Software · head to head
Fathom vs Grasshopper
The short version
- Only Fathom has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fathom team plan requires minimum 2 users; cannot purchase single seat at team pricing; Grasshopper available only in the USA and Canada; the site returns a not available in your region error outside those countries
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fathom and Grasshopper actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fathom | Grasshopper |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams | Web |
| Founded | 2020 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fathom
- Auto-recording
- AI summaries
- Transcription
- Highlight clips
- Zoom
- Google Meet
- HubSpot
- Salesforce
Only in Grasshopper
Nothing recorded that Fathom does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fathom
- AI-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionalsnot Grasshopper
- Meeting analysis with AI scorecards and action item generation that syncs to CRMsnot Grasshopper
Grasshopper
No use cases recorded yet. See the Grasshopper review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fathom
- Team plan requires minimum 2 users; cannot purchase single seat at team pricing
- CRM field sync and deal view summaries available only on Business plan ($34/user/month) and above
Grasshopper
- Available only in the USA and Canada; the site returns a not available in your region error outside those countries
- Plans start at $14/month only under a promotional discount of up to $75 off select plans, meaning the advertised entry price is not the standing rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Fathom
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fathom review.
Grasshopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Grasshopper review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Fathom if
- You need auto-recording.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams.
- You also want ai summaries.
Choose Grasshopper if
Nothing in the data separates Grasshopper from Fathom on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Fathom or Grasshopper better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fathom starts at Free and Grasshopper at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fathom or Grasshopper?
- Fathom has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Fathom and On request for Grasshopper.
- Does Fathom or Grasshopper run on more platforms?
- Fathom runs on Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams. Grasshopper runs on Web.
- Can I use Fathom for free?
- Yes. Fathom has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Grasshopper starts at On request.
- What is Fathom best used for?
- Fathom is most often used for ai-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionals, meeting analysis with ai scorecards and action item generation that syncs to crms. Of those, ai-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionals and meeting analysis with ai scorecards and action item generation that syncs to crms are not what Grasshopper is typically brought in for.
- What can Fathom do that Grasshopper cannot?
- Fathom covers Auto-recording, AI summaries, Transcription, Highlight clips.
Related pages
More on Grasshopper
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Fathom vs Pika
- Fathom vs Anthropic API
- Fathom vs D-ID
- Fathom vs Stable Diffusion
- Fathom vs AI21 Labs
- Fathom vs ChatGPT
- Fathom vs Copy.ai
- Fathom vs HeyGen
- Fathom vs Jasper
- Fathom vs Leonardo AI
- Fathom vs Murf
- Fathom vs Perplexity
- Fathom vs Pi
- Fathom vs Play.ht
- Fathom vs Replicate
- Fathom vs Replika
- Fathom vs Rytr
- Fathom vs Together AI
- Fathom vs Zoom
- Fathom vs Microsoft Teams
- Fathom vs Loom
- Fathom vs RingCentral Video
- Fathom vs Slack
- Fathom vs Telegram
- Fathom vs Webex by Cisco
- Fathom vs Chanty
- Fathom vs Chatwork
- Fathom vs Flock
- Fathom vs Google Chat
- Fathom vs Lark
- Fathom vs Mattermost
- Fathom vs Quo
- Fathom vs Rocket.Chat
- Fathom vs Signal
- Fathom vs TeamViewer
- Fathom vs Textline
- Grasshopper vs Pika
- Grasshopper vs Anthropic API
- Grasshopper vs D-ID
- Grasshopper vs Stable Diffusion
- Grasshopper vs AI21 Labs
- Grasshopper vs ChatGPT
- Grasshopper vs Copy.ai
- Grasshopper vs HeyGen
- Grasshopper vs Jasper
- Grasshopper vs Leonardo AI
- Grasshopper vs Murf
- Grasshopper vs Perplexity
- Grasshopper vs Pi
- Grasshopper vs Play.ht
- Grasshopper vs Replicate
- Grasshopper vs Replika
- Grasshopper vs Rytr
- Grasshopper vs Together AI
- Grasshopper vs Zoom
- Grasshopper vs Microsoft Teams
- Grasshopper vs Loom
- Grasshopper vs RingCentral Video
- Grasshopper vs Slack
- Grasshopper vs Telegram
- Grasshopper vs Webex by Cisco
- Grasshopper vs Chanty
- Grasshopper vs Chatwork
- Grasshopper vs Flock
- Grasshopper vs Google Chat
- Grasshopper vs Lark
- Grasshopper vs Mattermost
- Grasshopper vs Quo
- Grasshopper vs Rocket.Chat
- Grasshopper vs Signal
- Grasshopper vs TeamViewer
- Grasshopper vs Textline


