Softwr

Sales Enablement · head to head

Arrows vs Regie.ai

Arrows logo

Arrows

Sales Enablement

AI agents that run a deal playbook and keep quiet pipeline moving, integrated with HubSpot and Salesforce

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Regie.ai logo

Regie.ai

Sales Enablement

AI sales agents that research, write and send outbound, with published per-seat pricing

From
$180/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Arrows the product has repositioned from HubSpot customer onboarding to AI-driven deal execution, so buyers acting on older recommendations may find the capability they were promised is no longer the focus of the roadmap.; Regie.ai the seat minimums invert the pricing logic: AI SEP at 180 US dollars requires ten seats while Force Multiplier at 499 requires five, so a small team is pushed to the expensive tier or excluded entirely.
  • They diverge on capability: Arrows covers Deal gameplan, Regie.ai covers AI sales agents.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Arrows and Regie.ai actually diverge.

Attributes where Arrows and Regie.ai differ
AttributeArrowsRegie.ai
Starting priceOn request$180/month
Pricing modelquotePer user per month
PlatformsWebWeb, Chrome extension

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Sales Enablement).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Arrows

  • Deal gameplan
  • Playbook definition
  • Rep workspace
  • Follow-through automation
  • CRM write-back
  • Research and preparation
  • Stakeholder tracking
  • Shared customer plans

Only in Regie.ai

  • AI sales agents
  • Sequences
  • AI content generation
  • Power and parallel dialler
  • Enrichment
  • Mailbox management
  • Human-in-the-loop review
  • CRM integration

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Arrows

  • A HubSpot-centred sales team whose deal records go stale because reps update the CRM only when a manager asksnot Regie.ai
  • A sales organisation where a consistent playbook exists on paper but nobody applies it below the top five deals in each pipelinenot Regie.ai
  • A company where deals go quiet for weeks and nobody notices until the close date slips, wanting the follow-up to happen without a rep rememberingnot Regie.ai
  • A revenue leader onboarding new account executives who need the playbook applied to their pipeline from day one rather than learned over two quartersnot Regie.ai

Regie.ai

  • A sales team asked to double outbound coverage without adding SDR headcount, using agents to work the long tail of accounts nobody currently touchesnot Arrows
  • A company with a large dormant contact database that needs systematic re-engagement rather than a one-off campaignnot Arrows
  • A revenue leader who wants outbound messaging to stay on brand across a team where message quality currently varies by repnot Arrows
  • A team consolidating a sequencer, a dialler and an AI writing tool into one contract to reduce vendor countnot Arrows

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Arrows

  • The product has repositioned from HubSpot customer onboarding to AI-driven deal execution, so buyers acting on older recommendations may find the capability they were promised is no longer the focus of the roadmap.
  • Pricing is not published and is scoped per engagement, so there is no benchmark, no self-serve entry, and two comparable buyers can be quoted materially different figures for the same product.
  • A scoping session is required before you get a number at all, which lengthens evaluation and makes it impossible to sanity-check budget before committing sales cycle time.
  • It depends on the CRM holding accurate deal and contact data; teams whose HubSpot or Salesforce hygiene is already poor get agents acting confidently on wrong information.
  • It is a small vendor in a category being entered by both CRM incumbents and well-funded agent startups, so betting a core sales workflow on it carries real continuity risk over a multi-year horizon.

Regie.ai

  • The seat minimums invert the pricing logic: AI SEP at 180 US dollars requires ten seats while Force Multiplier at 499 requires five, so a small team is pushed to the expensive tier or excluded entirely.
  • Autonomous agents amplify whatever list quality you feed them, and a poorly segmented database produces high-volume irrelevant outbound that damages your sending domain reputation rather than the vendor.
  • Contact and account allocations on Force Multiplier are capped at 1,000 accounts and 4,000 contacts per seat, so a team working a large territory hits an overage conversation partway through the contract year.
  • It occupies the same ground as established sales engagement platforms while being much younger, so integrations and admin controls are thinner than teams migrating from Outreach or Salesloft expect.
  • Agent-written messaging still needs human review to avoid errors that reach prospects, which means the headcount saving is smaller than the pitch implies once someone is assigned to check the output.

Pricing, plan by plan

Arrows

On request
  • Arrows$undefined/year
    • Deal gameplans and playbook execution
    • Rep workspace
    • Automated follow-through and CRM updates

Regie.ai

$180/month
  • AI SEP$180/month
    • 10 seat minimum
    • Sequences and cadences
    • Intent-based prioritisation
  • Force Multiplier Rep$499/month
    • 5 seat minimum
    • Everything in AI SEP
    • Autonomous outbound agents
  • AI Parallel Dialler add-on$150/month
    • Per user, on top of a base plan
    • Parallel dialling
    • 1,800 per user per year

Which should you pick?

Choose Arrows if

  • You need deal gameplan.
  • You also want playbook definition.
Arrows review

Choose Regie.ai if

  • You need ai sales agents.
  • You work on Web, Chrome extension.
  • You also want sequences.
Regie.ai review

Questions people ask

Is Arrows or Regie.ai better?
Neither clearly leads. Arrows starts at On request and Regie.ai at $180/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Arrows or Regie.ai?
Arrows starts at On request and Regie.ai at $180/month.
Does Arrows or Regie.ai run on more platforms?
Arrows runs on Web. Regie.ai runs on Web, Chrome extension.
What is Arrows best used for?
Arrows is most often used for a hubspot-centred sales team whose deal records go stale because reps update the crm only when a manager asks, a sales organisation where a consistent playbook exists on paper but nobody applies it below the top five deals in each pipeline, a company where deals go quiet for weeks and nobody notices until the close date slips, wanting the follow-up to happen without a rep remembering, a revenue leader onboarding new account executives who need the playbook applied to their pipeline from day one rather than learned over two quarters. Of those, a hubspot-centred sales team whose deal records go stale because reps update the crm only when a manager asks and a sales organisation where a consistent playbook exists on paper but nobody applies it below the top five deals in each pipeline are not what Regie.ai is typically brought in for.
What can Arrows do that Regie.ai cannot?
Arrows covers Deal gameplan, Playbook definition, Rep workspace, Follow-through automation. Regie.ai covers AI sales agents, Sequences, AI content generation, Power and parallel dialler.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Arrows: Is Arrows still a customer onboarding tool?

It is now positioned around AI-driven deal execution rather than post-sale onboarding. Confirm with the vendor that the onboarding plans you want are still sold as you expect.

Regie.ai: What is the minimum I can spend?

1,800 US dollars a month for AI SEP at its ten-seat minimum, or 2,495 a month for Force Multiplier at its five-seat minimum, both on annual terms.

Arrows: Do I need HubSpot?

HubSpot is the deepest integration and its historic home, but Salesforce is supported. It is a layer over a CRM, not a CRM replacement.

Regie.ai: Does it replace SDRs?

It replaces some of the volume work, not the judgement. Teams still assign someone to review agent output, which reduces but does not eliminate the headcount argument.

Arrows: How is it priced?

By scope of work and deal coverage, not per seat. The vendor runs a scoping session before proposing a figure, and nothing is published.

Regie.ai: Does it replace Outreach or Salesloft?

It is sold as a replacement and covers sequencing and dialling, but admin depth and integration breadth are narrower than the incumbents.

Arrows: Does it replace my CRM?

No. It writes back into HubSpot or Salesforce and gives reps a workspace so they spend less time in the CRM interface.

Regie.ai: Are contacts included?

Force Multiplier includes 1,000 accounts and 4,000 contacts per seat with custom enrichment. Beyond that you are into an overage discussion.

Share

Related pages

More on Arrows

More on Regie.ai

Keep looking

Other head to heads