Government · head to head
CityView vs Clariti

Clariti
Government
Permitting, licensing and land management for local government, built natively on Salesforce
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CityView high implementation and licensing costs for smaller municipalities; Clariti salesforce platform licences sit underneath the subscription and are not always visible in the initial quote, so the fully loaded cost can be materially higher than the comparison against Accela or Tyler suggests.
- They diverge on capability: CityView covers Building Permits, Clariti covers Permitting workflows.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CityView and Clariti actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Government).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CityView
- Building Permits
- Business Licensing
- Code Enforcement
- Inspections Management
- Online Citizen Portal
- Esri ArcGIS
- Microsoft Office
- Payment Gateways
Only in Clariti
- Permitting workflows
- Business licensing
- Inspections
- Code enforcement
- Public portal
- Salesforce platform tooling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CityView
- Citizen Servicesnot Clariti
- Records Managementnot Clariti
- Public Safetynot Clariti
- Civic Engagementnot Clariti
Clariti
- A city already standardised on Salesforce that wants permitting inside the same platformnot CityView
- An agency replacing a legacy permitting system whose vendor was acquired and whose roadmap stallednot CityView
- A county needing configurable workflows across permits, licensing and code enforcementnot CityView
- An IT department that wants to configure and report on its own permitting workflows without vendor ticketsnot CityView
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CityView
- High implementation and licensing costs for smaller municipalities
- Complex setup and customization requiring expert assistance
Clariti
- Salesforce platform licences sit underneath the subscription and are not always visible in the initial quote, so the fully loaded cost can be materially higher than the comparison against Accela or Tyler suggests.
- Building on Salesforce means the agency inherits Salesforce release cycles and pricing changes, neither of which Clariti controls.
- It has far less accumulated edge case handling than the incumbents, so unusual fee schedules, historic district rules or state mandated reporting can become configuration projects.
- Professional services dominate the first year cost, as with every permitting implementation, and agencies that budget only for licence are the ones whose projects stall.
- The install base is smaller than Accela or Tyler, so there are fewer peer agencies to call for reference and fewer trained implementation consultants in the market.
Pricing, plan by plan
CityView
$10000/yearNo published plan breakdown. See the CityView review.
Clariti
On request- Clariti$undefined/year
- Quoted by agency size and module scope
- Salesforce platform licences are a separate cost underneath the subscription
- Implementation and configuration services typically exceed first year licence cost
Which should you pick?
Choose Clariti if
- You need permitting workflows.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want business licensing.
Questions people ask
- Is CityView or Clariti better?
- Neither clearly leads. CityView starts at $10000/year and Clariti at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CityView or Clariti?
- CityView starts at $10000/year and Clariti at On request.
- Does CityView or Clariti run on more platforms?
- CityView runs on Web. Clariti runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is CityView best used for?
- CityView is most often used for citizen services, records management, public safety, civic engagement. Of those, citizen services and records management are not what Clariti is typically brought in for.
- What can CityView do that Clariti cannot?
- CityView covers Building Permits, Business Licensing, Code Enforcement, Inspections Management. Clariti covers Permitting workflows, Business licensing, Inspections, Code enforcement.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CityView: Is CityView cloud-based or on-premise?
CityView offers both cloud-based SaaS deployments and on-premise options depending on municipality preference and requirements.
SourceClariti: Do we need Salesforce licences as well?
Yes. Clariti runs on the Salesforce platform, and those licences are a separate line item. Insist on a fully loaded quote.
CityView: What modules are included?
CityView Suite includes Property Information, Permits and Inspections, Planning, Code Enforcement, Licensing, Animal Licensing, Service Requests, Rental Housing, Cemetery Management, Parking Management, and Cashiering modules.
SourceClariti: How does it compare with Accela?
Accela has far deeper accumulated handling of edge cases. Clariti offers a more modern and configurable platform, at the price of Salesforce underneath.
CityView: How long has CityView been in the market?
CityView has over 40 years of experience serving local governments with community development and municipal land management solutions.
SourceClariti: Can we see what other agencies paid?
Yes. Permitting contracts are public records and award notices routinely list implementation and annual subscription values.
CityView: What is the pricing structure?
CityView pricing ranges from $10,000 to $75,000+ per year for mid-sized municipalities, or approximately $100 to $250 per user per month for SaaS deployments, depending on modules selected.
SourceClariti: Is it suitable for a small town?
Usually not. The platform cost and implementation effort suit mid sized and larger agencies.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CityView vs Accela
- CityView vs CivicPlus
- CityView vs Granicus
- CityView vs GovPilot
- CityView vs RecDesk
- CityView vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- CityView vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- CityView vs VUEWorks
- CityView vs DataSF
- CityView vs CitizenLab
- CityView vs ClearGov
- CityView vs DemandStar
- CityView vs eCode360
- CityView vs MyRec.com
- CityView vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- CityView vs Legistar
- CityView vs Tyler Technologies
- CityView vs mySidewalk
- CityView vs NEOGOV
- CityView vs ArchiveSocial
- CityView vs Bonfire
- CityView vs Periscope Holdings
- CityView vs Zencity
- CityView vs OpenGov
- CityView vs NextRequest
- CityView vs American Legal Publishing
- Clariti vs Accela
- Clariti vs CivicPlus
- Clariti vs Granicus
- Clariti vs GovPilot
- Clariti vs RecDesk
- Clariti vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Clariti vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Clariti vs VUEWorks
- Clariti vs DataSF
- Clariti vs CitizenLab
- Clariti vs ClearGov
- Clariti vs DemandStar
- Clariti vs eCode360
- Clariti vs MyRec.com
- Clariti vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Clariti vs Legistar
- Clariti vs Tyler Technologies
- Clariti vs mySidewalk
- Clariti vs NEOGOV
- Clariti vs ArchiveSocial
- Clariti vs Bonfire
- Clariti vs Periscope Holdings
- Clariti vs Zencity
- Clariti vs OpenGov
- Clariti vs NextRequest
- Clariti vs American Legal Publishing

