Software · head to head
CloudWatch vs Honeybadger
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CloudWatch the free tier covers 5 GB of log ingestion and 10 custom metrics a month, after which log ingestion is $0.50 per GB from 5 to 30 GB; Honeybadger the free Developer plan is limited to one user, 5,000 errors per month, 50 MB per day of logging and one uptime monitor
- They diverge on capability: CloudWatch covers Metrics collection, Honeybadger covers Error tracking.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CloudWatch and Honeybadger actually diverge.
| Attribute | CloudWatch | Honeybadger |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | subscription |
| Founded | 2006 | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CloudWatch
- Metrics collection
- Log aggregation
- Dashboards
- Alarms and notifications
Only in Honeybadger
- Error tracking
- Uptime monitoring
- Status pages
- Incident management
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CloudWatch
- Metrics and log collection for AWS workloadsnot Honeybadger
- Alarming on thresholds across AWS servicesnot Honeybadger
- Querying logs with Logs Insightsnot Honeybadger
- Live tailing logs during an incidentnot Honeybadger
- Distributed tracing alongside X-Raynot Honeybadger
Honeybadger
- Exception and error tracking for Ruby, Elixir, PHP, Python and JavaScript applicationsnot CloudWatch
- Uptime and cron heartbeat monitoring alongside error datanot CloudWatch
- Publishing a public status page for a small SaaS productnot CloudWatch
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CloudWatch
- The free tier covers 5 GB of log ingestion and 10 custom metrics a month, after which log ingestion is $0.50 per GB from 5 to 30 GB
- Custom metrics are $0.30 each for the first 10,000, so instrumenting broadly gets expensive before volume discounts apply
- Each custom dashboard beyond the free three is $3 a month
- Alarms are billed at $0.10 per alarm metric a month, with high-resolution alarms costing more
- Log storage beyond the free 5 GB is $0.03 per GB per month on top of the ingestion charge
Honeybadger
- The free Developer plan is limited to one user, 5,000 errors per month, 50 MB per day of logging and one uptime monitor
- SSO, unlimited teams and priority support require the Business plan at $80 per month
- Error data retention is 15 days on Developer, 90 days on Team and 180 days on Business
- Log and event retention is 7 days on the free plan and up to 30 days on Team
- Premium integrations including Jira, PagerDuty, SMS and webhooks are excluded from the free Developer plan
- S3 archiving of Insights events is not available on the Developer plan
- Uptime check frequency is capped at 5 minutes on Developer and 2 minutes on Team; 1 minute checks require Business
Pricing, plan by plan
CloudWatch
Free- FreeFree
- Metrics collection
- Log aggregation
- Dashboards
Honeybadger
Free- FreeFree
- Error tracking
- Uptime monitoring
- Status pages
Which should you pick?
Choose CloudWatch if
- You need metrics collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want log aggregation.
Choose Honeybadger if
- You need error tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want uptime monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is CloudWatch or Honeybadger better?
- Neither clearly leads. CloudWatch starts at Free and Honeybadger at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CloudWatch or Honeybadger?
- CloudWatch starts at Free and Honeybadger at Free.
- Does CloudWatch or Honeybadger run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use CloudWatch for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CloudWatch best used for?
- CloudWatch is most often used for metrics and log collection for aws workloads, alarming on thresholds across aws services, querying logs with logs insights, live tailing logs during an incident. Of those, metrics and log collection for aws workloads and alarming on thresholds across aws services are not what Honeybadger is typically brought in for.
- What can CloudWatch do that Honeybadger cannot?
- CloudWatch covers Metrics collection, Log aggregation, Dashboards, Alarms and notifications. Honeybadger covers Error tracking, Uptime monitoring, Status pages, Incident management. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
More on Honeybadger
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- CloudWatch vs Elastic Stack
- CloudWatch vs New Relic
- CloudWatch vs Datadog Logs
- CloudWatch vs Coralogix
- CloudWatch vs Grafana Loki
- CloudWatch vs Dynatrace
- CloudWatch vs InfluxDB
- CloudWatch vs Airbrake
- CloudWatch vs AppDynamics
- CloudWatch vs Axiom
- CloudWatch vs Azure Monitor
- CloudWatch vs Better Stack
- CloudWatch vs Bugsnag
- CloudWatch vs Dynatrace Logs
- CloudWatch vs Elastic
- CloudWatch vs Elastic APM
- CloudWatch vs Elasticsearch Service
- CloudWatch vs ELK Stack
- Honeybadger vs Elastic Stack
- Honeybadger vs New Relic
- Honeybadger vs Datadog Logs
- Honeybadger vs Coralogix
- Honeybadger vs Grafana Loki
- Honeybadger vs Dynatrace
- Honeybadger vs InfluxDB
- Honeybadger vs Airbrake
- Honeybadger vs AppDynamics
- Honeybadger vs Axiom
- Honeybadger vs Azure Monitor
- Honeybadger vs Better Stack
- Honeybadger vs Bugsnag
- Honeybadger vs Dynatrace Logs
- Honeybadger vs Elastic
- Honeybadger vs Elastic APM
- Honeybadger vs Elasticsearch Service
- Honeybadger vs ELK Stack


