Cybersecurity · head to head
Signicat vs Sumsub

Signicat
Cybersecurity
European digital identity hub connecting national eID schemes
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sumsub
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening priced per verification
- From
- $1.35/verification
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Signicat national eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.; Sumsub the published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- They diverge on capability: Signicat covers eID scheme brokering, Sumsub covers KYB verification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Signicat and Sumsub actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Signicat
- eID scheme brokering
- Qualified electronic signatures
- Authentication
- Digital onboarding flows
- eIDAS compliance
Only in Sumsub
- KYB verification
- No-code flow builder
- Transaction monitoring
- Travel Rule
- Fraud and duplicate detection
Both cover
- Document verification
- AML screening
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Signicat
- A lender expanding from Norway into Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands without four separate eID integrationsnot Sumsub
- An insurer needing eIDAS qualified signatures on policy documents that will hold up in a European courtnot Sumsub
- A bank that wants customers to onboard with their existing national bank ID rather than photographing a passportnot Sumsub
- A public sector body needing cross-border recognition of notified eID schemes under eIDASnot Sumsub
Sumsub
- A crypto exchange needing KYC plus Travel Rule handling under one contractnot Signicat
- A gambling operator entering several European markets and needing document coverage without a separate vendor per countrynot Signicat
- A fintech that wants a published price it can model in a business case before speaking to a salespersonnot Signicat
- A marketplace verifying both individual sellers and the companies behind them without buying two productsnot Signicat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Signicat
- National eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- Value is concentrated in Northern and Western Europe, and coverage in Southern and Eastern Europe is thinner, so a pan-European rollout still hits gaps requiring document fallback.
- Pricing is per transaction and quoted, and because scheme rates vary by country the cost per onboarded customer differs materially between markets in ways that complicate unit economics.
- Each eID scheme connection typically carries its own setup fee and approval process, so adding a country is a project with a lead time rather than a configuration change.
- Availability is tied to the national schemes, meaning an outage at BankID or MitID stops your onboarding entirely and there is no vendor-side mitigation for it.
Sumsub
- The published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- You are billed per verification attempt in most configurations, meaning applicant drop-off and resubmissions cost money without producing a customer.
- Pass rates and document support vary noticeably by country, and a market that works well in Europe can produce materially worse rejection rates in parts of Africa and South East Asia.
- The AML screening tier bundles list coverage that large institutions would normally buy separately and tune, giving less control over match thresholds than a dedicated screening vendor.
- The company originated in Russia before restructuring to a UK entity, and some financial institutions still raise that history in vendor risk review, which can slow or block procurement at conservative banks.
Pricing, plan by plan
Signicat
On request- Signicat Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per transaction with national scheme fees passed through
- Signature and verification products licensed separately
- Setup fee per eID scheme connected
Sumsub
$1.35/verification- Basic$1.35/verification
- 149 USD minimum monthly spend
- Document verification and liveness
- No-code flow builder
- Compliance$1.85/verification
- 299 USD minimum monthly spend
- Everything in Basic
- AML sanctions and PEP screening
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated volume rate
- Custom jurisdictions and languages
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Signicat if
- You need eid scheme brokering.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want qualified electronic signatures.
Choose Sumsub if
- You need kyb verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want no-code flow builder.
Questions people ask
- Is Signicat or Sumsub better?
- Neither clearly leads. Signicat starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Signicat or Sumsub?
- Signicat starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification.
- Does Signicat or Sumsub run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Signicat best used for?
- Signicat is most often used for a lender expanding from norway into sweden, denmark and the netherlands without four separate eid integrations, an insurer needing eidas qualified signatures on policy documents that will hold up in a european court, a bank that wants customers to onboard with their existing national bank id rather than photographing a passport, a public sector body needing cross-border recognition of notified eid schemes under eidas. Of those, a lender expanding from norway into sweden, denmark and the netherlands without four separate eid integrations and an insurer needing eidas qualified signatures on policy documents that will hold up in a european court are not what Sumsub is typically brought in for.
- What can Signicat do that Sumsub cannot?
- Signicat covers eID scheme brokering, Qualified electronic signatures, Authentication, Digital onboarding flows. Sumsub covers KYB verification, No-code flow builder, Transaction monitoring, Travel Rule. Both handle Document verification, AML screening.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Signicat: Is this an alternative to a document verification vendor?
Only where national eID exists. In markets with a mature bank ID scheme it is better; elsewhere you fall back to document checks, which Signicat also provides.
Sumsub: What does a verification actually cost?
1.35 USD on Basic and 1.85 USD on Compliance, but with 149 and 299 USD monthly minimums respectively. Below roughly 110 or 160 checks a month you are paying the minimum, not the rate.
Signicat: Do we still pay the eID schemes?
Yes. Scheme fees are passed through in addition to Signicat charges. Ask for the split when comparing to a direct integration.
Sumsub: Do failed verifications get charged?
Attempts are generally billable, so a poor onboarding funnel raises your bill. Confirm the exact resubmission policy in your contract.
Signicat: Are signatures legally qualified?
Signicat supports eIDAS qualified electronic signatures, which carry the highest legal standing in the EU, as well as advanced signatures.
Sumsub: Does it cover business verification?
Yes, KYB with company registry lookups and beneficial owner resolution is part of the platform rather than a separate product.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Signicat vs Jumio
- Signicat vs IDnow
- Signicat vs Trulioo
- Signicat vs Veriff
- Signicat vs iDenfy
- Signicat vs Yoti
- Signicat vs Shufti Pro
- Signicat vs Socure
- Signicat vs March Networks
- Signicat vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Signicat vs Semperis
- Signicat vs MetricStream
- Signicat vs Microsoft Defender
- Signicat vs Mimecast
- Signicat vs Motorola Vigilant
- Signicat vs Nessus
- Signicat vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Signicat vs Quantexa
- Signicat vs Fenergo
- Signicat vs NICE Actimize
- Signicat vs NordPass
- Signicat vs One Identity
- Sumsub vs Jumio
- Sumsub vs IDnow
- Sumsub vs Trulioo
- Sumsub vs Veriff
- Sumsub vs iDenfy
- Sumsub vs Yoti
- Sumsub vs Shufti Pro
- Sumsub vs Socure
- Sumsub vs March Networks
- Sumsub vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Sumsub vs Semperis
- Sumsub vs MetricStream
- Sumsub vs Microsoft Defender
- Sumsub vs Mimecast
- Sumsub vs Motorola Vigilant
- Sumsub vs Nessus
- Sumsub vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Sumsub vs Quantexa
- Sumsub vs Fenergo
- Sumsub vs NICE Actimize
- Sumsub vs NordPass
- Sumsub vs One Identity
