Software · head to head
Fathom vs TeamViewer

TeamViewer
Software
Remote access and support software from Germany, used for connecting to computers anywhere
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Fathom has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fathom team plan requires minimum 2 users; cannot purchase single seat at team pricing; TeamViewer pricing page gates all figures behind plan selection with no listed price for its Teams and Tensor Enterprise tiers, which are described as a fully customized license requiring sales contact
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fathom and TeamViewer actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fathom | TeamViewer |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams | Web |
| Founded | 2020 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fathom
- Auto-recording
- AI summaries
- Transcription
- Highlight clips
- Zoom
- Google Meet
- HubSpot
- Salesforce
Only in TeamViewer
Nothing recorded that Fathom does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fathom
- AI-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionalsnot TeamViewer
- Meeting analysis with AI scorecards and action item generation that syncs to CRMsnot TeamViewer
TeamViewer
No use cases recorded yet. See the TeamViewer review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fathom
- Team plan requires minimum 2 users; cannot purchase single seat at team pricing
- CRM field sync and deal view summaries available only on Business plan ($34/user/month) and above
TeamViewer
- Pricing page gates all figures behind plan selection with no listed price for its Teams and Tensor Enterprise tiers, which are described as a fully customized license requiring sales contact
- Add-on modules (Asset Management, Endpoint Protection, Device Monitoring, Assist AR Lite, Mobile Device Management) are sold separately from the core license, only offered with a 30-day free trial before charges apply
Pricing, plan by plan
Fathom
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fathom review.
TeamViewer
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the TeamViewer review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Fathom if
- You need auto-recording.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams.
- You also want ai summaries.
Choose TeamViewer if
Nothing in the data separates TeamViewer from Fathom on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Fathom or TeamViewer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fathom starts at Free and TeamViewer at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fathom or TeamViewer?
- Fathom has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Fathom and On request for TeamViewer.
- Does Fathom or TeamViewer run on more platforms?
- Fathom runs on Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams. TeamViewer runs on Web.
- Can I use Fathom for free?
- Yes. Fathom has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. TeamViewer starts at On request.
- What is Fathom best used for?
- Fathom is most often used for ai-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionals, meeting analysis with ai scorecards and action item generation that syncs to crms. Of those, ai-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionals and meeting analysis with ai scorecards and action item generation that syncs to crms are not what TeamViewer is typically brought in for.
- What can Fathom do that TeamViewer cannot?
- Fathom covers Auto-recording, AI summaries, Transcription, Highlight clips.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Fathom vs Pika
- Fathom vs Anthropic API
- Fathom vs D-ID
- Fathom vs Stable Diffusion
- Fathom vs AI21 Labs
- Fathom vs ChatGPT
- Fathom vs Copy.ai
- Fathom vs HeyGen
- Fathom vs Jasper
- Fathom vs Leonardo AI
- Fathom vs Murf
- Fathom vs Perplexity
- Fathom vs Pi
- Fathom vs Play.ht
- Fathom vs Replicate
- Fathom vs Replika
- Fathom vs Rytr
- Fathom vs Together AI
- Fathom vs Zoom
- Fathom vs Microsoft Teams
- Fathom vs Loom
- Fathom vs RingCentral Video
- Fathom vs Slack
- Fathom vs Telegram
- Fathom vs Webex by Cisco
- Fathom vs Chanty
- Fathom vs Chatwork
- Fathom vs Flock
- Fathom vs Google Chat
- Fathom vs Grasshopper
- Fathom vs Lark
- Fathom vs Mattermost
- Fathom vs Quo
- Fathom vs Rocket.Chat
- Fathom vs Signal
- Fathom vs Textline
- TeamViewer vs Pika
- TeamViewer vs Anthropic API
- TeamViewer vs D-ID
- TeamViewer vs Stable Diffusion
- TeamViewer vs AI21 Labs
- TeamViewer vs ChatGPT
- TeamViewer vs Copy.ai
- TeamViewer vs HeyGen
- TeamViewer vs Jasper
- TeamViewer vs Leonardo AI
- TeamViewer vs Murf
- TeamViewer vs Perplexity
- TeamViewer vs Pi
- TeamViewer vs Play.ht
- TeamViewer vs Replicate
- TeamViewer vs Replika
- TeamViewer vs Rytr
- TeamViewer vs Together AI
- TeamViewer vs Zoom
- TeamViewer vs Microsoft Teams
- TeamViewer vs Loom
- TeamViewer vs RingCentral Video
- TeamViewer vs Slack
- TeamViewer vs Telegram
- TeamViewer vs Webex by Cisco
- TeamViewer vs Chanty
- TeamViewer vs Chatwork
- TeamViewer vs Flock
- TeamViewer vs Google Chat
- TeamViewer vs Grasshopper
- TeamViewer vs Lark
- TeamViewer vs Mattermost
- TeamViewer vs Quo
- TeamViewer vs Rocket.Chat
- TeamViewer vs Signal
- TeamViewer vs Textline

