Softwr

Sales Enablement · head to head

Endgame vs Regie.ai

Endgame logo

Endgame

Sales Enablement

A context graph over CRM, calls and documents that answers account questions with citations

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Regie.ai logo

Regie.ai

Sales Enablement

AI sales agents that research, write and send outbound, with published per-seat pricing

From
$180/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Endgame there is no pricing page at all; the URL returns a 404, so every engagement is a sales-led negotiation with no public benchmark and no way to scope budget before committing time.; Regie.ai the seat minimums invert the pricing logic: AI SEP at 180 US dollars requires ten seats while Force Multiplier at 499 requires five, so a small team is pushed to the expensive tier or excluded entirely.
  • They diverge on capability: Endgame covers Context graph, Regie.ai covers AI sales agents.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Endgame and Regie.ai actually diverge.

Attributes where Endgame and Regie.ai differ
AttributeEndgameRegie.ai
Starting priceOn request$180/month
Pricing modelquotePer user per month
PlatformsWebWeb, Chrome extension

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Sales Enablement).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Endgame

  • Context graph
  • Cited answers
  • Account research briefs
  • Meeting and call prep
  • Deal inspection
  • Stakeholder mapping
  • Executive and QBR briefings
  • MCP server

Only in Regie.ai

  • AI sales agents
  • Sequences
  • AI content generation
  • Power and parallel dialler
  • Enrichment
  • Mailbox management
  • Human-in-the-loop review
  • CRM integration

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Endgame

  • An enterprise sales team on Salesforce and Gong whose account research is done manually before every meeting and takes an hour a rep a day.not Regie.ai
  • A revenue organisation that has standardised on Claude or ChatGPT internally and wants those assistants grounded in real CRM and call data instead of hallucinating account history.not Regie.ai
  • A sales leadership team preparing quarterly business reviews from data spread across Salesforce, Snowflake, Gong and Notion.not Regie.ai
  • A new account executive inheriting a territory who needs the history of thirty accounts, including who was involved and what was promised, without reading two years of call recordings.not Regie.ai

Regie.ai

  • A sales team asked to double outbound coverage without adding SDR headcount, using agents to work the long tail of accounts nobody currently touchesnot Endgame
  • A company with a large dormant contact database that needs systematic re-engagement rather than a one-off campaignnot Endgame
  • A revenue leader who wants outbound messaging to stay on brand across a team where message quality currently varies by repnot Endgame
  • A team consolidating a sequencer, a dialler and an AI writing tool into one contract to reduce vendor countnot Endgame

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Endgame

  • There is no pricing page at all; the URL returns a 404, so every engagement is a sales-led negotiation with no public benchmark and no way to scope budget before committing time.
  • The product has pivoted twice, from product-led sales signals to account intelligence to a GTM context graph, on a Series B raised in February 2022 with no publicly reported round since, which is real roadmap and data model risk on a multi-year contract.
  • Value depends heavily on Salesforce and Gong depth, so organisations on HubSpot or a different call recorder get a substantially thinner graph and a weaker product for the same negotiation.
  • Positioning as a context layer under other AI tools makes return on investment hard to attribute, because no user logs in and no workflow visibly belongs to it, which makes renewal conversations difficult to defend internally.
  • Vendor-published performance claims around accuracy, speed and cost reduction have no third-party benchmark behind them, and the independent review profile has been effectively inactive for over a year, so there is no current corpus to validate against.
  • As a layer rather than an application it is structurally exposed to Salesforce or Gong shipping equivalent native context, which would remove the reason to keep paying for it without any action on the vendor’s part.

Regie.ai

  • The seat minimums invert the pricing logic: AI SEP at 180 US dollars requires ten seats while Force Multiplier at 499 requires five, so a small team is pushed to the expensive tier or excluded entirely.
  • Autonomous agents amplify whatever list quality you feed them, and a poorly segmented database produces high-volume irrelevant outbound that damages your sending domain reputation rather than the vendor.
  • Contact and account allocations on Force Multiplier are capped at 1,000 accounts and 4,000 contacts per seat, so a team working a large territory hits an overage conversation partway through the contract year.
  • It occupies the same ground as established sales engagement platforms while being much younger, so integrations and admin controls are thinner than teams migrating from Outreach or Salesloft expect.
  • Agent-written messaging still needs human review to avoid errors that reach prospects, which means the headcount saving is smaller than the pitch implies once someone is assigned to check the output.

Pricing, plan by plan

Endgame

On request
  • Endgame$undefined/year
    • Context graph across CRM, calls, documents and email
    • Slack, Teams, web and CLI access
    • MCP server for external assistants

Regie.ai

$180/month
  • AI SEP$180/month
    • 10 seat minimum
    • Sequences and cadences
    • Intent-based prioritisation
  • Force Multiplier Rep$499/month
    • 5 seat minimum
    • Everything in AI SEP
    • Autonomous outbound agents
  • AI Parallel Dialler add-on$150/month
    • Per user, on top of a base plan
    • Parallel dialling
    • 1,800 per user per year

Which should you pick?

Choose Endgame if

  • You need context graph.
  • You also want cited answers.
Endgame review

Choose Regie.ai if

  • You need ai sales agents.
  • You work on Web, Chrome extension.
  • You also want sequences.
Regie.ai review

Questions people ask

Is Endgame or Regie.ai better?
Neither clearly leads. Endgame starts at On request and Regie.ai at $180/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Endgame or Regie.ai?
Endgame starts at On request and Regie.ai at $180/month.
Does Endgame or Regie.ai run on more platforms?
Endgame runs on Web. Regie.ai runs on Web, Chrome extension.
What is Endgame best used for?
Endgame is most often used for an enterprise sales team on salesforce and gong whose account research is done manually before every meeting and takes an hour a rep a day., a revenue organisation that has standardised on claude or chatgpt internally and wants those assistants grounded in real crm and call data instead of hallucinating account history., a sales leadership team preparing quarterly business reviews from data spread across salesforce, snowflake, gong and notion., a new account executive inheriting a territory who needs the history of thirty accounts, including who was involved and what was promised, without reading two years of call recordings.. Of those, an enterprise sales team on salesforce and gong whose account research is done manually before every meeting and takes an hour a rep a day. and a revenue organisation that has standardised on claude or chatgpt internally and wants those assistants grounded in real crm and call data instead of hallucinating account history. are not what Regie.ai is typically brought in for.
What can Endgame do that Regie.ai cannot?
Endgame covers Context graph, Cited answers, Account research briefs, Meeting and call prep. Regie.ai covers AI sales agents, Sequences, AI content generation, Power and parallel dialler.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Endgame: Is this the Endgame that Elastic acquired?

No. That was an endpoint security company. This is Endgame, Inc. at endgame.io, an account intelligence and context platform for revenue teams.

Regie.ai: What is the minimum I can spend?

1,800 US dollars a month for AI SEP at its ten-seat minimum, or 2,495 a month for Force Multiplier at its five-seat minimum, both on annual terms.

Endgame: Is it still the product-led sales signals tool?

No. It pivoted twice. If your shortlist came from 2021 to 2023 coverage of PQL scoring, the product you would buy today is different.

Regie.ai: Does it replace SDRs?

It replaces some of the volume work, not the judgement. Teams still assign someone to review agent output, which reduces but does not eliminate the headcount argument.

Endgame: What does it cost?

Unpublished. There is no pricing page. Expect an enterprise annual contract negotiated per deal.

Regie.ai: Does it replace Outreach or Salesloft?

It is sold as a replacement and covers sequencing and dialling, but admin depth and integration breadth are narrower than the incumbents.

Endgame: Do I need Salesforce and Gong?

Not strictly, but the graph is built around them. On HubSpot or with another call recorder you get materially less value for the same price.

Regie.ai: Are contacts included?

Force Multiplier includes 1,000 accounts and 4,000 contacts per seat with custom enrichment. Beyond that you are into an overage discussion.

Share

Related pages

More on Endgame

More on Regie.ai

Keep looking

Other head to heads