Maps · head to head
Atlas.co vs Mappedin

Atlas.co
Maps
Browser-based collaborative GIS with published per-seat pricing and a free tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Mappedin
Maps
Enterprise indoor mapping platform that helps venues create interactive 3D maps, wayfinding
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Atlas.co analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.; Mappedin location naming is the leading source of integration failures, requiring manual cleanup of AI-generated labels
- They diverge on capability: Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, Mappedin covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Atlas.co and Mappedin actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Atlas.co
- Browser GIS
- Workflow builder
- Geocoding
- Collaboration
- Data import
- Cheap viewer seats
- Export and embed
- AI credits
Only in Mappedin
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Atlas.co
- A renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no GIS analyst availablenot Mappedin
- A planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only GIS licencesnot Mappedin
- A consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop GIS installs across a distributed teamnot Mappedin
- An analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop GISnot Mappedin
Mappedin
- Indoor navigation and map experience for buildingsnot Atlas.co
- Operations management for facility and workplace planningnot Atlas.co
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Atlas.co
- Analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.
- Geocoding and workflow runs are metered per tier, and a single large address batch can exhaust a month’s Pro allowance in one afternoon, forcing an upgrade for a one-off job.
- The company is at pre-seed stage with roughly $2m raised and a small team, so buyers embedding it in a business process carry meaningful continuity risk.
- Annual billing is required to get the advertised prices, which removes the flexibility that would otherwise make a young vendor a low-risk trial.
- There is no offline or field capability at all, so any organisation whose spatial work includes data collection needs a second tool alongside it.
Mappedin
- Location naming is the leading source of integration failures, requiring manual cleanup of AI-generated labels
- Multi-building campus maps not supported for Microsoft Places integration
- No native digital signage CMS for integrated sign management
- Limited analytics capabilities compared to competitors in complex enterprise environments
Pricing, plan by plan
Atlas.co
Free- StarterFree
- 3 projects
- 3 editors
- 1 GB storage
- Pro$23/month
- 10 projects
- 10 GB storage
- 10,000 geocoding runs
- Team$72/month
- Unlimited projects
- Viewer seats at $7 per month
- 25,000 geocoding runs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited storage and workflows
- 100,000 geocoding runs
- White-labelled embeds
Mappedin
Free- FreeFree
- 1 map
- Basic indoor mapping
- No SDK access
- Custom Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Subscription-based on square footage
- Full platform access
- SDKs and APIs
Which should you pick?
Choose Atlas.co if
- You need browser gis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want workflow builder.
Choose Mappedin if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Atlas.co or Mappedin better?
- Neither clearly leads. Atlas.co starts at Free and Mappedin at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Atlas.co or Mappedin?
- Atlas.co starts at Free and Mappedin at Free.
- Does Atlas.co or Mappedin run on more platforms?
- Atlas.co runs on Web. Mappedin runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud.
- Can I use Atlas.co for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Atlas.co best used for?
- Atlas.co is most often used for a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available, a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences, a consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop gis installs across a distributed team, an analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop gis. Of those, a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available and a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences are not what Mappedin is typically brought in for.
- What can Atlas.co do that Mappedin cannot?
- Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, Workflow builder, Geocoding, Collaboration. Mappedin covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Atlas.co: How much does Atlas.co cost?
Starter is free, Pro is $23 per user per month and Team is $72 per editor per month with viewers at $7, all billed annually. Enterprise is quoted.
Mappedin: Does Mappedin support multi-building campus mapping?
Mappedin supports multi-building deployments, but the Places integration requires each building to be mapped as a separate venue rather than as one unified campus map.
SourceAtlas.co: Can it replace ArcGIS or QGIS?
For visualisation, light analysis and sharing, often yes. For raster, network or geodetic work, no.
Mappedin: How long does it take to deploy Mappedin for a large venue?
Large venue deployments typically go live within 30-60 days from contract signature. The Mappedin Maker platform enables rapid map creation from floor plans, with professional map-making services available for additional fees.
SourceAtlas.co: What is the viewer seat?
A read-only seat at $7 per month on the Team plan, intended for stakeholders who consume maps rather than build them.
Mappedin: What platforms and SDKs does Mappedin provide?
Mappedin offers SDKs for Web, iOS, and Android, plus comprehensive APIs and webhooks for integrations. The platform supports venues including airports, shopping malls, stadiums, workplaces, and healthcare facilities.
SourceAtlas.co: Where is the company based?
Oslo, Norway. It was founded in 2021 and has raised around $2m in pre-seed funding.
Mappedin: Does Mappedin have a free plan?
Yes, Mappedin offers a free plan for creating one initial digital map at app.mappedin.com. Pricing is subscription-based and scales with building size in square footage or square meters.
SourceAtlas.co: Is there a free tier?
Yes, Starter gives three projects, three editors and 1 GB of storage with metered geocoding and workflow runs.
Mappedin: What compliance certifications does Mappedin have?
Mappedin is SOC2 certified, GDPR compliant, and WCAG accessible. The platform includes real-time data management and analytics capabilities.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Atlas.co vs Esri ArcGIS
- Atlas.co vs CARTO
- Atlas.co vs QGIS
- Atlas.co vs Felt
- Atlas.co vs Correlator3D
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Atlas.co vs Global Mapper
- Atlas.co vs GRASS GIS
- Atlas.co vs Fused
- Atlas.co vs deck.gl
- Atlas.co vs Ride with GPS
- Atlas.co vs Kepler.gl
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Places API
- Atlas.co vs Geoapify
- Atlas.co vs Google Maps
- Atlas.co vs Leica Infinity
- Atlas.co vs Mapbox
- Atlas.co vs IndoorAtlas
- Atlas.co vs Google Maps Platform
- Atlas.co vs LocationIQ
- Atlas.co vs HERE Technologies
- Atlas.co vs Leaflet
- Atlas.co vs Radar
- Atlas.co vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Atlas.co vs Apple Maps
- Atlas.co vs Trailforks
- Atlas.co vs Navmii GPS
- Atlas.co vs Nominatim
- Atlas.co vs OpenLayers
- Atlas.co vs OpenRouteService
- Atlas.co vs OpenStreetMap
- Atlas.co vs OsmAnd
- Mappedin vs Esri ArcGIS
- Mappedin vs CARTO
- Mappedin vs QGIS
- Mappedin vs Felt
- Mappedin vs Correlator3D
- Mappedin vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Mappedin vs Global Mapper
- Mappedin vs GRASS GIS
- Mappedin vs Fused
- Mappedin vs deck.gl
- Mappedin vs Ride with GPS
- Mappedin vs Kepler.gl
- Mappedin vs Foursquare Places API
- Mappedin vs Geoapify
- Mappedin vs Google Maps
- Mappedin vs Leica Infinity
- Mappedin vs Mapbox
- Mappedin vs IndoorAtlas
- Mappedin vs Google Maps Platform
- Mappedin vs LocationIQ
- Mappedin vs HERE Technologies
- Mappedin vs Leaflet
- Mappedin vs Radar
- Mappedin vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Mappedin vs Apple Maps
- Mappedin vs Trailforks
- Mappedin vs Navmii GPS
- Mappedin vs Nominatim
- Mappedin vs OpenLayers
- Mappedin vs OpenRouteService
- Mappedin vs OpenStreetMap
- Mappedin vs OsmAnd
