Softwr

Sales Enablement · head to head

Default vs Regie.ai

Default logo

Default

Sales Enablement

Inbound lead routing, enrichment and scheduling in one workflow layer

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Regie.ai logo

Regie.ai

Sales Enablement

AI sales agents that research, write and send outbound, with published per-seat pricing

From
$180/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Default pricing is not published and the reported structure is a monthly platform fee before any seats, so a small team pays a meaningful minimum regardless of volume and the tool only makes economic sense at some scale.; Regie.ai the seat minimums invert the pricing logic: AI SEP at 180 US dollars requires ten seats while Force Multiplier at 499 requires five, so a small team is pushed to the expensive tier or excluded entirely.
  • They diverge on capability: Default covers Inbound routing, Regie.ai covers AI sales agents.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Default and Regie.ai actually diverge.

Attributes where Default and Regie.ai differ
AttributeDefaultRegie.ai
Starting priceOn request$180/month
Pricing modelquotePer user per month
PlatformsWebWeb, Chrome extension

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Sales Enablement).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Default

  • Inbound routing
  • Native scheduling
  • Waterfall enrichment
  • Lead scoring
  • CRM hygiene
  • Outbound signals
  • MCP endpoint

Only in Regie.ai

  • AI sales agents
  • Sequences
  • AI content generation
  • Power and parallel dialler
  • Enrichment
  • Mailbox management
  • Human-in-the-loop review
  • CRM integration

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Default

  • A B2B software company losing inbound leads between form submission and a booked meeting because routing and scheduling are separate toolsnot Regie.ai
  • A revenue operations team consolidating a scheduler, a routing tool, an enrichment vendor and an automation layer into one contractnot Regie.ai
  • A sales organisation with complex territory rules that needs routing decisions to be auditable when a representative disputes an assignmentnot Regie.ai
  • A team that wants enrichment and ideal customer profile scoring applied before a lead reaches a representative, rather than cleaned up afterwardsnot Regie.ai

Regie.ai

  • A sales team asked to double outbound coverage without adding SDR headcount, using agents to work the long tail of accounts nobody currently touchesnot Default
  • A company with a large dormant contact database that needs systematic re-engagement rather than a one-off campaignnot Default
  • A revenue leader who wants outbound messaging to stay on brand across a team where message quality currently varies by repnot Default
  • A team consolidating a sequencer, a dialler and an AI writing tool into one contract to reduce vendor countnot Default

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Default

  • Pricing is not published and the reported structure is a monthly platform fee before any seats, so a small team pays a meaningful minimum regardless of volume and the tool only makes economic sense at some scale.
  • Seats are split into user seats and routing seats at different prices, which makes headcount planning awkward and means an organisation can be surprised by which roles turn out to need the expensive kind.
  • Enrichment is credit metered, so cost rises with inbound volume exactly when the business is doing well, and a spike in form fills is also a spike in the bill.
  • Consolidating routing, enrichment, scoring and scheduling into one vendor puts a single point of failure between a demo request and a sales representative, which is the highest value path in the business.
  • The vendor offers budget to buy out incumbent contracts, which is effective marketing but tells you switching costs in this category are high in both directions, including out of Default later.

Regie.ai

  • The seat minimums invert the pricing logic: AI SEP at 180 US dollars requires ten seats while Force Multiplier at 499 requires five, so a small team is pushed to the expensive tier or excluded entirely.
  • Autonomous agents amplify whatever list quality you feed them, and a poorly segmented database produces high-volume irrelevant outbound that damages your sending domain reputation rather than the vendor.
  • Contact and account allocations on Force Multiplier are capped at 1,000 accounts and 4,000 contacts per seat, so a team working a large territory hits an overage conversation partway through the contract year.
  • It occupies the same ground as established sales engagement platforms while being much younger, so integrations and admin controls are thinner than teams migrating from Outreach or Salesloft expect.
  • Agent-written messaging still needs human review to avoid errors that reach prospects, which means the headcount saving is smaller than the pitch implies once someone is assigned to check the output.

Pricing, plan by plan

Default

On request
  • Default$undefined/month
    • Nothing published, quoted through a demo
    • Third party accounts describe a monthly platform fee before any seats are added
    • Separate user seats and routing seats rather than one seat type

Regie.ai

$180/month
  • AI SEP$180/month
    • 10 seat minimum
    • Sequences and cadences
    • Intent-based prioritisation
  • Force Multiplier Rep$499/month
    • 5 seat minimum
    • Everything in AI SEP
    • Autonomous outbound agents
  • AI Parallel Dialler add-on$150/month
    • Per user, on top of a base plan
    • Parallel dialling
    • 1,800 per user per year

Which should you pick?

Choose Default if

  • You need inbound routing.
  • You also want native scheduling.
Default review

Choose Regie.ai if

  • You need ai sales agents.
  • You work on Web, Chrome extension.
  • You also want sequences.
Regie.ai review

Questions people ask

Is Default or Regie.ai better?
Neither clearly leads. Default starts at On request and Regie.ai at $180/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Default or Regie.ai?
Default starts at On request and Regie.ai at $180/month.
Does Default or Regie.ai run on more platforms?
Default runs on Web. Regie.ai runs on Web, Chrome extension.
What is Default best used for?
Default is most often used for a b2b software company losing inbound leads between form submission and a booked meeting because routing and scheduling are separate tools, a revenue operations team consolidating a scheduler, a routing tool, an enrichment vendor and an automation layer into one contract, a sales organisation with complex territory rules that needs routing decisions to be auditable when a representative disputes an assignment, a team that wants enrichment and ideal customer profile scoring applied before a lead reaches a representative, rather than cleaned up afterwards. Of those, a b2b software company losing inbound leads between form submission and a booked meeting because routing and scheduling are separate tools and a revenue operations team consolidating a scheduler, a routing tool, an enrichment vendor and an automation layer into one contract are not what Regie.ai is typically brought in for.
What can Default do that Regie.ai cannot?
Default covers Inbound routing, Native scheduling, Waterfall enrichment, Lead scoring. Regie.ai covers AI sales agents, Sequences, AI content generation, Power and parallel dialler.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Default: What does Default replace?

Typically a scheduler, a lead routing tool, an enrichment provider and part of a workflow automation layer.

Regie.ai: What is the minimum I can spend?

1,800 US dollars a month for AI SEP at its ten-seat minimum, or 2,495 a month for Force Multiplier at its five-seat minimum, both on annual terms.

Default: Is pricing published?

No. It is quoted, and reported structures involve a monthly platform fee plus separate user and routing seats plus metered enrichment credits.

Regie.ai: Does it replace SDRs?

It replaces some of the volume work, not the judgement. Teams still assign someone to review agent output, which reduces but does not eliminate the headcount argument.

Default: Does it replace the CRM?

No. It sits in front of the CRM, routing and enriching records and keeping them clean, and it writes to Salesforce or HubSpot.

Regie.ai: Does it replace Outreach or Salesloft?

It is sold as a replacement and covers sequencing and dialling, but admin depth and integration breadth are narrower than the incumbents.

Default: Is it worth it for a small team?

Rarely. The platform fee before seats means the economics work when you are retiring several existing subscriptions.

Regie.ai: Are contacts included?

Force Multiplier includes 1,000 accounts and 4,000 contacts per seat with custom enrichment. Beyond that you are into an overage discussion.

Share

Related pages

More on Default

More on Regie.ai

Keep looking

Other head to heads