Communication & Collaboration · head to head
Mattermost vs Rocket.Chat

Mattermost
Communication & Collaboration
Channel-centric collaboration for secure workflows
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Rocket.Chat
Communication & Collaboration
Deployment flexibility and compliance across regulatory frameworks
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Mattermost no prices are published for any of the three paid tiers (Professional, Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced); all require contacting sales; Rocket.Chat no prices, tier names with numbers, or minimum seats are published anywhere on the pricing page; all three paid editions (Commercial, Government, Defense) route to Contact sales or Contact us
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Mattermost and Rocket.Chat actually diverge.
| Attribute | Mattermost | Rocket.Chat |
|---|
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Communication & Collaboration).
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Mattermost
- No prices are published for any of the three paid tiers (Professional, Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced); all require contacting sales
- Professional is capped at a maximum of 250 users, forcing a move to Enterprise for larger teams
- Licenses are sold only as prepaid annual subscriptions, and organizations that exceed their licensed seat count must purchase additional seats on a prorated quarterly basis
Rocket.Chat
- No prices, tier names with numbers, or minimum seats are published anywhere on the pricing page; all three paid editions (Commercial, Government, Defense) route to Contact sales or Contact us
- The free community edition is not represented on the pricing page at all, which lists only the three quote-only enterprise tiers
Pricing, plan by plan
Mattermost
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Mattermost review.
Rocket.Chat
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Rocket.Chat review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Mattermost if
Nothing in the data separates Mattermost from Rocket.Chat on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Rocket.Chat if
Nothing in the data separates Rocket.Chat from Mattermost on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Mattermost or Rocket.Chat better?
- Neither clearly leads. Mattermost starts at On request and Rocket.Chat at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Mattermost or Rocket.Chat?
- Mattermost starts at On request and Rocket.Chat at On request.
- Does Mattermost or Rocket.Chat run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
Related pages
More on Rocket.Chat
Other head to heads
- Mattermost vs Zoom
- Mattermost vs Microsoft Teams
- Mattermost vs Loom
- Mattermost vs RingCentral Video
- Mattermost vs Slack
- Mattermost vs Telegram
- Mattermost vs Webex by Cisco
- Mattermost vs Chanty
- Mattermost vs Chatwork
- Mattermost vs Flock
- Mattermost vs Google Chat
- Mattermost vs Grasshopper
- Mattermost vs Lark
- Mattermost vs Quo
- Mattermost vs Signal
- Mattermost vs TeamViewer
- Mattermost vs Textline
- Rocket.Chat vs Zoom
- Rocket.Chat vs Microsoft Teams
- Rocket.Chat vs Loom
- Rocket.Chat vs RingCentral Video
- Rocket.Chat vs Slack
- Rocket.Chat vs Telegram
- Rocket.Chat vs Webex by Cisco
- Rocket.Chat vs Chanty
- Rocket.Chat vs Chatwork
- Rocket.Chat vs Flock
- Rocket.Chat vs Google Chat
- Rocket.Chat vs Grasshopper
- Rocket.Chat vs Lark
- Rocket.Chat vs Quo
- Rocket.Chat vs Signal
- Rocket.Chat vs TeamViewer
- Rocket.Chat vs Textline
