Government · head to head
ArchiveSocial vs Sumsub

ArchiveSocial
Government
Social media archiving that captures public agency accounts as legally defensible open records
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Sumsub
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening priced per verification
- From
- $1.35/verification
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ArchiveSocial coverage depends entirely on third party platform APIs, so when a network restricts or reprices its API the archive's completeness changes for reasons the vendor does not control.; Sumsub the published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- They diverge on capability: ArchiveSocial covers Continuous capture, Sumsub covers Document verification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArchiveSocial and Sumsub actually diverge.
| Attribute | ArchiveSocial | Sumsub |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $1.35/verification |
| Pricing model | quote | Per verification |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArchiveSocial
- Continuous capture
- Deletion and edit capture
- Authenticated records
- Records request search
- Litigation hold export
- Multi platform coverage
Only in Sumsub
- Document verification
- AML screening
- KYB verification
- No-code flow builder
- Transaction monitoring
- Travel Rule
- Fraud and duplicate detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArchiveSocial
- A city whose legal department has flagged deleted social media comments as a records liabilitynot Sumsub
- A police department that must produce social media records under an open records requestnot Sumsub
- An agency under litigation hold needing authenticated social media evidence rather than screenshotsnot Sumsub
- A communications team operating many accounts across departments with no consistent archivingnot Sumsub
Sumsub
- A crypto exchange needing KYC plus Travel Rule handling under one contractnot ArchiveSocial
- A gambling operator entering several European markets and needing document coverage without a separate vendor per countrynot ArchiveSocial
- A fintech that wants a published price it can model in a business case before speaking to a salespersonnot ArchiveSocial
- A marketplace verifying both individual sellers and the companies behind them without buying two productsnot ArchiveSocial
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArchiveSocial
- Coverage depends entirely on third party platform APIs, so when a network restricts or reprices its API the archive's completeness changes for reasons the vendor does not control.
- Pricing scales with the number of archived accounts, so an agency where every department runs its own page pays repeatedly for the same compliance obligation.
- It archives rather than governs, so it will faithfully preserve a policy violation without preventing it, and agencies still need social media policy and training.
- Since the 2021 CivicPlus acquisition the product is part of a municipal suite, so buyers avoiding that vendor for other reasons are still buying from them.
- The value is entirely insurance shaped, which makes it a perennial target during budget cuts right up until the first records request it would have answered.
Sumsub
- The published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- You are billed per verification attempt in most configurations, meaning applicant drop-off and resubmissions cost money without producing a customer.
- Pass rates and document support vary noticeably by country, and a market that works well in Europe can produce materially worse rejection rates in parts of Africa and South East Asia.
- The AML screening tier bundles list coverage that large institutions would normally buy separately and tune, giving less control over match thresholds than a dedicated screening vendor.
- The company originated in Russia before restructuring to a UK entity, and some financial institutions still raise that history in vendor risk review, which can slow or block procurement at conservative banks.
Pricing, plan by plan
ArchiveSocial
On request- ArchiveSocial$undefined/year
- Quoted annually, typically scaled by number of archived accounts
- Additional accounts and platforms increase the subscription
- Bundled pricing common for agencies already buying CivicPlus products
Sumsub
$1.35/verification- Basic$1.35/verification
- 149 USD minimum monthly spend
- Document verification and liveness
- No-code flow builder
- Compliance$1.85/verification
- 299 USD minimum monthly spend
- Everything in Basic
- AML sanctions and PEP screening
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated volume rate
- Custom jurisdictions and languages
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose ArchiveSocial if
- You need continuous capture.
- You also want deletion and edit capture.
Choose Sumsub if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want aml screening.
Questions people ask
- Is ArchiveSocial or Sumsub better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArchiveSocial starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArchiveSocial or Sumsub?
- ArchiveSocial starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification.
- Does ArchiveSocial or Sumsub run on more platforms?
- ArchiveSocial runs on Web. Sumsub runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is ArchiveSocial best used for?
- ArchiveSocial is most often used for a city whose legal department has flagged deleted social media comments as a records liability, a police department that must produce social media records under an open records request, an agency under litigation hold needing authenticated social media evidence rather than screenshots, a communications team operating many accounts across departments with no consistent archiving. Of those, a city whose legal department has flagged deleted social media comments as a records liability and a police department that must produce social media records under an open records request are not what Sumsub is typically brought in for.
- What can ArchiveSocial do that Sumsub cannot?
- ArchiveSocial covers Continuous capture, Deletion and edit capture, Authenticated records, Records request search. Sumsub covers Document verification, AML screening, KYB verification, No-code flow builder.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArchiveSocial: Why not just export data from the platforms?
Platform exports do not reliably capture deleted or edited content and carry no chain of custody, which is what makes an archive usable as evidence.
Sumsub: What does a verification actually cost?
1.35 USD on Basic and 1.85 USD on Compliance, but with 149 and 299 USD monthly minimums respectively. Below roughly 110 or 160 checks a month you are paying the minimum, not the rate.
ArchiveSocial: Are public comments on our posts records?
In many United States jurisdictions yes, and deleted comments have been the subject of litigation against agencies.
Sumsub: Do failed verifications get charged?
Attempts are generally billable, so a poor onboarding funnel raises your bill. Confirm the exact resubmission policy in your contract.
ArchiveSocial: Who owns ArchiveSocial?
CivicPlus, which acquired it in 2021 and sells it alongside its municipal website and communications products.
Sumsub: Does it cover business verification?
Yes, KYB with company registry lookups and beneficial owner resolution is part of the platform rather than a separate product.
ArchiveSocial: How is it priced?
By archived accounts, quoted rather than published. Comparable agency contracts are public records.
Related pages
More on ArchiveSocial
Other head to heads
- ArchiveSocial vs NextRequest
- ArchiveSocial vs Granicus
- ArchiveSocial vs Zencity
- ArchiveSocial vs Bonfire
- ArchiveSocial vs NEOGOV
- ArchiveSocial vs AWS GovCloud
- ArchiveSocial vs Clariti
- ArchiveSocial vs GovPilot
- ArchiveSocial vs mySidewalk
- ArchiveSocial vs Periscope Holdings
- ArchiveSocial vs Axon Records
- ArchiveSocial vs DataSF
- ArchiveSocial vs Google Cloud for Government
- ArchiveSocial vs iCompass
- ArchiveSocial vs Mapbox Government
- ArchiveSocial vs GovQA
- ArchiveSocial vs Shufti Pro
- ArchiveSocial vs Jumio
- ArchiveSocial vs Socure
- ArchiveSocial vs Signicat
- ArchiveSocial vs iDenfy
- ArchiveSocial vs Trulioo
- ArchiveSocial vs Veriff
- ArchiveSocial vs IDnow
- ArchiveSocial vs Quantexa
- ArchiveSocial vs Fenergo
- ArchiveSocial vs NICE Actimize
- ArchiveSocial vs Yoti
- ArchiveSocial vs Microsoft Sentinel
- ArchiveSocial vs Mimecast
- ArchiveSocial vs Motorola Vigilant
- ArchiveSocial vs Nessus
- ArchiveSocial vs NordPass
- ArchiveSocial vs One Identity
- Sumsub vs NextRequest
- Sumsub vs Granicus
- Sumsub vs Zencity
- Sumsub vs Bonfire
- Sumsub vs NEOGOV
- Sumsub vs AWS GovCloud
- Sumsub vs Clariti
- Sumsub vs GovPilot
- Sumsub vs mySidewalk
- Sumsub vs Periscope Holdings
- Sumsub vs Axon Records
- Sumsub vs DataSF
- Sumsub vs Google Cloud for Government
- Sumsub vs iCompass
- Sumsub vs Mapbox Government
- Sumsub vs GovQA
- Sumsub vs Shufti Pro
- Sumsub vs Jumio
- Sumsub vs Socure
- Sumsub vs Signicat
- Sumsub vs iDenfy
- Sumsub vs Trulioo
- Sumsub vs Veriff
- Sumsub vs IDnow
- Sumsub vs Quantexa
- Sumsub vs Fenergo
- Sumsub vs NICE Actimize
- Sumsub vs Yoti
- Sumsub vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Sumsub vs Mimecast
- Sumsub vs Motorola Vigilant
- Sumsub vs Nessus
- Sumsub vs NordPass
- Sumsub vs One Identity
