Fluxxvs
GuideStar


GuideStar: If you need funder and nonprofit data rather than a grantmaking workflow system

Configurable grants management for foundations that run complex, multi-stage funding programmes
As of 31 August 2026, Fluxx's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. Grantmaking software for large foundations and government funders, built as a configurable data model rather than a fixed workflow. Softwr lists it under Nonprofits. Fluxx is made by Fluxx Labs, Inc., available on Web.
Overview
Fluxx Grantmaker is a cloud grants management system used by private foundations, community foundations, corporate funders and public agencies. It handles the full grantmaking cycle: eligibility screening, letters of inquiry, full applications, board review, payment scheduling, requirements and reporting, and outcome data. A companion product, Fluxx Grantseeker, is the free portal that applicants use to submit to any Fluxx funder. What separates Fluxx from simpler grants tools is that it exposes its data model. Cards, themes, workflows and user roles are all configurable, and organisations can add objects and fields without vendor development work. For a funder with several distinct programmes, each with its own application form, review committee and payment schedule, this is the difference between one system and three. The commercial consequence is that Fluxx sells to funders with staff who can own the configuration, and it does badly with small foundations who expect it to work out of the box. Buyers are typically foundations making hundreds to thousands of grants a year, or intermediaries regranting on behalf of multiple funders. Pricing is quote-only and scales with assets under management and grant volume, and implementation is a separate professional services engagement usually run by Fluxx or a certified partner. The trade-off is real: you get a system that can model almost any funding process, at the cost of needing someone whose job is to maintain it.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Fluxx.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


GuideStar: If you need funder and nonprofit data rather than a grantmaking workflow system


Salesforce for Nonprofits: A configurable alternative if you already run Salesforce and can build the grants layer
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Fluxx Grantmaker
On request
Fluxx Grantseeker
On request
Capabilities
Configurable data model
Add objects, fields and relationships without vendor code changes
Card-based interface
Records rendered as configurable cards and themes per user role
Multi-programme workflows
Distinct application, review and payment flows per funding programme
Board and committee review
Scoring, panel assignment and packet generation for trustee meetings
Payment scheduling
Multi-year and tranche payments with requirement gating before release
Applicant portal
Grantseeker portal shared across all Fluxx funders so applicants reuse one login
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Yes, for applicants. It is the submission portal, and funders pay for Grantmaker.
By quote, scaling with assets under management and grant volume. Implementation is a separate professional services fee.
Yes, that is the point of it. But it requires a trained internal administrator; foundations that do not appoint one become dependent on paid services.
Typically four to eight months for a multi-programme funder, driven mostly by how long the foundation takes to agree its own process.
Keep looking
Grant lifecycle management for foundations, with public subscription bands and a two-year term
Grants management for foundations and corporate givers inside the Blackbaud ecosystem
Configurable grants, research and case management platform for large funders
Application, review and grant management for funders running open calls at volume
The rolled-up parent of EveryAction, Apricot, CyberGrants and Network for Good, sold as three product lines
Fund accounting for nonprofits and churches, with donor management and online giving attached
Low-cost grant search across federal, state and private funders, with a paid consultant marketplace alongside
Peer to peer and campaign fundraising platform funded by optional donor tips rather than a platform fee
Modular nonprofit CRM that pairs donor management with client case management
Peer to peer and campaign fundraising platform funded by optional donor tips rather than a platform fee
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Fluxx, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Offline-first case management and mobile data collection for frontline health and development programmes
Per month by mobile user countThe rolled-up parent of EveryAction, Apricot, CyberGrants and Network for Good, sold as three product lines
quoteGrants management for foundations and corporate givers inside the Blackbaud ecosystem
quoteOpen-source association management system for nonprofits
Open source, with paid hosting availableNonprofit CRM with its own in-house payment processing rather than a third-party gateway
quoteFunder and nonprofit data subscriptions from the organisation formed by Foundation Center and GuideStar
Per user per month by tier