Field Service · head to head
Fracttal One vs Hippo CMMS

Fracttal One
Field Service
Cloud maintenance management with strong Spanish and Portuguese language support
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Hippo CMMS
Manufacturing
Straightforward maintenance management, now part of Eptura
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fracttal One pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared against MaintainX or Limble without a sales conversation; Hippo CMMS no longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price
- They diverge on capability: Fracttal One covers Preventive and predictive, Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fracttal One and Hippo CMMS actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fracttal One | Hippo CMMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Field Service | Manufacturing |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fracttal One
- Preventive and predictive
- IoT condition monitoring
- Inventory and purchasing
- Multi-language and multi-currency
- Dashboards and KPIs
Only in Hippo CMMS
- Interactive site maps
- Preventive maintenance
- Equipment records
- Vendor management
- Mobile access
Both cover
- Work order management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fracttal One
- Maintenance operations in Latin America and Spain needing native-language supportnot Hippo CMMS
- Multinationals standardising maintenance across Spanish and Portuguese speaking sitesnot Hippo CMMS
- Plants adding IoT sensors to move beyond calendar-based maintenancenot Hippo CMMS
- Organisations wanting regional implementation partners rather than remote onboardingnot Hippo CMMS
Hippo CMMS
- Facilities teams wanting a CMMS that a non-specialist can operatenot Fracttal One
- Sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find itnot Fracttal One
- Existing Hippo customers evaluating whether to stay within Epturanot Fracttal One
- Organisations wanting maintenance inside a broader workplace management suitenot Fracttal One
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fracttal One
- Pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared against MaintainX or Limble without a sales conversation
- English-language documentation and community are thinner than the Spanish equivalents, which reverses the usual problem
- Smaller partner and integration ecosystem than the US-headquartered competitors
- Less recognised on English-language shortlists, which can make internal approval harder in multinational procurement
- The IoT capability requires sensor investment to be worth anything, and the business case for that is separate from the CMMS decision
Hippo CMMS
- No longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price
- Pricing is not published, which makes it hard to compare against MaintainX or Limble without a sales process
- The simplicity that was its selling point becomes a ceiling for organisations with complex asset hierarchies
- Reporting is basic against competitors that have invested heavily in analytics
- Product direction now follows Eptura workplace strategy rather than maintenance-specific needs
Pricing, plan by plan
Fracttal One
On request- Starter$undefined/user/month
- Work orders
- Asset management
- Mobile app
- Pro$undefined/user/month
- Preventive maintenance
- Inventory
- Purchasing
- Enterprise$undefined/user/month
- IoT and condition monitoring
- API access
- SSO
Hippo CMMS
On request- Eptura Asset$undefined/month
- Work order management
- Preventive maintenance
- Asset records
Which should you pick?
Choose Fracttal One if
- You need preventive and predictive.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want iot condition monitoring.
Choose Hippo CMMS if
- You need interactive site maps.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want preventive maintenance.
Questions people ask
- Is Fracttal One or Hippo CMMS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fracttal One starts at On request and Hippo CMMS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fracttal One or Hippo CMMS?
- Fracttal One starts at On request and Hippo CMMS at On request.
- Does Fracttal One or Hippo CMMS run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Fracttal One best used for?
- Fracttal One is most often used for maintenance operations in latin america and spain needing native-language support, multinationals standardising maintenance across spanish and portuguese speaking sites, plants adding iot sensors to move beyond calendar-based maintenance, organisations wanting regional implementation partners rather than remote onboarding. Of those, maintenance operations in latin america and spain needing native-language support and multinationals standardising maintenance across spanish and portuguese speaking sites are not what Hippo CMMS is typically brought in for.
- What can Fracttal One do that Hippo CMMS cannot?
- Fracttal One covers Preventive and predictive, IoT condition monitoring, Inventory and purchasing, Multi-language and multi-currency. Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps, Preventive maintenance, Equipment records, Vendor management. Both handle Work order management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fracttal One: Where is Fracttal strongest?
Latin America and Spain. Native Spanish and Portuguese support, regional implementation partners and local invoicing decide more maintenance software purchases in those markets than feature comparisons do.
Hippo CMMS: Is Hippo CMMS still available?
Not as a standalone purchase. It was acquired by Eptura and its capabilities are part of Eptura Asset. Existing customers are still served.
Fracttal One: What does it cost?
Not published. Pricing is quoted by tier and region, which is normal for this market but makes direct comparison harder.
Hippo CMMS: What was distinctive about it?
Interactive facility maps. Placing assets on a floor plan and raising work orders from the drawing is a genuinely different way to navigate a site, and it is why it retained users against slicker competitors.
Fracttal One: Does it do predictive maintenance?
It supports sensor-triggered maintenance through its IoT layer. Whether that constitutes predictive maintenance depends on the sensors and the analysis behind them, not on the CMMS.
Hippo CMMS: What does it cost?
Not published. Eptura quotes, which is a change from Hippo, whose pricing was easier to establish.
Fracttal One: Is it a good choice for a US-only operation?
Usually not the obvious one. MaintainX, UpKeep and Limble have published pricing, larger English-language ecosystems and more local reference customers.
Hippo CMMS: Should a new buyer consider it?
Evaluate Eptura Asset on its own terms, against MaintainX and Limble. Choosing it because of Hippo reviews written before the acquisition is a mistake.
Fracttal One: How does it compare to the US mid-market CMMS?
Functionally comparable. The decision is normally about language, support hours and local presence rather than about features.
Hippo CMMS: What happens to existing customers?
They continue to be supported within Eptura. The practical question is whether the broader workplace suite fits, since that is where the product roadmap now points.
Related pages
More on Fracttal One
Other head to heads
- Fracttal One vs MaintainX
- Fracttal One vs IFS Ultimo EAM
- Fracttal One vs Tractian
- Fracttal One vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- Fracttal One vs FaciliWorks
- Fracttal One vs Redlist
- Fracttal One vs Commusoft
- Fracttal One vs Joblogic
- Fracttal One vs Vonigo
- Fracttal One vs Jobber
- Fracttal One vs ServiceTitan
- Fracttal One vs Housecall Pro
- Fracttal One vs FieldEdge
- Fracttal One vs Percepto
- Fracttal One vs Repsly
- Fracttal One vs Maintenance Connection
- Fracttal One vs eMaint
- Fracttal One vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Fracttal One vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Fracttal One vs OpenBOM
- Fracttal One vs Propel
- Fracttal One vs ProShop ERP
- Fracttal One vs Fusion 360
- Fracttal One vs SolidWorks
- Fracttal One vs MachineMetrics
- Fracttal One vs LabVIEW
- Fracttal One vs AVEVA System Platform
- Fracttal One vs 3YOURMIND
- Fracttal One vs AMFG
- Fracttal One vs Aras Innovator
- Fracttal One vs Arena PLM
- Fracttal One vs Authentise
- Hippo CMMS vs MaintainX
- Hippo CMMS vs IFS Ultimo EAM
- Hippo CMMS vs Tractian
- Hippo CMMS vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- Hippo CMMS vs FaciliWorks
- Hippo CMMS vs Redlist
- Hippo CMMS vs Commusoft
- Hippo CMMS vs Joblogic
- Hippo CMMS vs Vonigo
- Hippo CMMS vs Jobber
- Hippo CMMS vs ServiceTitan
- Hippo CMMS vs Housecall Pro
- Hippo CMMS vs FieldEdge
- Hippo CMMS vs Percepto
- Hippo CMMS vs Repsly
- Hippo CMMS vs Maintenance Connection
- Hippo CMMS vs eMaint
- Hippo CMMS vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Hippo CMMS vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Hippo CMMS vs OpenBOM
- Hippo CMMS vs Propel
- Hippo CMMS vs ProShop ERP
- Hippo CMMS vs Fusion 360
- Hippo CMMS vs SolidWorks
- Hippo CMMS vs MachineMetrics
- Hippo CMMS vs LabVIEW
- Hippo CMMS vs AVEVA System Platform
- Hippo CMMS vs 3YOURMIND
- Hippo CMMS vs AMFG
- Hippo CMMS vs Aras Innovator
- Hippo CMMS vs Arena PLM
- Hippo CMMS vs Authentise
