Government · head to head
Clariti vs NEOGOV

Clariti
Government
Permitting, licensing and land management for local government, built natively on Salesforce
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

NEOGOV
Government
Public sector HR suite covering civil service recruiting, onboarding, training and policy management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clariti salesforce platform licences sit underneath the subscription and are not always visible in the initial quote, so the fully loaded cost can be materially higher than the comparison against Accela or Tyler suggests.; NEOGOV each module is shallower than the specialist product it competes with, so agencies buying the full suite for coherence accept weaker performance management and learning than they would get separately.
- They diverge on capability: Clariti covers Permitting workflows, NEOGOV covers Civil service recruiting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clariti and NEOGOV actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Government).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clariti
- Permitting workflows
- Business licensing
- Inspections
- Code enforcement
- Public portal
- Salesforce platform tooling
Only in NEOGOV
- Civil service recruiting
- Veterans preference handling
- GovernmentJobs.com posting
- Onboarding workflows
- Learning and training records
- Policy management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clariti
- A city already standardised on Salesforce that wants permitting inside the same platformnot NEOGOV
- An agency replacing a legacy permitting system whose vendor was acquired and whose roadmap stallednot NEOGOV
- A county needing configurable workflows across permits, licensing and code enforcementnot NEOGOV
- An IT department that wants to configure and report on its own permitting workflows without vendor ticketsnot NEOGOV
NEOGOV
- A city or county HR department that must run scored examinations and ranked eligibility listsnot Clariti
- A public safety agency needing policy acknowledgement records that stand up in litigationnot Clariti
- An agency replacing a commercial applicant tracking system that cannot handle veterans preferencenot Clariti
- A school district or university consolidating recruiting, onboarding and mandated training recordsnot Clariti
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clariti
- Salesforce platform licences sit underneath the subscription and are not always visible in the initial quote, so the fully loaded cost can be materially higher than the comparison against Accela or Tyler suggests.
- Building on Salesforce means the agency inherits Salesforce release cycles and pricing changes, neither of which Clariti controls.
- It has far less accumulated edge case handling than the incumbents, so unusual fee schedules, historic district rules or state mandated reporting can become configuration projects.
- Professional services dominate the first year cost, as with every permitting implementation, and agencies that budget only for licence are the ones whose projects stall.
- The install base is smaller than Accela or Tyler, so there are fewer peer agencies to call for reference and fewer trained implementation consultants in the market.
NEOGOV
- Each module is shallower than the specialist product it competes with, so agencies buying the full suite for coherence accept weaker performance management and learning than they would get separately.
- Policy management arrived through the PowerDMS acquisition rather than being built in, and the join between it and the rest of the suite still reads as two products.
- Implementation is long and configuration heavy because the civil service rules that make the product valuable have to be encoded for your jurisdiction, and that work is billed.
- Pricing is not published and scales with headcount, so a large agency can pay several times what a comparable one pays without knowing it unless someone reads the public contracts.
- Private equity ownership since the Warburg Pincus investment has coincided with an acquisition led strategy, and buyers should expect further products bolted on rather than deeper integration of the existing ones.
Pricing, plan by plan
Clariti
On request- Clariti$undefined/year
- Quoted by agency size and module scope
- Salesforce platform licences are a separate cost underneath the subscription
- Implementation and configuration services typically exceed first year licence cost
NEOGOV
On request- NEOGOV Suite$undefined/year
- Quoted per module and scaled by employee headcount
- Implementation and data migration priced separately from the subscription
- Available through cooperative purchasing and state term contracts
Which should you pick?
Choose Clariti if
- You need permitting workflows.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want business licensing.
Choose NEOGOV if
- You need civil service recruiting.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want veterans preference handling.
Questions people ask
- Is Clariti or NEOGOV better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clariti starts at On request and NEOGOV at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clariti or NEOGOV?
- Clariti starts at On request and NEOGOV at On request.
- Does Clariti or NEOGOV run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Clariti best used for?
- Clariti is most often used for a city already standardised on salesforce that wants permitting inside the same platform, an agency replacing a legacy permitting system whose vendor was acquired and whose roadmap stalled, a county needing configurable workflows across permits, licensing and code enforcement, an it department that wants to configure and report on its own permitting workflows without vendor tickets. Of those, a city already standardised on salesforce that wants permitting inside the same platform and an agency replacing a legacy permitting system whose vendor was acquired and whose roadmap stalled are not what NEOGOV is typically brought in for.
- What can Clariti do that NEOGOV cannot?
- Clariti covers Permitting workflows, Business licensing, Inspections, Code enforcement. NEOGOV covers Civil service recruiting, Veterans preference handling, GovernmentJobs.com posting, Onboarding workflows.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clariti: Do we need Salesforce licences as well?
Yes. Clariti runs on the Salesforce platform, and those licences are a separate line item. Insist on a fully loaded quote.
NEOGOV: Why not use a commercial applicant tracking system?
Because civil service rules such as ranked eligibility lists, rule of three certification and veterans preference are not expressible in commercial products, so the statutory steps end up in spreadsheets.
Clariti: How does it compare with Accela?
Accela has far deeper accumulated handling of edge cases. Clariti offers a more modern and configurable platform, at the price of Salesforce underneath.
NEOGOV: Can I find out what other agencies pay?
Yes. These are public procurements, so executed contract values appear in council agenda packets and state term contract listings. Read several before negotiating.
Clariti: Can we see what other agencies paid?
Yes. Permitting contracts are public records and award notices routinely list implementation and annual subscription values.
NEOGOV: What did NEOGOV acquire?
PowerDMS, a policy management and accreditation product, in 2021, which is now sold as the policy module of the suite.
Clariti: Is it suitable for a small town?
Usually not. The platform cost and implementation effort suit mid sized and larger agencies.
NEOGOV: Is it only for the United States?
Effectively yes. The value is in encoding US civil service and public safety requirements.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Clariti vs Accela
- Clariti vs CityView
- Clariti vs Tyler Technologies
- Clariti vs GovPilot
- Clariti vs mySidewalk
- Clariti vs ArchiveSocial
- Clariti vs Bonfire
- Clariti vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Clariti vs Periscope Holdings
- Clariti vs Zencity
- Clariti vs OpenGov
- Clariti vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Clariti vs NextRequest
- Clariti vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Clariti vs VUEWorks
- Clariti vs American Legal Publishing
- Clariti vs Granicus
- Clariti vs Euna Solutions
- Clariti vs IAPro
- Clariti vs iCompass
- Clariti vs Mapbox Government
- Clariti vs Mark43
- Clariti vs MuckRock
- Clariti vs GovQA
- NEOGOV vs Accela
- NEOGOV vs CityView
- NEOGOV vs Tyler Technologies
- NEOGOV vs GovPilot
- NEOGOV vs mySidewalk
- NEOGOV vs ArchiveSocial
- NEOGOV vs Bonfire
- NEOGOV vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- NEOGOV vs Periscope Holdings
- NEOGOV vs Zencity
- NEOGOV vs OpenGov
- NEOGOV vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- NEOGOV vs NextRequest
- NEOGOV vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- NEOGOV vs VUEWorks
- NEOGOV vs American Legal Publishing
- NEOGOV vs Granicus
- NEOGOV vs Euna Solutions
- NEOGOV vs IAPro
- NEOGOV vs iCompass
- NEOGOV vs Mapbox Government
- NEOGOV vs Mark43
- NEOGOV vs MuckRock
- NEOGOV vs GovQA
