Maps · head to head
Felt vs Leaflet

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Leaflet
Maps
Leading open-source JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps, used by millions of developers worldwide
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; Leaflet 2D only with no support for 3D features, tilt, or rotation
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Leaflet covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and Leaflet actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in Leaflet
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot Leaflet
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot Leaflet
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot Leaflet
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot Leaflet
Leaflet
- Embedding interactive maps in a web pagenot Felt
- Mobile-friendly map interfaces across desktop and mobile browsersnot Felt
- Mapping where bundle size matters, at roughly 42 KB of JavaScriptnot Felt
- Extending a basic map with plugins rather than adopting a full platformnot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
Leaflet
- 2D only with no support for 3D features, tilt, or rotation
- Performance degrades when rendering large datasets of complex vector geometries without optimization
- Limited dynamic styling support; style is fixed on the server when using raster tiles
- Lacks native support for WMS features; requires plugins like Leaflet.WMS and complex feature identification is cumbersome
- Requires external tile service for map imagery; does not provide map tiles natively
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
Leaflet
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Leaflet review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose Leaflet if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or Leaflet better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and Leaflet at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or Leaflet?
- Felt starts at Free and Leaflet at Free.
- Does Felt or Leaflet run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. Leaflet runs on Web.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what Leaflet is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that Leaflet cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. Leaflet covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
Leaflet: Is Leaflet free and open source?
Yes. Leaflet is open-source JavaScript library licensed for free use. Over 400 plugins add capabilities like marker clustering, heatmaps, drawing tools, geocoding, and routing.
SourceFelt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
Leaflet: How do I include Leaflet in my project via CDN?
Leaflet is available on multiple free CDNs including unpkg, cdnjs, and jsDelivr. Include the CSS stylesheet from https://unpkg.com/[email protected]/dist/leaflet.css and JavaScript from https://unpkg.com/[email protected]/dist/leaflet.js in your HTML head.
SourceFelt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
Leaflet: What mapping services does Leaflet support?
Leaflet integrates seamlessly with various mapping services including OpenStreetMap, Google Maps, Bing, and other custom tile providers, allowing developers to choose the best base layer.
SourceFelt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
Leaflet: What is the file size of Leaflet?
Leaflet weighs about 42 KB of JavaScript.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs Mapbox
- Felt vs Google Maps Platform
- Felt vs Stadia Maps
- Felt vs HERE Technologies
- Felt vs Apple Maps
- Felt vs OpenLayers
- Felt vs CesiumJS
- Felt vs Mappedin
- Felt vs OSRM
- Felt vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- Felt vs PositionStack
- Felt vs Radar
- Felt vs SAGA GIS
- Leaflet vs Esri ArcGIS
- Leaflet vs CARTO
- Leaflet vs QGIS
- Leaflet vs Atlas.co
- Leaflet vs Global Mapper
- Leaflet vs GRASS GIS
- Leaflet vs onX Maps
- Leaflet vs Ride with GPS
- Leaflet vs SW Maps
- Leaflet vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Leaflet vs Kepler.gl
- Leaflet vs Trailforks
- Leaflet vs AllTrails
- Leaflet vs Bing Maps
- Leaflet vs Cesium ion
- Leaflet vs Citymapper
- Leaflet vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Leaflet vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Leaflet vs Mapbox
- Leaflet vs Google Maps Platform
- Leaflet vs Stadia Maps
- Leaflet vs HERE Technologies
- Leaflet vs Apple Maps
- Leaflet vs OpenLayers
- Leaflet vs CesiumJS
- Leaflet vs Mappedin
- Leaflet vs OSRM
- Leaflet vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- Leaflet vs PositionStack
- Leaflet vs Radar
- Leaflet vs SAGA GIS
