly
- Honeybadger vs Logz.io
- Honeybadger vs Loki
- Honeybadger vs Mezmo
- Honeybadger vs Logstash
- Honeybadger vs New Relic Logs


