Softwr

Field Service · head to head

Fracttal One vs Hippo CMMS

Fracttal One logo

Fracttal One

Field Service

Cloud maintenance management with strong Spanish and Portuguese language support

From
On request
Rated
-
Hippo CMMS logo

Hippo CMMS

Manufacturing

Straightforward maintenance management, now part of Eptura

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Fracttal One pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared against MaintainX or Limble without a sales conversation; Hippo CMMS no longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price
  • They diverge on capability: Fracttal One covers Preventive and predictive, Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Fracttal One and Hippo CMMS actually diverge.

Attributes where Fracttal One and Hippo CMMS differ
AttributeFracttal OneHippo CMMS
CategoryField ServiceManufacturing

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Fracttal One

  • Preventive and predictive
  • IoT condition monitoring
  • Inventory and purchasing
  • Multi-language and multi-currency
  • Dashboards and KPIs

Only in Hippo CMMS

  • Interactive site maps
  • Preventive maintenance
  • Equipment records
  • Vendor management
  • Mobile access

Both cover

  • Work order management

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Fracttal One

  • Maintenance operations in Latin America and Spain needing native-language supportnot Hippo CMMS
  • Multinationals standardising maintenance across Spanish and Portuguese speaking sitesnot Hippo CMMS
  • Plants adding IoT sensors to move beyond calendar-based maintenancenot Hippo CMMS
  • Organisations wanting regional implementation partners rather than remote onboardingnot Hippo CMMS

Hippo CMMS

  • Facilities teams wanting a CMMS that a non-specialist can operatenot Fracttal One
  • Sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find itnot Fracttal One
  • Existing Hippo customers evaluating whether to stay within Epturanot Fracttal One
  • Organisations wanting maintenance inside a broader workplace management suitenot Fracttal One

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Fracttal One

  • Pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared against MaintainX or Limble without a sales conversation
  • English-language documentation and community are thinner than the Spanish equivalents, which reverses the usual problem
  • Smaller partner and integration ecosystem than the US-headquartered competitors
  • Less recognised on English-language shortlists, which can make internal approval harder in multinational procurement
  • The IoT capability requires sensor investment to be worth anything, and the business case for that is separate from the CMMS decision

Hippo CMMS

  • No longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price
  • Pricing is not published, which makes it hard to compare against MaintainX or Limble without a sales process
  • The simplicity that was its selling point becomes a ceiling for organisations with complex asset hierarchies
  • Reporting is basic against competitors that have invested heavily in analytics
  • Product direction now follows Eptura workplace strategy rather than maintenance-specific needs

Pricing, plan by plan

Fracttal One

On request
  • Starter$undefined/user/month
    • Work orders
    • Asset management
    • Mobile app
  • Pro$undefined/user/month
    • Preventive maintenance
    • Inventory
    • Purchasing
  • Enterprise$undefined/user/month
    • IoT and condition monitoring
    • API access
    • SSO

Hippo CMMS

On request
  • Eptura Asset$undefined/month
    • Work order management
    • Preventive maintenance
    • Asset records

Which should you pick?

Choose Fracttal One if

  • You need preventive and predictive.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want iot condition monitoring.

Choose Hippo CMMS if

  • You need interactive site maps.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want preventive maintenance.

Questions people ask

Is Fracttal One or Hippo CMMS better?
Neither clearly leads. Fracttal One starts at On request and Hippo CMMS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Fracttal One or Hippo CMMS?
Fracttal One starts at On request and Hippo CMMS at On request.
Does Fracttal One or Hippo CMMS run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Fracttal One best used for?
Fracttal One is most often used for maintenance operations in latin america and spain needing native-language support, multinationals standardising maintenance across spanish and portuguese speaking sites, plants adding iot sensors to move beyond calendar-based maintenance, organisations wanting regional implementation partners rather than remote onboarding. Of those, maintenance operations in latin america and spain needing native-language support and multinationals standardising maintenance across spanish and portuguese speaking sites are not what Hippo CMMS is typically brought in for.
What can Fracttal One do that Hippo CMMS cannot?
Fracttal One covers Preventive and predictive, IoT condition monitoring, Inventory and purchasing, Multi-language and multi-currency. Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps, Preventive maintenance, Equipment records, Vendor management. Both handle Work order management.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Fracttal One: Where is Fracttal strongest?

Latin America and Spain. Native Spanish and Portuguese support, regional implementation partners and local invoicing decide more maintenance software purchases in those markets than feature comparisons do.

Hippo CMMS: Is Hippo CMMS still available?

Not as a standalone purchase. It was acquired by Eptura and its capabilities are part of Eptura Asset. Existing customers are still served.

Fracttal One: What does it cost?

Not published. Pricing is quoted by tier and region, which is normal for this market but makes direct comparison harder.

Hippo CMMS: What was distinctive about it?

Interactive facility maps. Placing assets on a floor plan and raising work orders from the drawing is a genuinely different way to navigate a site, and it is why it retained users against slicker competitors.

Fracttal One: Does it do predictive maintenance?

It supports sensor-triggered maintenance through its IoT layer. Whether that constitutes predictive maintenance depends on the sensors and the analysis behind them, not on the CMMS.

Hippo CMMS: What does it cost?

Not published. Eptura quotes, which is a change from Hippo, whose pricing was easier to establish.

Fracttal One: Is it a good choice for a US-only operation?

Usually not the obvious one. MaintainX, UpKeep and Limble have published pricing, larger English-language ecosystems and more local reference customers.

Hippo CMMS: Should a new buyer consider it?

Evaluate Eptura Asset on its own terms, against MaintainX and Limble. Choosing it because of Hippo reviews written before the acquisition is a mistake.

Fracttal One: How does it compare to the US mid-market CMMS?

Functionally comparable. The decision is normally about language, support hours and local presence rather than about features.

Hippo CMMS: What happens to existing customers?

They continue to be supported within Eptura. The practical question is whether the broader workplace suite fits, since that is where the product roadmap now points.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads