Software · head to head
Fathom vs Mattermost

Mattermost
Software
Channel-centric collaboration for secure workflows
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Fathom has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fathom team plan requires minimum 2 users; cannot purchase single seat at team pricing; Mattermost no prices are published for any of the three paid tiers (Professional, Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced); all require contacting sales
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fathom and Mattermost actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fathom | Mattermost |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams | Web |
| Founded | 2020 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fathom
- Auto-recording
- AI summaries
- Transcription
- Highlight clips
- Zoom
- Google Meet
- HubSpot
- Salesforce
Only in Mattermost
Nothing recorded that Fathom does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fathom
- AI-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionalsnot Mattermost
- Meeting analysis with AI scorecards and action item generation that syncs to CRMsnot Mattermost
Mattermost
No use cases recorded yet. See the Mattermost review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fathom
- Team plan requires minimum 2 users; cannot purchase single seat at team pricing
- CRM field sync and deal view summaries available only on Business plan ($34/user/month) and above
Mattermost
- No prices are published for any of the three paid tiers (Professional, Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced); all require contacting sales
- Professional is capped at a maximum of 250 users, forcing a move to Enterprise for larger teams
- Licenses are sold only as prepaid annual subscriptions, and organizations that exceed their licensed seat count must purchase additional seats on a prorated quarterly basis
Pricing, plan by plan
Fathom
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fathom review.
Mattermost
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Mattermost review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Fathom if
- You need auto-recording.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams.
- You also want ai summaries.
Choose Mattermost if
Nothing in the data separates Mattermost from Fathom on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Fathom or Mattermost better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fathom starts at Free and Mattermost at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fathom or Mattermost?
- Fathom has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Fathom and On request for Mattermost.
- Does Fathom or Mattermost run on more platforms?
- Fathom runs on Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams. Mattermost runs on Web.
- Can I use Fathom for free?
- Yes. Fathom has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Mattermost starts at On request.
- What is Fathom best used for?
- Fathom is most often used for ai-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionals, meeting analysis with ai scorecards and action item generation that syncs to crms. Of those, ai-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionals and meeting analysis with ai scorecards and action item generation that syncs to crms are not what Mattermost is typically brought in for.
- What can Fathom do that Mattermost cannot?
- Fathom covers Auto-recording, AI summaries, Transcription, Highlight clips.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Fathom vs Pika
- Fathom vs Anthropic API
- Fathom vs D-ID
- Fathom vs Stable Diffusion
- Fathom vs AI21 Labs
- Fathom vs ChatGPT
- Fathom vs Copy.ai
- Fathom vs HeyGen
- Fathom vs Jasper
- Fathom vs Leonardo AI
- Fathom vs Murf
- Fathom vs Perplexity
- Fathom vs Pi
- Fathom vs Play.ht
- Fathom vs Replicate
- Fathom vs Replika
- Fathom vs Rytr
- Fathom vs Together AI
- Fathom vs Zoom
- Fathom vs Microsoft Teams
- Fathom vs Loom
- Fathom vs RingCentral Video
- Fathom vs Slack
- Fathom vs Telegram
- Fathom vs Webex by Cisco
- Fathom vs Chanty
- Fathom vs Chatwork
- Fathom vs Flock
- Fathom vs Google Chat
- Fathom vs Grasshopper
- Fathom vs Lark
- Fathom vs Quo
- Fathom vs Rocket.Chat
- Fathom vs Signal
- Fathom vs TeamViewer
- Fathom vs Textline
- Mattermost vs Pika
- Mattermost vs Anthropic API
- Mattermost vs D-ID
- Mattermost vs Stable Diffusion
- Mattermost vs AI21 Labs
- Mattermost vs ChatGPT
- Mattermost vs Copy.ai
- Mattermost vs HeyGen
- Mattermost vs Jasper
- Mattermost vs Leonardo AI
- Mattermost vs Murf
- Mattermost vs Perplexity
- Mattermost vs Pi
- Mattermost vs Play.ht
- Mattermost vs Replicate
- Mattermost vs Replika
- Mattermost vs Rytr
- Mattermost vs Together AI
- Mattermost vs Zoom
- Mattermost vs Microsoft Teams
- Mattermost vs Loom
- Mattermost vs RingCentral Video
- Mattermost vs Slack
- Mattermost vs Telegram
- Mattermost vs Webex by Cisco
- Mattermost vs Chanty
- Mattermost vs Chatwork
- Mattermost vs Flock
- Mattermost vs Google Chat
- Mattermost vs Grasshopper
- Mattermost vs Lark
- Mattermost vs Quo
- Mattermost vs Rocket.Chat
- Mattermost vs Signal
- Mattermost vs TeamViewer
- Mattermost vs Textline

