Manufacturing · head to head
Hippo CMMS vs IFS Ultimo EAM

Hippo CMMS
Manufacturing
Straightforward maintenance management, now part of Eptura
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

IFS Ultimo EAM
Field Service
Dutch enterprise asset management with role-based user tiers, now sold inside the IFS portfolio
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hippo CMMS no longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price; IFS Ultimo EAM iFS sells two overlapping EAM products, Ultimo and IFS Cloud EAM, and a buyer signing a multi-year term is depending on the vendor funding both roadmaps at current levels.
- They diverge on capability: Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps, IFS Ultimo EAM covers Three user licence types.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hippo CMMS and IFS Ultimo EAM actually diverge.
| Attribute | Hippo CMMS | IFS Ultimo EAM |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Manufacturing | Field Service |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hippo CMMS
- Interactive site maps
- Work order management
- Preventive maintenance
- Equipment records
- Vendor management
- Mobile access
Only in IFS Ultimo EAM
- Three user licence types
- Industry solutions
- Safety and compliance
- Mobile maintenance
- Spare parts management
- Contractor management
- Fleet management module
- Condition-based triggers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hippo CMMS
- Facilities teams wanting a CMMS that a non-specialist can operatenot IFS Ultimo EAM
- Sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find itnot IFS Ultimo EAM
- Existing Hippo customers evaluating whether to stay within Epturanot IFS Ultimo EAM
- Organisations wanting maintenance inside a broader workplace management suitenot IFS Ultimo EAM
IFS Ultimo EAM
- A hospital where hundreds of ward staff must report faults but only the estates planners need full maintenance functionalitynot Hippo CMMS
- A manufacturer needing permits to work and lockout-tagout tied to the same work order as the maintenance tasknot Hippo CMMS
- A public transport operator managing vehicle maintenance and depot facilities in one system rather than twonot Hippo CMMS
- A mid-sized European site that wants an EAM configured for its industry in weeks rather than a blank platform implementationnot Hippo CMMS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hippo CMMS
- No longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price
- Pricing is not published, which makes it hard to compare against MaintainX or Limble without a sales process
- The simplicity that was its selling point becomes a ceiling for organisations with complex asset hierarchies
- Reporting is basic against competitors that have invested heavily in analytics
- Product direction now follows Eptura workplace strategy rather than maintenance-specific needs
IFS Ultimo EAM
- IFS sells two overlapping EAM products, Ultimo and IFS Cloud EAM, and a buyer signing a multi-year term is depending on the vendor funding both roadmaps at current levels.
- IFS does not publish list pricing for Ultimo, so the widely quoted entry figures come from third-party review sites rather than the vendor and should not be used to build a budget.
- Strength is concentrated in Europe, and organisations needing local-language support, partners and implementation resource in North America or Asia will find the channel much thinner.
- The industry solution templates that accelerate go-live also encode assumptions, and organisations whose processes differ from the template spend the saved time on reconfiguration instead.
- Reporting and analytics beyond the standard set generally push customers to Power BI, so plan for a separate business intelligence licence and the modelling work behind it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Hippo CMMS
On request- Eptura Asset$undefined/month
- Work order management
- Preventive maintenance
- Asset records
IFS Ultimo EAM
On request- IFS Ultimo EAM$undefined/month
- Priced per user with Self-Service, Light and Full tiers at different rates
- Price per user does not change with the number of industry solutions enabled
- Cloud subscription is the standard route; on-premise is legacy
Which should you pick?
Choose Hippo CMMS if
- You need interactive site maps.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want work order management.
Choose IFS Ultimo EAM if
- You need three user licence types.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want industry solutions.
Questions people ask
- Is Hippo CMMS or IFS Ultimo EAM better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hippo CMMS starts at On request and IFS Ultimo EAM at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hippo CMMS or IFS Ultimo EAM?
- Hippo CMMS starts at On request and IFS Ultimo EAM at On request.
- Does Hippo CMMS or IFS Ultimo EAM run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Hippo CMMS best used for?
- Hippo CMMS is most often used for facilities teams wanting a cmms that a non-specialist can operate, sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find it, existing hippo customers evaluating whether to stay within eptura, organisations wanting maintenance inside a broader workplace management suite. Of those, facilities teams wanting a cmms that a non-specialist can operate and sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find it are not what IFS Ultimo EAM is typically brought in for.
- What can Hippo CMMS do that IFS Ultimo EAM cannot?
- Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps, Work order management, Preventive maintenance, Equipment records. IFS Ultimo EAM covers Three user licence types, Industry solutions, Safety and compliance, Mobile maintenance.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hippo CMMS: Is Hippo CMMS still available?
Not as a standalone purchase. It was acquired by Eptura and its capabilities are part of Eptura Asset. Existing customers are still served.
IFS Ultimo EAM: Is Ultimo still sold separately from IFS Cloud EAM?
Yes. IFS positions Ultimo at the mid-market and IFS Cloud EAM at large enterprises, and sells both.
Hippo CMMS: What was distinctive about it?
Interactive facility maps. Placing assets on a floor plan and raising work orders from the drawing is a genuinely different way to navigate a site, and it is why it retained users against slicker competitors.
IFS Ultimo EAM: How does the user licensing work?
Three tiers: Self-Service for request and view, Light for occasional use, Full for planners and managers. Rates differ per tier.
Hippo CMMS: What does it cost?
Not published. Eptura quotes, which is a change from Hippo, whose pricing was easier to establish.
IFS Ultimo EAM: Does enabling more industry solutions cost more per user?
No. The per-user price stays the same regardless of how many industry solutions you select.
Hippo CMMS: Should a new buyer consider it?
Evaluate Eptura Asset on its own terms, against MaintainX and Limble. Choosing it because of Hippo reviews written before the acquisition is a mistake.
IFS Ultimo EAM: Is on-premise still available?
Cloud subscription is the route IFS sells. On-premise exists in the installed base but is not the direction of travel.
Hippo CMMS: What happens to existing customers?
They continue to be supported within Eptura. The practical question is whether the broader workplace suite fits, since that is where the product roadmap now points.
Related pages
More on IFS Ultimo EAM
Other head to heads
- Hippo CMMS vs Maintenance Connection
- Hippo CMMS vs eMaint
- Hippo CMMS vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Hippo CMMS vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Hippo CMMS vs OpenBOM
- Hippo CMMS vs Propel
- Hippo CMMS vs ProShop ERP
- Hippo CMMS vs Fusion 360
- Hippo CMMS vs SolidWorks
- Hippo CMMS vs MachineMetrics
- Hippo CMMS vs LabVIEW
- Hippo CMMS vs AVEVA System Platform
- Hippo CMMS vs 3YOURMIND
- Hippo CMMS vs AMFG
- Hippo CMMS vs Aras Innovator
- Hippo CMMS vs Arena PLM
- Hippo CMMS vs Authentise
- Hippo CMMS vs Fracttal One
- Hippo CMMS vs Redlist
- Hippo CMMS vs Tractian
- Hippo CMMS vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- Hippo CMMS vs MaintainX
- Hippo CMMS vs FaciliWorks
- Hippo CMMS vs Joblogic
- Hippo CMMS vs Commusoft
- Hippo CMMS vs Jobber
- Hippo CMMS vs BigChange
- Hippo CMMS vs FieldEdge
- Hippo CMMS vs Housecall Pro
- Hippo CMMS vs ResortCleaning
- Hippo CMMS vs Synchroteam
- Hippo CMMS vs Tradify
- Hippo CMMS vs Vonigo
- Hippo CMMS vs Workiz
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Maintenance Connection
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs eMaint
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs OpenBOM
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Propel
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs ProShop ERP
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Fusion 360
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs SolidWorks
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs MachineMetrics
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs LabVIEW
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs AVEVA System Platform
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs 3YOURMIND
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs AMFG
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Aras Innovator
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Arena PLM
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Authentise
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Fracttal One
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Redlist
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Tractian
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs MaintainX
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs FaciliWorks
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Joblogic
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Commusoft
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Jobber
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs BigChange
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs FieldEdge
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Housecall Pro
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs ResortCleaning
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Synchroteam
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Tradify
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Vonigo
- IFS Ultimo EAM vs Workiz
