Government · head to head
Clariti vs Sumsub

Clariti
Government
Permitting, licensing and land management for local government, built natively on Salesforce
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Sumsub
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening priced per verification
- From
- $1.35/verification
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clariti salesforce platform licences sit underneath the subscription and are not always visible in the initial quote, so the fully loaded cost can be materially higher than the comparison against Accela or Tyler suggests.; Sumsub the published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- They diverge on capability: Clariti covers Permitting workflows, Sumsub covers Document verification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clariti and Sumsub actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clariti
- Permitting workflows
- Business licensing
- Inspections
- Code enforcement
- Public portal
- Salesforce platform tooling
Only in Sumsub
- Document verification
- AML screening
- KYB verification
- No-code flow builder
- Transaction monitoring
- Travel Rule
- Fraud and duplicate detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clariti
- A city already standardised on Salesforce that wants permitting inside the same platformnot Sumsub
- An agency replacing a legacy permitting system whose vendor was acquired and whose roadmap stallednot Sumsub
- A county needing configurable workflows across permits, licensing and code enforcementnot Sumsub
- An IT department that wants to configure and report on its own permitting workflows without vendor ticketsnot Sumsub
Sumsub
- A crypto exchange needing KYC plus Travel Rule handling under one contractnot Clariti
- A gambling operator entering several European markets and needing document coverage without a separate vendor per countrynot Clariti
- A fintech that wants a published price it can model in a business case before speaking to a salespersonnot Clariti
- A marketplace verifying both individual sellers and the companies behind them without buying two productsnot Clariti
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clariti
- Salesforce platform licences sit underneath the subscription and are not always visible in the initial quote, so the fully loaded cost can be materially higher than the comparison against Accela or Tyler suggests.
- Building on Salesforce means the agency inherits Salesforce release cycles and pricing changes, neither of which Clariti controls.
- It has far less accumulated edge case handling than the incumbents, so unusual fee schedules, historic district rules or state mandated reporting can become configuration projects.
- Professional services dominate the first year cost, as with every permitting implementation, and agencies that budget only for licence are the ones whose projects stall.
- The install base is smaller than Accela or Tyler, so there are fewer peer agencies to call for reference and fewer trained implementation consultants in the market.
Sumsub
- The published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- You are billed per verification attempt in most configurations, meaning applicant drop-off and resubmissions cost money without producing a customer.
- Pass rates and document support vary noticeably by country, and a market that works well in Europe can produce materially worse rejection rates in parts of Africa and South East Asia.
- The AML screening tier bundles list coverage that large institutions would normally buy separately and tune, giving less control over match thresholds than a dedicated screening vendor.
- The company originated in Russia before restructuring to a UK entity, and some financial institutions still raise that history in vendor risk review, which can slow or block procurement at conservative banks.
Pricing, plan by plan
Clariti
On request- Clariti$undefined/year
- Quoted by agency size and module scope
- Salesforce platform licences are a separate cost underneath the subscription
- Implementation and configuration services typically exceed first year licence cost
Sumsub
$1.35/verification- Basic$1.35/verification
- 149 USD minimum monthly spend
- Document verification and liveness
- No-code flow builder
- Compliance$1.85/verification
- 299 USD minimum monthly spend
- Everything in Basic
- AML sanctions and PEP screening
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated volume rate
- Custom jurisdictions and languages
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Clariti if
- You need permitting workflows.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want business licensing.
Choose Sumsub if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want aml screening.
Questions people ask
- Is Clariti or Sumsub better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clariti starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clariti or Sumsub?
- Clariti starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification.
- Does Clariti or Sumsub run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Clariti best used for?
- Clariti is most often used for a city already standardised on salesforce that wants permitting inside the same platform, an agency replacing a legacy permitting system whose vendor was acquired and whose roadmap stalled, a county needing configurable workflows across permits, licensing and code enforcement, an it department that wants to configure and report on its own permitting workflows without vendor tickets. Of those, a city already standardised on salesforce that wants permitting inside the same platform and an agency replacing a legacy permitting system whose vendor was acquired and whose roadmap stalled are not what Sumsub is typically brought in for.
- What can Clariti do that Sumsub cannot?
- Clariti covers Permitting workflows, Business licensing, Inspections, Code enforcement. Sumsub covers Document verification, AML screening, KYB verification, No-code flow builder.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clariti: Do we need Salesforce licences as well?
Yes. Clariti runs on the Salesforce platform, and those licences are a separate line item. Insist on a fully loaded quote.
Sumsub: What does a verification actually cost?
1.35 USD on Basic and 1.85 USD on Compliance, but with 149 and 299 USD monthly minimums respectively. Below roughly 110 or 160 checks a month you are paying the minimum, not the rate.
Clariti: How does it compare with Accela?
Accela has far deeper accumulated handling of edge cases. Clariti offers a more modern and configurable platform, at the price of Salesforce underneath.
Sumsub: Do failed verifications get charged?
Attempts are generally billable, so a poor onboarding funnel raises your bill. Confirm the exact resubmission policy in your contract.
Clariti: Can we see what other agencies paid?
Yes. Permitting contracts are public records and award notices routinely list implementation and annual subscription values.
Sumsub: Does it cover business verification?
Yes, KYB with company registry lookups and beneficial owner resolution is part of the platform rather than a separate product.
Clariti: Is it suitable for a small town?
Usually not. The platform cost and implementation effort suit mid sized and larger agencies.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Clariti vs Accela
- Clariti vs CityView
- Clariti vs Tyler Technologies
- Clariti vs GovPilot
- Clariti vs mySidewalk
- Clariti vs NEOGOV
- Clariti vs ArchiveSocial
- Clariti vs Bonfire
- Clariti vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Clariti vs Periscope Holdings
- Clariti vs Zencity
- Clariti vs OpenGov
- Clariti vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Clariti vs NextRequest
- Clariti vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Clariti vs VUEWorks
- Clariti vs American Legal Publishing
- Clariti vs Shufti Pro
- Clariti vs Jumio
- Clariti vs Socure
- Clariti vs Signicat
- Clariti vs iDenfy
- Clariti vs Trulioo
- Clariti vs Veriff
- Clariti vs IDnow
- Clariti vs Quantexa
- Clariti vs Fenergo
- Clariti vs NICE Actimize
- Clariti vs Yoti
- Clariti vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Clariti vs Mimecast
- Clariti vs Motorola Vigilant
- Clariti vs Nessus
- Clariti vs NordPass
- Clariti vs One Identity
- Sumsub vs Accela
- Sumsub vs CityView
- Sumsub vs Tyler Technologies
- Sumsub vs GovPilot
- Sumsub vs mySidewalk
- Sumsub vs NEOGOV
- Sumsub vs ArchiveSocial
- Sumsub vs Bonfire
- Sumsub vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Sumsub vs Periscope Holdings
- Sumsub vs Zencity
- Sumsub vs OpenGov
- Sumsub vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Sumsub vs NextRequest
- Sumsub vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Sumsub vs VUEWorks
- Sumsub vs American Legal Publishing
- Sumsub vs Shufti Pro
- Sumsub vs Jumio
- Sumsub vs Socure
- Sumsub vs Signicat
- Sumsub vs iDenfy
- Sumsub vs Trulioo
- Sumsub vs Veriff
- Sumsub vs IDnow
- Sumsub vs Quantexa
- Sumsub vs Fenergo
- Sumsub vs NICE Actimize
- Sumsub vs Yoti
- Sumsub vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Sumsub vs Mimecast
- Sumsub vs Motorola Vigilant
- Sumsub vs Nessus
- Sumsub vs NordPass
- Sumsub vs One Identity
