Manufacturing · head to head
Hippo CMMS vs Tractian

Hippo CMMS
Manufacturing
Straightforward maintenance management, now part of Eptura
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tractian
Field Service
CMMS with published per-user pricing plus vibration sensors sold as a separate per-asset subscription
- From
- $60/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hippo CMMS no longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price; Tractian sensors are excluded from both published CMMS tiers and are quoted per monitored asset, so the transparent rate card covers only the part of the deployment that costs least.
- They diverge on capability: Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps, Tractian covers Published per-user pricing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hippo CMMS and Tractian actually diverge.
| Attribute | Hippo CMMS | Tractian |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $60/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Category | Manufacturing | Field Service |
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hippo CMMS
- Interactive site maps
- Work order management
- Preventive maintenance
- Equipment records
- Vendor management
- Mobile access
Only in Tractian
- Published per-user pricing
- Unlimited requesters
- Smart Trac sensors
- Automatic work order creation
- Mobile execution
- Preventive maintenance planning
- Power BI connector
- ERP integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hippo CMMS
- Facilities teams wanting a CMMS that a non-specialist can operatenot Tractian
- Sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find itnot Tractian
- Existing Hippo customers evaluating whether to stay within Epturanot Tractian
- Organisations wanting maintenance inside a broader workplace management suitenot Tractian
Tractian
- A mid-market plant replacing spreadsheet maintenance planning where hundreds of operators must report faults but only a dozen plan worknot Hippo CMMS
- Instrumenting critical motors and pumps and having detected faults become work orders without an integration projectnot Hippo CMMS
- A maintenance manager who needs a defensible budget figure before an approval meeting rather than a quote in three weeksnot Hippo CMMS
- A multi-site manufacturer wanting the same CMMS and sensor platform across Brazilian, Mexican and United States plantsnot Hippo CMMS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hippo CMMS
- No longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price
- Pricing is not published, which makes it hard to compare against MaintainX or Limble without a sales process
- The simplicity that was its selling point becomes a ceiling for organisations with complex asset hierarchies
- Reporting is basic against competitors that have invested heavily in analytics
- Product direction now follows Eptura workplace strategy rather than maintenance-specific needs
Tractian
- Sensors are excluded from both published CMMS tiers and are quoted per monitored asset, so the transparent rate card covers only the part of the deployment that costs least.
- Smart Trac hardware reports into the Tractian platform, so a plant that later changes analytics vendor writes off the installed sensor base.
- The five-user minimum on Standard and ten-user minimum on Enterprise put a floor under the cost that small maintenance teams cannot get below.
- ERP integration, single sign-on and the Power BI connector are Enterprise-only, so an organisation needing SAP integration pays the higher rate for every licensed user including technicians who need none of it.
- The company is young and venture-funded with rapid product expansion, so enterprise features are newer than the core CMMS and reference sites at large industrial scale are fewer than for established EAM vendors.
Pricing, plan by plan
Hippo CMMS
On request- Eptura Asset$undefined/month
- Work order management
- Preventive maintenance
- Asset records
Tractian
$60/month- Standard$60/month
- From 60 USD per user per month, billed annually
- Minimum five users
- Unlimited assets and unlimited requester accounts
- Enterprise$100/month
- From 100 USD per user per month, billed annually
- Minimum ten users
- Single sign-on and custom entities
- Bundle$undefined/year
- CMMS combined with condition monitoring sensors
- Priced per monitored asset, quoted rather than published
- Includes failure detection, root cause analysis and reliability support
Which should you pick?
Choose Hippo CMMS if
- You need interactive site maps.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want work order management.
Choose Tractian if
- You need published per-user pricing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want unlimited requesters.
Questions people ask
- Is Hippo CMMS or Tractian better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hippo CMMS starts at On request and Tractian at $60/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hippo CMMS or Tractian?
- Hippo CMMS starts at On request and Tractian at $60/month.
- Does Hippo CMMS or Tractian run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Hippo CMMS best used for?
- Hippo CMMS is most often used for facilities teams wanting a cmms that a non-specialist can operate, sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find it, existing hippo customers evaluating whether to stay within eptura, organisations wanting maintenance inside a broader workplace management suite. Of those, facilities teams wanting a cmms that a non-specialist can operate and sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find it are not what Tractian is typically brought in for.
- What can Hippo CMMS do that Tractian cannot?
- Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps, Work order management, Preventive maintenance, Equipment records. Tractian covers Published per-user pricing, Unlimited requesters, Smart Trac sensors, Automatic work order creation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hippo CMMS: Is Hippo CMMS still available?
Not as a standalone purchase. It was acquired by Eptura and its capabilities are part of Eptura Asset. Existing customers are still served.
Tractian: What does the CMMS actually cost?
Standard is from 60 USD per user per month with five users minimum, Enterprise from 100 USD with ten minimum, both billed annually.
Hippo CMMS: What was distinctive about it?
Interactive facility maps. Placing assets on a floor plan and raising work orders from the drawing is a genuinely different way to navigate a site, and it is why it retained users against slicker competitors.
Tractian: Are the sensors included?
No. Both CMMS tiers explicitly exclude sensors, which are priced per monitored asset under a separate bundle that is not published.
Hippo CMMS: What does it cost?
Not published. Eptura quotes, which is a change from Hippo, whose pricing was easier to establish.
Tractian: Do fault reporters need licences?
No. Requester accounts are unlimited on both tiers, which is the main reason the per-user price is workable for large plants.
Hippo CMMS: Should a new buyer consider it?
Evaluate Eptura Asset on its own terms, against MaintainX and Limble. Choosing it because of Hippo reviews written before the acquisition is a mistake.
Tractian: Can I use the sensors with another platform?
No. Smart Trac hardware reports to the Tractian platform.
Hippo CMMS: What happens to existing customers?
They continue to be supported within Eptura. The practical question is whether the broader workplace suite fits, since that is where the product roadmap now points.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Hippo CMMS vs Maintenance Connection
- Hippo CMMS vs eMaint
- Hippo CMMS vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Hippo CMMS vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Hippo CMMS vs OpenBOM
- Hippo CMMS vs Propel
- Hippo CMMS vs ProShop ERP
- Hippo CMMS vs Fusion 360
- Hippo CMMS vs SolidWorks
- Hippo CMMS vs MachineMetrics
- Hippo CMMS vs LabVIEW
- Hippo CMMS vs AVEVA System Platform
- Hippo CMMS vs 3YOURMIND
- Hippo CMMS vs AMFG
- Hippo CMMS vs Aras Innovator
- Hippo CMMS vs Arena PLM
- Hippo CMMS vs Authentise
- Hippo CMMS vs FaciliWorks
- Hippo CMMS vs IFS Ultimo EAM
- Hippo CMMS vs Fracttal One
- Hippo CMMS vs MaintainX
- Hippo CMMS vs Redlist
- Hippo CMMS vs Joblogic
- Hippo CMMS vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- Hippo CMMS vs Commusoft
- Hippo CMMS vs Properly
- Hippo CMMS vs BigChange
- Hippo CMMS vs Repsly
- Hippo CMMS vs Jobber
- Hippo CMMS vs Tradify
- Hippo CMMS vs Vonigo
- Hippo CMMS vs Workiz
- Hippo CMMS vs Zuper
- Hippo CMMS vs FieldEdge
- Tractian vs Maintenance Connection
- Tractian vs eMaint
- Tractian vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Tractian vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Tractian vs OpenBOM
- Tractian vs Propel
- Tractian vs ProShop ERP
- Tractian vs Fusion 360
- Tractian vs SolidWorks
- Tractian vs MachineMetrics
- Tractian vs LabVIEW
- Tractian vs AVEVA System Platform
- Tractian vs 3YOURMIND
- Tractian vs AMFG
- Tractian vs Aras Innovator
- Tractian vs Arena PLM
- Tractian vs Authentise
- Tractian vs FaciliWorks
- Tractian vs IFS Ultimo EAM
- Tractian vs Fracttal One
- Tractian vs MaintainX
- Tractian vs Redlist
- Tractian vs Joblogic
- Tractian vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- Tractian vs Commusoft
- Tractian vs Properly
- Tractian vs BigChange
- Tractian vs Repsly
- Tractian vs Jobber
- Tractian vs Tradify
- Tractian vs Vonigo
- Tractian vs Workiz
- Tractian vs Zuper
- Tractian vs FieldEdge
