Softwr

Nonprofits · head to head

EveryAction vs Fluxx

EveryAction logo

EveryAction

Nonprofits

Integrated CRM and digital marketing for nonprofits

From
On request
Rated
-
Fluxx logo

Fluxx

Nonprofits

Configurable grants management for foundations that run complex, multi-stage funding programmes

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: EveryAction now sold as part of Bonterra rather than as EveryAction; everyaction.com redirects to bonterratech.com; Fluxx configuration flexibility means the system does very little until someone configures it, and foundations without a dedicated systems administrator end up paying the vendor or a partner for every change.
  • They diverge on capability: EveryAction covers Donor management, Fluxx covers Configurable data model.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which EveryAction and Fluxx actually diverge.

Attributes where EveryAction and Fluxx differ
AttributeEveryActionFluxx
Pricing modelsubscriptionquote
PlatformsWeb, Mobile-responsiveWeb
Founded2007Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Nonprofits).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in EveryAction

  • Donor management
  • Email campaigns
  • Digital marketing
  • Multi-channel engagement
  • Reporting
  • Stripe
  • PayPal
  • Salesforce

Only in Fluxx

  • Configurable data model
  • Card-based interface
  • Multi-programme workflows
  • Board and committee review
  • Payment scheduling
  • Applicant portal

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

EveryAction

  • Business operationsnot Fluxx
  • Productivitynot Fluxx
  • Automationnot Fluxx

Fluxx

  • A foundation running six distinct funding programmes that each need their own application form, review panel and payment schedulenot EveryAction
  • A regranting intermediary administering funds for multiple donors who each require separate reportingnot EveryAction
  • A public agency distributing grant funds with statutory eligibility rules that must be enforced before an application can be submittednot EveryAction
  • A funder moving off spreadsheets and email after grant volume made manual board packet preparation unworkablenot EveryAction

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

EveryAction

  • Now sold as part of Bonterra rather than as EveryAction; everyaction.com redirects to bonterratech.com
  • Pricing is not published

Fluxx

  • Configuration flexibility means the system does very little until someone configures it, and foundations without a dedicated systems administrator end up paying the vendor or a partner for every change.
  • Implementation commonly runs four to eight months and is priced separately from the subscription, so first-year cost is far above the annual licence figure.
  • No pricing is published and quotes scale with assets under management, which means two foundations making the same number of grants can be quoted very differently.
  • The card-based interface is unfamiliar to new users and reviewer adoption suffers without training, which matters because trustees use it a few times a year and forget between meetings.
  • Reporting is capable but the report builder is technical, and many foundations end up exporting to a spreadsheet or a BI tool for board-ready output.

Pricing, plan by plan

EveryAction

On request
  • Professional$90/month
    • Donor management
    • Email campaigns
  • EnterpriseFree
    • Advanced integrations
    • Custom reporting
    • Dedicated support

Fluxx

On request
  • Fluxx Grantmaker$undefined/year
    • Configurable grantmaking workflows
    • Applicant portal and reviewer access
    • Priced by assets under management and grant volume
  • Fluxx Grantseeker$undefined/year
    • Free portal for applicants submitting to Fluxx funders
    • Tracks submissions and requirements across funders

Which should you pick?

Choose EveryAction if

  • You need donor management.
  • You work on Web, Mobile-responsive.
  • You also want email campaigns.

Choose Fluxx if

  • You need configurable data model.
  • You also want card-based interface.

Questions people ask

Is EveryAction or Fluxx better?
Neither clearly leads. EveryAction starts at On request and Fluxx at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, EveryAction or Fluxx?
EveryAction starts at On request and Fluxx at On request.
Does EveryAction or Fluxx run on more platforms?
EveryAction runs on Web, Mobile-responsive. Fluxx runs on Web.
What is EveryAction best used for?
EveryAction is most often used for business operations, productivity, automation. Of those, business operations and productivity are not what Fluxx is typically brought in for.
What can EveryAction do that Fluxx cannot?
EveryAction covers Donor management, Email campaigns, Digital marketing, Multi-channel engagement. Fluxx covers Configurable data model, Card-based interface, Multi-programme workflows, Board and committee review.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Fluxx: Is Fluxx Grantseeker really free?

Yes, for applicants. It is the submission portal, and funders pay for Grantmaker.

Fluxx: How is Fluxx priced?

By quote, scaling with assets under management and grant volume. Implementation is a separate professional services fee.

Fluxx: Can we configure Fluxx ourselves?

Yes, that is the point of it. But it requires a trained internal administrator; foundations that do not appoint one become dependent on paid services.

Fluxx: How long does implementation take?

Typically four to eight months for a multi-programme funder, driven mostly by how long the foundation takes to agree its own process.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads