Nonprofits · head to head
Constant Contact vs Fluxx

Fluxx
Nonprofits
Configurable grants management for foundations that run complex, multi-stage funding programmes
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Constant Contact has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Constant Contact core plan started at $9.99 per month and Plus plan at $45 per month, both scaling by contact list size rather than a flat rate (Internet Archive capture, 2022); Fluxx configuration flexibility means the system does very little until someone configures it, and foundations without a dedicated systems administrator end up paying the vendor or a partner for every change.
- They diverge on capability: Constant Contact covers Email marketing, Fluxx covers Configurable data model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Constant Contact and Fluxx actually diverge.
| Attribute | Constant Contact | Fluxx |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Mobile-responsive | Web |
| Founded | 1995 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Nonprofits).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Constant Contact
- Email marketing
- Event management
- Contact management
- Automation
- Analytics
- Salesforce
- Zapier
- Google Analytics
Only in Fluxx
- Configurable data model
- Card-based interface
- Multi-programme workflows
- Board and committee review
- Payment scheduling
- Applicant portal
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Constant Contact
- Business operationsnot Fluxx
- Productivitynot Fluxx
- Automationnot Fluxx
Fluxx
- A foundation running six distinct funding programmes that each need their own application form, review panel and payment schedulenot Constant Contact
- A regranting intermediary administering funds for multiple donors who each require separate reportingnot Constant Contact
- A public agency distributing grant funds with statutory eligibility rules that must be enforced before an application can be submittednot Constant Contact
- A funder moving off spreadsheets and email after grant volume made manual board packet preparation unworkablenot Constant Contact
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Constant Contact
- Core plan started at $9.99 per month and Plus plan at $45 per month, both scaling by contact list size rather than a flat rate (Internet Archive capture, 2022)
Fluxx
- Configuration flexibility means the system does very little until someone configures it, and foundations without a dedicated systems administrator end up paying the vendor or a partner for every change.
- Implementation commonly runs four to eight months and is priced separately from the subscription, so first-year cost is far above the annual licence figure.
- No pricing is published and quotes scale with assets under management, which means two foundations making the same number of grants can be quoted very differently.
- The card-based interface is unfamiliar to new users and reviewer adoption suffers without training, which matters because trustees use it a few times a year and forget between meetings.
- Reporting is capable but the report builder is technical, and many foundations end up exporting to a spreadsheet or a BI tool for board-ready output.
Pricing, plan by plan
Constant Contact
Free- FreeFree
- Basic email marketing
- Contacts up to 100
- Plus$45/month
- Advanced features
- Event management
- Automation
Fluxx
On request- Fluxx Grantmaker$undefined/year
- Configurable grantmaking workflows
- Applicant portal and reviewer access
- Priced by assets under management and grant volume
- Fluxx Grantseeker$undefined/year
- Free portal for applicants submitting to Fluxx funders
- Tracks submissions and requirements across funders
Which should you pick?
Choose Constant Contact if
- You need email marketing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Mobile-responsive.
- You also want event management.
Questions people ask
- Is Constant Contact or Fluxx better?
- Neither clearly leads. Constant Contact starts at Free and Fluxx at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Constant Contact or Fluxx?
- Constant Contact has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Constant Contact and On request for Fluxx.
- Does Constant Contact or Fluxx run on more platforms?
- Constant Contact runs on Web, Mobile-responsive. Fluxx runs on Web.
- Can I use Constant Contact for free?
- Yes. Constant Contact has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Fluxx starts at On request.
- What is Constant Contact best used for?
- Constant Contact is most often used for business operations, productivity, automation. Of those, business operations and productivity are not what Fluxx is typically brought in for.
- What can Constant Contact do that Fluxx cannot?
- Constant Contact covers Email marketing, Event management, Contact management, Automation. Fluxx covers Configurable data model, Card-based interface, Multi-programme workflows, Board and committee review.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fluxx: Is Fluxx Grantseeker really free?
Yes, for applicants. It is the submission portal, and funders pay for Grantmaker.
Fluxx: How is Fluxx priced?
By quote, scaling with assets under management and grant volume. Implementation is a separate professional services fee.
Fluxx: Can we configure Fluxx ourselves?
Yes, that is the point of it. But it requires a trained internal administrator; foundations that do not appoint one become dependent on paid services.
Fluxx: How long does implementation take?
Typically four to eight months for a multi-programme funder, driven mostly by how long the foundation takes to agree its own process.
Related pages
More on Constant Contact
Other head to heads
- Constant Contact vs Salsa CRM
- Constant Contact vs Bloomerang
- Constant Contact vs EveryAction
- Constant Contact vs Virtuous
- Constant Contact vs Galaxy Digital
- Constant Contact vs Little Green Light
- Constant Contact vs NeonCRM
- Constant Contact vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Constant Contact vs InitLive
- Constant Contact vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Constant Contact vs DonorPerfect
- Constant Contact vs SignUpGenius
- Constant Contact vs Instrumentl
- Constant Contact vs OneCause
- Constant Contact vs Qgiv
- Constant Contact vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Constant Contact vs Aplos
- Constant Contact vs GuideStar
- Constant Contact vs Foundant Technologies
- Constant Contact vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
- Constant Contact vs Submittable
- Constant Contact vs Bonterra
- Constant Contact vs OpenGrants
- Constant Contact vs Raisely
- Constant Contact vs QuickBooks for Nonprofits
- Constant Contact vs Sumac
- Constant Contact vs TechSoup
- Constant Contact vs Tendenci
- Fluxx vs Salsa CRM
- Fluxx vs Bloomerang
- Fluxx vs EveryAction
- Fluxx vs Virtuous
- Fluxx vs Galaxy Digital
- Fluxx vs Little Green Light
- Fluxx vs NeonCRM
- Fluxx vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Fluxx vs InitLive
- Fluxx vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Fluxx vs DonorPerfect
- Fluxx vs SignUpGenius
- Fluxx vs Instrumentl
- Fluxx vs OneCause
- Fluxx vs Qgiv
- Fluxx vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Fluxx vs Aplos
- Fluxx vs GuideStar
- Fluxx vs Foundant Technologies
- Fluxx vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
- Fluxx vs Submittable
- Fluxx vs Bonterra
- Fluxx vs OpenGrants
- Fluxx vs Raisely
- Fluxx vs QuickBooks for Nonprofits
- Fluxx vs Sumac
- Fluxx vs TechSoup
- Fluxx vs Tendenci

