Fleet Management · head to head
Quartix vs Webfleet

Quartix
Fleet Management
Deliberately narrow vehicle tracking from a listed UK vendor that publishes its prices
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Webfleet
Fleet Management
European fleet telematics, owned by Bridgestone since the TomTom Telematics sale
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Quartix video telematics is not part of the core product, so any fleet that decides it needs camera evidence after an incident has to bring in a second vendor and a second subscription.; Webfleet ownership sits with a tyre manufacturer, so product investment follows the tyre and vehicle services strategy, and features that do not feed that business have historically moved slowly.
- They diverge on capability: Quartix covers Live tracking, Webfleet covers Tachograph management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Quartix and Webfleet actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Fleet Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Quartix
- Live tracking
- Driving style scoring
- Timesheet reporting
- Geofences
- Driver identification
- Published pricing
Only in Webfleet
- Tachograph management
- OptiDrive 360
- LINK devices
- PRO driver terminals
- Tyre and vehicle data
- Video telematics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Quartix
- A UK or French van fleet that wants tracking and timesheet evidence without a discovery call and a three-year commitmentnot Webfleet
- A finance manager who needs to compare telematics costs on published numbers rather than negotiated quotesnot Webfleet
- An operator disputing employee hours or customer claims about arrival times who needs a defensible site attendance recordnot Webfleet
- A small fleet whose insurer offers a discount for driving style monitoring but who does not need cameras or compliance toolingnot Webfleet
Webfleet
- A haulage operator running heavy goods vehicles across EU borders that must download tachograph data remotely and prove driving-time compliancenot Quartix
- A European van fleet that wants driver coaching and fuel reporting without buying an American platform with unused compliance modulesnot Quartix
- An organisation already buying Bridgestone tyres and maintenance that can fold telematics into an existing service contractnot Quartix
- Fleets that want in-cab navigation and job dispatch on a dedicated driver terminal rather than a phone appnot Quartix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Quartix
- Video telematics is not part of the core product, so any fleet that decides it needs camera evidence after an incident has to bring in a second vendor and a second subscription.
- There is no maintenance, work order or parts management, so servicing schedules stay in whatever spreadsheet or garage system the fleet already runs.
- US hours of service and wider DOT compliance are not the focus, which rules Quartix out for regulated interstate commercial operations.
- The standard tracker is hardwired rather than a plug-in device, so installation means booking vehicles in, which adds cost and downtime that no-contract plug-in competitors avoid.
- The API and integration list are short, so feeding tracking data into payroll, job costing or an ERP tends to mean scheduled exports rather than a supported connector.
Webfleet
- Ownership sits with a tyre manufacturer, so product investment follows the tyre and vehicle services strategy, and features that do not feed that business have historically moved slowly.
- North American coverage is thin next to the European operation, with a smaller partner network and an hours of service product that is not competitive with purpose-built ELD vendors.
- Useful compliance capability sits in add-on tiers, so remote tachograph download and advanced reporting push the real per vehicle cost well above the entry quote.
- The camera line arrived later than the market and offers less on-device detection and less coaching workflow than Lytx or Samsara, so safety-driven buyers often end up running a second system.
- Contracts are hardware-led and usually multi-year, so replacing Webfleet means either running out the term or writing off installed devices that have no resale value.
Pricing, plan by plan
Quartix
On request- Quartix$undefined/month
- List pricing published openly, with rates varying by contract length
- Tracking hardware included in the subscription rather than bought separately
- One-year terms available alongside longer discounted options
Webfleet
On request- Webfleet$undefined/year
- Per vehicle subscription in feature tiers
- Hardware bought outright or amortised over the term
- Tachograph and remote download sold as add-ons
Which should you pick?
Choose Quartix if
- You need live tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want driving style scoring.
Choose Webfleet if
- You need tachograph management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want optidrive 360.
Questions people ask
- Is Quartix or Webfleet better?
- Neither clearly leads. Quartix starts at On request and Webfleet at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Quartix or Webfleet?
- Quartix starts at On request and Webfleet at On request.
- Does Quartix or Webfleet run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Quartix best used for?
- Quartix is most often used for a uk or french van fleet that wants tracking and timesheet evidence without a discovery call and a three-year commitment, a finance manager who needs to compare telematics costs on published numbers rather than negotiated quotes, an operator disputing employee hours or customer claims about arrival times who needs a defensible site attendance record, a small fleet whose insurer offers a discount for driving style monitoring but who does not need cameras or compliance tooling. Of those, a uk or french van fleet that wants tracking and timesheet evidence without a discovery call and a three-year commitment and a finance manager who needs to compare telematics costs on published numbers rather than negotiated quotes are not what Webfleet is typically brought in for.
- What can Quartix do that Webfleet cannot?
- Quartix covers Live tracking, Driving style scoring, Timesheet reporting, Geofences. Webfleet covers Tachograph management, OptiDrive 360, LINK devices, PRO driver terminals.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Quartix: Why is Quartix cheaper than the big platforms?
Because it does less. There is no camera ecosystem, no compliance suite and no marketplace to fund. If you only need tracking, you are not subsidising features you will not use.
Webfleet: Is Webfleet still connected to TomTom?
No. TomTom sold the telematics business to Bridgestone in 2019. There is still navigation and mapping heritage in the driver terminals, but the owner and the strategy are Bridgestone.
Quartix: Do I have to sign for three years?
No. Shorter terms are offered, priced higher per month than the longer options. The rates are published, so the trade-off is visible before you talk to anyone.
Webfleet: Can it handle US ELD requirements?
There is an offering, but it is not the strength of the platform. A fleet whose main problem is US hours of service compliance should look at vendors built around that mandate.
Quartix: Is the hardware mine?
The tracking unit is supplied as part of the subscription rather than sold to you. Check the return and replacement terms if you plan to leave or dispose of vehicles.
Webfleet: Do I have to buy Bridgestone tyres to use it?
No. The tyre services integration is optional. It is worth pricing as a bundle if you already buy from Bridgestone, because that is where the discounting sits.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Quartix vs Geotab
- Quartix vs Verizon Connect
- Quartix vs Azuga
- Quartix vs CalAmp
- Quartix vs GPS Trackit
- Quartix vs NexTraq
- Quartix vs Motive
- Quartix vs Lytx
- Quartix vs Whip Around
- Quartix vs Zonar Systems
- Quartix vs Samsara
- Quartix vs Omnitracs
- Quartix vs Ridecell
- Quartix vs Uptake
- Quartix vs Teletrac Navman
- Quartix vs Fleet Complete
- Quartix vs AssetWorks
- Quartix vs Chevin FleetWave
- Webfleet vs Geotab
- Webfleet vs Verizon Connect
- Webfleet vs Azuga
- Webfleet vs CalAmp
- Webfleet vs GPS Trackit
- Webfleet vs NexTraq
- Webfleet vs Motive
- Webfleet vs Lytx
- Webfleet vs Whip Around
- Webfleet vs Zonar Systems
- Webfleet vs Samsara
- Webfleet vs Omnitracs
- Webfleet vs Ridecell
- Webfleet vs Uptake
- Webfleet vs Teletrac Navman
- Webfleet vs Fleet Complete
- Webfleet vs AssetWorks
- Webfleet vs Chevin FleetWave
