Automation Integration · head to head
Cyclr vs UiPath

Cyclr
Automation Integration
Embedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
- From
- $1595/month
- Rated
- -

UiPath
Automation Integration
The leading platform for business process automation
- From
- $25/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cyclr entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.; UiPath the Basic plan from $25 per month caps the tenant at 5 Basic users, 5 Plus users, 1 Pro user and 2 unattended robots
- They diverge on capability: Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, UiPath covers Desktop RPA.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cyclr and UiPath actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cyclr
- White-label integration UI
- Connector library
- Workflow builder
- Custom connectors
- Regional hosting
- MCP server offering
- Usage metering
- Templates
Only in UiPath
- Desktop RPA
- Cloud RPA
- Process mining
- Task mining
- AI capabilities
- Monitoring
- Analytics
- 500+ connectors
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cyclr
- A mid-market SaaS vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a CRM integration it has not builtnot UiPath
- A product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectorsnot UiPath
- A European software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the EU for procurement reasonsnot UiPath
- A vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connectornot UiPath
UiPath
- Robotic process automation and business automationnot Cyclr
- Enterprise-wide deployment and process optimizationnot Cyclr
- UI automation and intelligent document processingnot Cyclr
- Large-scale automation programs with custom requirementsnot Cyclr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cyclr
- Entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.
- Connectors and API calls are metered separately, so a successful integration marketplace pushes you up tiers as your customers adopt it, meaning the cost rises with usage rather than with the revenue that usage generates.
- Custom connectors to APIs outside the library are your work to build and maintain, so the promise of not building integrations only holds for applications Cyclr already covers.
- Debugging is harder when the integration runs in a third-party runtime, because your support team sees a failed workflow rather than an HTTP response and has to escalate to Cyclr for anything non-obvious.
- Deep embedding creates real switching cost: your customers' live integrations run on Cyclr, so migrating later means recreating every customer workflow, which in practice means you rarely leave.
UiPath
- The Basic plan from $25 per month caps the tenant at 5 Basic users, 5 Plus users, 1 Pro user and 2 unattended robots
- Basic tenants are hosted only in the European region
- Only the Basic tier carries a published price; Standard and Enterprise require contacting sales
- Self healing automation, process simulation, Elastic Robot Orchestration, bring your own encryption keys and dedicated deployments are Enterprise only
- Agent capability is limited on Basic and requires Standard or Enterprise
- Extra unattended robots are purchased separately on top of the plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Cyclr
$1595/month- PAYG$1595/month
- 100,000 API calls included
- 1 connector included
- Unlimited integrations and users
- Growth$2595/month
- 1,000,000 API calls included
- 10 connectors included
- Everything in PAYG
- Scale$7195/month
- 5,000,000 API calls included
- Unlimited connectors
- Everything in Growth
- Private Cloud$undefined/month
- Dedicated hosting in US, UK or EU
- Configurable processing and runtime
- Quoted pricing
UiPath
$25/month- Automation Cloud Basic$25/month
- Build and run basic personal automations
- Limited scale
- 99.9% service uptime
- Automation Cloud Standard$null/month
- Enterprise automation capabilities
- Document classification and extraction at scale
- No limits to scale
- Automation Cloud Enterprise$null/month
- Self-healing UI automation
- Process optimization and simulation
- Infrastructure automation
- Test Cloud Standard$null/month
- Contact Sales for pricing
Which should you pick?
Choose Cyclr if
- You need white-label integration ui.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want connector library.
Questions people ask
- Is Cyclr or UiPath better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cyclr starts at $1595/month and UiPath at $25/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cyclr or UiPath?
- Cyclr starts at $1595/month and UiPath at $25/month.
- Does Cyclr or UiPath run on more platforms?
- Cyclr runs on Web, API. UiPath runs on Desktop, Web.
- What is Cyclr best used for?
- Cyclr is most often used for a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built, a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors, a european software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the eu for procurement reasons, a vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connector. Of those, a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built and a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors are not what UiPath is typically brought in for.
- What can Cyclr do that UiPath cannot?
- Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Connector library, Workflow builder, Custom connectors. UiPath covers Desktop RPA, Cloud RPA, Process mining, Task mining.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cyclr: What does Cyclr actually cost?
Published tiers start at 1,595 US dollars per month for 100,000 API calls and one connector, rising to 7,195 for unlimited connectors and five million calls.
UiPath: How much does UiPath cost?
UiPath Automation Cloud Basic starts at $25/month for individuals and small teams. Standard and Enterprise tiers require contacting sales for custom pricing based on organizational needs.
SourceCyclr: Do my customers know they are using Cyclr?
No. The interface is white-labelled to appear as part of your product.
UiPath: What are the limitations of UiPath's Basic tier?
The Basic tier at $25/month is limited to building and running basic personal automations at limited scale, with European region hosting only and bronze-level support. Standard and Enterprise tiers remove these limits.
SourceCyclr: Can I host it in the EU or UK?
Yes, on the private cloud tiers, which matters for European procurement requirements.
UiPath: Does UiPath charge for users and robots separately?
UiPath's pricing tiers include base costs, but users, robots, and agents may require additional purchases beyond the tier pricing, depending on organizational requirements.
SourceCyclr: What if the connector I need does not exist?
You build a custom connector using Cyclr tooling, which is work you own rather than work the platform removes.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cyclr vs Tray.io
- Cyclr vs Celigo
- Cyclr vs Workato
- Cyclr vs Alloy Automation
- Cyclr vs Paragon
- Cyclr vs Nango
- Cyclr vs Merge
- Cyclr vs Hatchet
- Cyclr vs Zapier
- Cyclr vs MuleSoft
- Cyclr vs Dagster
- Cyclr vs Fivetran
- Cyclr vs Informatica
- Cyclr vs Integromat
- Cyclr vs jBPM
- Cyclr vs Kogito
- Cyclr vs Letta
- Cyclr vs Lytics
- Cyclr vs Blue Prism
- Cyclr vs Automation Anywhere
- Cyclr vs Talend
- Cyclr vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Cyclr vs Nintex
- Cyclr vs Boomi
- Cyclr vs n8n
- Cyclr vs Jitterbit
- Cyclr vs Activiti
- Cyclr vs Automate.io
- Cyclr vs Autonoly
- Cyclr vs Browser Use
- Cyclr vs Browserbase
- UiPath vs Tray.io
- UiPath vs Celigo
- UiPath vs Workato
- UiPath vs Alloy Automation
- UiPath vs Paragon
- UiPath vs Nango
- UiPath vs Merge
- UiPath vs Hatchet
- UiPath vs Zapier
- UiPath vs MuleSoft
- UiPath vs Dagster
- UiPath vs Fivetran
- UiPath vs Informatica
- UiPath vs Integromat
- UiPath vs jBPM
- UiPath vs Kogito
- UiPath vs Letta
- UiPath vs Lytics
- UiPath vs Blue Prism
- UiPath vs Automation Anywhere
- UiPath vs Talend
- UiPath vs Microsoft Power Automate
- UiPath vs Nintex
- UiPath vs Boomi
- UiPath vs n8n
- UiPath vs Jitterbit
- UiPath vs Activiti
- UiPath vs Automate.io
- UiPath vs Autonoly
- UiPath vs Browser Use
- UiPath vs Browserbase
